L J Owen1, B G Keevil. 1. Biochemistry Department, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK. Laura.owen@uhsm.nhs.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Testosterone measurement by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is well accepted as the preferred technique for the analysis of testosterone. Variation is seen between assays and is likely to be due to method differences. One area of inconsistency among assays is the choice of internal standard. We investigated the effects of three internal standards. METHODS: Testosterone with two deuterium (D2), five deuterium (D5) and three carbon 13 enrichment (C13) were separately assessed. Samples were extracted using ether following the addition of 10 μL of internal standard. All aliquots were prepared in triplicate, one for each type of internal standard. After mixing, the ether was transferred to a 96-deep well block, and then evaporated to dryness. Extracts were reconstituted with 50% mobile phases and analysed using a Waters Acquity UPLC and Quattro Premier tandem mass spectrometer. This method had previously been shown to have excellent agreement with a reference method using the D2 internal standard and this was considered the target. RESULTS: Lower results were obtained when using D5 testosterone when compared with D2 testosterone. The C13 internal standard also gave lower results, but was closer to the D2 target than the D5 internal standard. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of internal standard alone can have a significant affect on the results obtained by LC-MS/MS assays for testosterone using this chromatography. The effects of the combination of chromatography and internal standard choice should be investigated during method development.
BACKGROUND:Testosterone measurement by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is well accepted as the preferred technique for the analysis of testosterone. Variation is seen between assays and is likely to be due to method differences. One area of inconsistency among assays is the choice of internal standard. We investigated the effects of three internal standards. METHODS:Testosterone with two deuterium (D2), five deuterium (D5) and three carbon 13 enrichment (C13) were separately assessed. Samples were extracted using ether following the addition of 10 μL of internal standard. All aliquots were prepared in triplicate, one for each type of internal standard. After mixing, the ether was transferred to a 96-deep well block, and then evaporated to dryness. Extracts were reconstituted with 50% mobile phases and analysed using a Waters Acquity UPLC and Quattro Premier tandem mass spectrometer. This method had previously been shown to have excellent agreement with a reference method using the D2 internal standard and this was considered the target. RESULTS: Lower results were obtained when using D5 testosterone when compared with D2 testosterone. The C13 internal standard also gave lower results, but was closer to the D2 target than the D5 internal standard. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of internal standard alone can have a significant affect on the results obtained by LC-MS/MS assays for testosterone using this chromatography. The effects of the combination of chromatography and internal standard choice should be investigated during method development.
Authors: Ronda F Greaves; Chung S Ho; Kirsten E Hoad; John Joseph; Brett McWhinney; Janice P Gill; Therese Koal; Chris Fouracre; Heidi P Iu; Brian R Cooke; Conchita Boyder; Hai T Pham; Lisa M Jolly Journal: Clin Biochem Rev Date: 2016-05
Authors: Olayiwola O Oduwole; Natalia Vydra; Nicholas E M Wood; Luna Samanta; Laura Owen; Brian Keevil; Mandy Donaldson; Kikkeri Naresh; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi Journal: FASEB J Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 5.191