INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest that initial smoking pleasure influences future smoking behavior. We investigated how initial reactions to cigarettes or Swedish smokeless tobacco (snus) were associated with future use among 10,708 adults from the Swedish Twin Registry. METHODS: The Early Smoking Experience questionnaire captured physiologic reactions to initial tobacco use. Binary recursive partitioning (BRP) identified combinations of initial reactions predictive of regular tobacco use. Analyses, stratified by sex, were conducted separately among those who experimented with only cigarettes (EC), only snus (ES), and both products (EC+S). RESULTS: Among EC, 39.8% of men and 43.7% of women became smokers, while among ES, 78.6% of men and 53.7% of women became snus users. Among EC+S, 31.3% of men and 20.0% of women became dual users. BRP identified different reactions as predictive of future smoking for men (buzz) and women (dizziness, difficulty inhaling). No initial reaction predicted future snus use among men, but pleasant sensations, later age at first use, and relaxation predicted future snus use for women. Among EC+S, future exclusive use of either product was associated with a favorable initial reaction to that product. Dual users experienced higher prevalence of pleasant reactions and lower prevalence of unpleasant reactions in response to both products. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that those who progress to regular tobacco use may be sensitive to the rewarding effects of nicotine but suggest that initial reactions differ by tobacco type. A high proportion of men became regular snus users regardless of initial reactions.
INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest that initial smoking pleasure influences future smoking behavior. We investigated how initial reactions to cigarettes or Swedish smokeless tobacco (snus) were associated with future use among 10,708 adults from the Swedish Twin Registry. METHODS: The Early Smoking Experience questionnaire captured physiologic reactions to initial tobacco use. Binary recursive partitioning (BRP) identified combinations of initial reactions predictive of regular tobacco use. Analyses, stratified by sex, were conducted separately among those who experimented with only cigarettes (EC), only snus (ES), and both products (EC+S). RESULTS: Among EC, 39.8% of men and 43.7% of women became smokers, while among ES, 78.6% of men and 53.7% of women became snus users. Among EC+S, 31.3% of men and 20.0% of women became dual users. BRP identified different reactions as predictive of future smoking for men (buzz) and women (dizziness, difficulty inhaling). No initial reaction predicted future snus use among men, but pleasant sensations, later age at first use, and relaxation predicted future snus use for women. Among EC+S, future exclusive use of either product was associated with a favorable initial reaction to that product. Dual users experienced higher prevalence of pleasant reactions and lower prevalence of unpleasant reactions in response to both products. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that those who progress to regular tobacco use may be sensitive to the rewarding effects of nicotine but suggest that initial reactions differ by tobacco type. A high proportion of men became regular snus users regardless of initial reactions.
Authors: Ovide F Pomerleau; Cynthia S Pomerleau; Ann M Mehringer; Sandy M Snedecor; Oliver G Cameron Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Paul Lichtenstein; Patrick F Sullivan; Sven Cnattingius; Margaret Gatz; Sofie Johansson; Eva Carlström; Camilla Björk; Magnus Svartengren; Alicja Wolk; Lars Klareskog; Ulf de Faire; Martin Schalling; Juni Palmgren; Nancy L Pedersen Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Joseph R DiFranza; Judith A Savageau; Kenneth Fletcher; Judith K Ockene; Nancy A Rigotti; Ann D McNeill; Mardia Coleman; Constance Wood Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Joseph R DiFranza; Judith A Savageau; Kenneth Fletcher; Lori Pbert; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Ann D McNeill; Judith K Ockene; Karen Friedman; Jennifer Hazelton; Connie Wood; Gretchen Dussault; Robert J Wellman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Dale S Cannon; Robin J Mermelstein; Tait R Medina; Oksana Pugach; Donald Hedeker; Robert B Weiss Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Dale S Mantey; Melissa B Harrell; Kathleen Case; Brittani Crook; Steven H Kelder; Cheryl L Perry Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Elizabeth K Do; Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Danielle M Dick; Kenneth S Kendler; Hermine H Maes Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Raina D Pang; Casey R Guillot; Michael J Zvolensky; Marcel O Bonn-Miller; Adam M Leventhal Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Maggie M Sweitzer; Lauren R Pacek; Rachel V Kozink; Erin Locey; Scott H Kollins; Eric C Donny; F Joseph McClernon Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 4.415