Literature DB >> 22949446

Fee-for-service will remain a feature of major payment reforms, requiring more changes in Medicare physician payment.

Paul B Ginsburg1.   

Abstract

Many health policy analysts envision provider payment reforms currently under development as replacements for the traditional fee-for-service payment system. Reforms include per episode bundled payment and elements of capitation, such as global payments or accountable care organizations. But even if these approaches succeed and are widely adopted, the core method of payment to many physicians for the services they provide is likely to remain fee-for-service. It is therefore critical to address the current shortcomings in the Medicare physician fee schedule, because it will affect physician incentives and will continue to play an important role in determining the payment amounts under payment reform. This article reviews how the current payment system developed and is applied, and it highlights areas that require careful review and modification to ensure the success of broader payment reform.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22949446     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  12 in total

1.  US health care policy and reform: implications for cardiac electrophysiology.

Authors:  Mintu P Turakhia; Aditya J Ullal
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Relationship between hospital financial performance and publicly reported outcomes.

Authors:  Oanh Kieu Nguyen; Ethan A Halm; Anil N Makam
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  How to work with insurance companies.

Authors:  Joel M Kaufman
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2015-10

4.  Mechanical Ventilation and Survival in Patients With Advanced Dementia in Medicare Advantage.

Authors:  Donald R Sullivan; Pedro Gozalo; Jennifer Bunker; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.576

5.  Health Policy and Shared Decision Making in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.

Authors:  Brandon C Maughan; Zachary F Meisel; Arjun K Venkatesh; Michelle P Lin; Warren M Perry; Jeremiah D Schuur; Jesse M Pines; Constance L Kizzie-Gillett; William Vaughan; Corita R Grudzen
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Racial Disparities in Outpatient Mental Health Service Use Among Children Hospitalized for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Megan Moore; Nathalia Jimenez; Janessa M Graves; Tessa Rue; Jesse R Fann; Frederick P Rivara; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.710

7.  Emerging lessons from regional and state innovation in value-based payment reform: balancing collaboration and disruptive innovation.

Authors:  Douglas A Conrad; David Grembowski; Susan E Hernandez; Bernard Lau; Miriam Marcus-Smith
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Doing More for More: Unintended Consequences of Financial Incentives for Oncology Specialty Care.

Authors:  Brock O'Neil; Amy J Graves; Daniel A Barocas; Sam S Chang; David F Penson; Matthew J Resnick
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The relationship between insurance and health outcomes of diabetes mellitus patients in Maryland: a retrospective archival record study.

Authors:  Soo-Hoon Lee; Samuel L Brown; Andrew A Bennett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Developing an internationally-applicable service specification for continence care: systematic review, evidence synthesis and expert consensus.

Authors:  Adrian S Wagg; Diane K Newman; Kai Leichsenring; Paul van Houten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.