Literature DB >> 22949335

Evaluation of the Neuropad sudomotor function test as a screening tool for polyneuropathy in the elderly population with diabetes and pre-diabetes: the KORA F4 survey.

D Ziegler1, N Papanas, W Rathmann, M Heier, M Scheer, C Meisinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuropad is a novel indicator test for sudomotor dysfunction, which has not been validated as a screening tool in a population-based study. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of Neuropad as a screening tool for distal symmetric polyneuropathy among elderly subjects with diabetes and pre-diabetes in the general population.
METHODS: Eligible subjects aged 61-82 years (n = 940) from the KORA F4 survey were examined, 201 of whom had diabetes and 231 had pre-diabetes (WHO 1999 criteria). Polyneuropathy was defined by the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score >3.
RESULTS: Polyneuropathy was diagnosed in 60 (29.9%) subjects with diabetes and in 45 (19.5%) subjects with pre-diabetes, respectively (p = 0.013). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of Neuropad (reading time: 10 min) for the diagnosis of polyneuropathy were moderately high, reaching 76.7% and 78.1% in subjects with diabetes and 57.8% and 76.5% in those with pre-diabetes, respectively. Conversely, the specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of polyneuropathy were rather low: 35.5% and 33.6% in diabetic individuals and 33.3% and 17.3% in subjects with pre-diabetes, respectively. Use of the >2 cut-off and MNSI combined with monofilament examination did not improve the diagnostic performance of Neuropad.
CONCLUSIONS: In the elderly general population with diabetes and pre-diabetes, Neuropad has reasonable sensitivity but rather low specificity for the diagnosis of polyneuropathy. It is a useful simple and inexpensive tool to screen for and to exclude polyneuropathy as desired, while its low specificity implies that a longer reading time merits consideration.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22949335     DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  7 in total

Review 1.  New vistas in the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Nikolaos Papanas; Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Neurovascular function and sudorimetry in health and disease.

Authors:  Aaron I Vinik; Marie Nevoret; Carolina Casellini; Henri Parson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Prediabetic neuropathy: does it exist?

Authors:  Nikolaos Papanas; Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Painful and non-painful diabetic neuropathy, diagnostic challenges and implications for future management.

Authors:  Troels S Jensen; Pall Karlsson; Sandra S Gylfadottir; Signe T Andersen; David L Bennett; Hatice Tankisi; Nanna B Finnerup; Astrid J Terkelsen; Karolina Khan; Andreas C Themistocleous; Alexander G Kristensen; Mustapha Itani; Søren H Sindrup; Henning Andersen; Morten Charles; Eva L Feldman; Brian C Callaghan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  Prevalence of peripheral neuropathy in pre-diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Varo Kirthi; Anugraha Perumbalath; Emily Brown; Sarah Nevitt; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Jamie Burgess; Rebecca Roylance; Daniel J Cuthbertson; Timothy L Jackson; Rayaz A Malik; Uazman Alam
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2021-05

6.  Feasibility and effectiveness of electrochemical dermal conductance measurement for the screening of diabetic neuropathy in primary care. DECODING Study (Dermal Electrochemical Conductance in Diabetic Neuropathy). Rationale and design.

Authors:  Juan J Cabré; Teresa Mur; Bernardo Costa; Francisco Barrio; Charo López-Moya; Ramon Sagarra; Montserrat García-Barco; Jesús Vizcaíno; Immaculada Bonaventura; Nicolau Ortiz; Gemma Flores-Mateo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Dryness of Foot Skin Assessed by the Visual Indicator Test and Risk of Diabetic Foot Ulceration: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Georgios S Panagoulias; Ioanna Eleftheriadou; Nikolaos Papanas; Christos Manes; Zdravko Kamenov; Dragan Tesic; Stavros Bousboulas; Anastasios Tentolouris; Edward B Jude; Nikolaos Tentolouris
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.