Literature DB >> 22948658

Analysis of morbidity and mortality in surgical management of craniosynostosis.

Hui Qing Lee1, John M Hutson, Alison C Wray, Patrick A Lo, David K Chong, Anthony D Holmes, Andrew L Greensmith.   

Abstract

Multidisciplinary care involving plastic surgery and neurosurgery is generally accepted as optimal to manage craniosynostosis to avoid complications and to identify patients at risk. We conducted a retrospective 30-year review of craniosynostosis surgery at a single major craniofacial institute to establish the rate and predictors of complications. Medical records of 796 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery for craniosynostosis from 1981 to 2010 at our institute were analyzed for complications. Complications were defined as intraoperative and postoperative adverse events requiring changed management. Reoperation was defined as a repeat transcranial procedure. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for complications or revision. Across the years, the procedures evolved from technically simple to complex, which increased complications but better outcomes. Complications occurred in 111 patients (14%), and 33 (5.4%) needed major revision. Multivariate analysis identified multisuture and syndromic craniosynostosis, more recent surgeries, younger age (<9 months), spring-assisted cranioplasty, longer surgery, and greater transfusion as predictors of complications. Patients with syndromic and multisutural craniosynostosis and those operated on younger than 9 months had increased risk of major revision surgery for regression to phenotype. Our experience over 30 years indicates that pediatric transcranial craniosynostosis surgery can be safely carried out in our tertiary referral center. There were no deaths from primary surgery, and complication and reoperation rates mirror those of other published studies. Syndromic and complex craniosynostosis predicted both complications and need for major revision. Spring cranioplasty was associated with higher complications. Overall results support a recommended age for craniosynostosis surgery between 9 and 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22948658     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824e26d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  11 in total

1.  Culture meets surgery.

Authors:  Hannes Haberl
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Age at Time of Craniosynostosis Repair Predicts Increased Complication Rate.

Authors:  William J Bruce; Victor Chang; Cara J Joyce; Adrienne N Cobb; Uma I Maduekwe; Parit A Patel
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2017-12-14

3.  Impact of Cardiac Risk Factors on Complications Following Cranial Vault Remodeling: Analysis of the 2012 to 2016 National Safety Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Database.

Authors:  Marisa Bartz-Kurycki; Shuyan Wei; Karla Bernardi; Joseph K Moffitt; Matthew R Greives
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Microscopic versus open approach to craniosynostosis: a long-term outcomes comparison.

Authors:  John F Teichgraeber; James E Baumgartner; Stephen L Viviano; Jaime Gateno; James J Xia
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 5.  Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Anshit Goyal; Victor M Lu; Yagiz U Yolcu; Mohamed Elminawy; David J Daniels
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Characterization of complications associated with open and endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery at a single institution.

Authors:  Rowland H Han; Dennis C Nguyen; Brent S Bruck; Gary B Skolnick; Chester K Yarbrough; Sybill D Naidoo; Kamlesh B Patel; Alex A Kane; Albert S Woo; Matthew D Smyth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public.

Authors:  Emilie Robertson; Peter Kwan; Gorman Louie; Pierre Boulanger; Daniel Aalto
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-25

8.  Secondary bicoronal synostosis after metopic craniosynostosis surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Arash Esmaeli; Farideh Nejat; Zohreh Habibi; Mostafa El Khashab
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

9.  Pharmacological targeting of KDM6A and KDM6B, as a novel therapeutic strategy for treating craniosynostosis in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome.

Authors:  Clara Pribadi; Esther Camp; Dimitrios Cakouros; Peter Anderson; Carlotta Glackin; Stan Gronthos
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 6.832

10.  Use of an Oral Device in the Stabilization of Facial Advancement after Early Removal of the Osteodistraction Device for Postoperative Sequelae.

Authors:  Giulio Gasparini; Gianmarco Saponaro; Michela Perina; Roberto Boniello; Camillo Azzuni; Enrico Foresta; Giuseppe D'Amato; Mattia Todaro; Piero Doneddu; Luca Massimi; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Sandro Pelo; Umberto Garagiola; Alessandro Moro
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.