AIM: We describe the first living donor intestinal transplant (LDIT) in India and discuss the indications and problems of this complex procedure. METHODS: A 43-year-old male patient required massive bowel resection for gangrene due to thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery. He was maintained on parenteral nutrition but developed cholestasis and well as repeated catheter related infections with progressive loss of venous access due to thrombosis of central veins. A LDIT was performed using 200 cm of small intestine from the patient's son. The graft was based on the continuation of the superior mesenteric vessels beyond the ileocolic branch. The artery was anastomosed directly to the aorta and the vein to the venacava. RESULTS: The graft functioned well and he was weaned off parenteral nutrition. However, he later developed complications (wound dehiscence and enterocutaneous fistula) and developed sepsis. He succumbed to sepsis with a functioning graft 6 weeks after the transplant. The donor recovered uneventfully and was discharged on the 4th postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: LDIT can be life saving in patients with intestinal failure and failure of parenteral nutrition. There is a need to introduce this modality in India. In a setting of scarcity of deceased donor organs the living donor option has advantages.
AIM: We describe the first living donor intestinal transplant (LDIT) in India and discuss the indications and problems of this complex procedure. METHODS: A 43-year-old male patient required massive bowel resection for gangrene due to thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery. He was maintained on parenteral nutrition but developed cholestasis and well as repeated catheter related infections with progressive loss of venous access due to thrombosis of central veins. A LDIT was performed using 200 cm of small intestine from the patient's son. The graft was based on the continuation of the superior mesenteric vessels beyond the ileocolic branch. The artery was anastomosed directly to the aorta and the vein to the venacava. RESULTS: The graft functioned well and he was weaned off parenteral nutrition. However, he later developed complications (wound dehiscence and enterocutaneous fistula) and developed sepsis. He succumbed to sepsis with a functioning graft 6 weeks after the transplant. The donor recovered uneventfully and was discharged on the 4th postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: LDIT can be life saving in patients with intestinal failure and failure of parenteral nutrition. There is a need to introduce this modality in India. In a setting of scarcity of deceased donor organs the living donor option has advantages.
Authors: Mark L Barr; Jacques Belghiti; Federico G Villamil; Elizabeth A Pomfret; David S Sutherland; Rainer W Gruessner; Alan N Langnas; Francis L Delmonico Journal: Transplantation Date: 2006-05-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: L G Koudstaal; N A 't Hart; A van den Berg; P Olinga; H van Goor; R J Ploeg; H G D Leuvenink Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: A S Soin; R Mohanka; N Saraf; A Rastogi; S Goja; B Menon; V Vohra; S Saigal; R Sud; D Kumar; P Bhangui; S Ramachandra; P Singla; G Shetty; K Raghvendra; Kareem M Abu Elmagd Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-02-07
Authors: Elizabeth Harrison; Philip Allan; Amrutha Ramu; Anil Vaidya; Simon Travis; Simon Lal Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 5.742