Literature DB >> 22948543

Ulnar nerve measurements in healthy individuals to obtain reference values.

Elif Yalcin1, Burcu Onder, Mufit Akyuz.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to obtain the ultrasonographical reference values of ulnar nerve cross-sectional areas at the common areas of nerve entrapment as well as any differences related to age, sex, weight, height, dominant arm. Cross-sectional areas of the ulnar nerves of 72 healthy volunteers were measured bilaterally at the level of the epicondyle, 2 cm proximal to and 2 cm distal to the epicondyle, just at the entrance of cubital tunnel, at arterial split, at Guyon's canal. Age, sex, body weight, height, body mass index, and dominant extremity were recorded. The mean ulnar nerve cross-sectional area was 5.8 ± 1.1 mm(2) at 2 cm proximal to medial epicondyle, 6.2 ± 1.1 mm(2) at the medial epicondyle, 5.6 ± 0.9 mm(2) at the entrance of the cubital tunnel, 5.6 ± 1.0 mm(2) at 2 cm distal to medial epicondyle (inside the flexor carpi ulnaris), 5.0 ± 0.6 mm(2) at arterial split, and 4.9 ± 0.6 mm(2) at Guyon's canal. There was statistically no difference between the dominant and nondominant sides (p > 0.05). Females had statistically smaller nerves than males (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation with height at all levels; also, weight was significantly correlated with cross-sectional areas except at two levels: tip of medial epicondyle and 2 cm distal. This study provides normative data of ulnar nerve ultrasonography and as well as any differences related to age, sex, height, weight, and dominant arm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22948543     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-012-2527-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  17 in total

1.  Sonoanatomy of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel: a multicentre study by the GEL.

Authors:  D Jacob; V Creteur; C Courthaliac; R Bargoin; B Sassus; C Bacq; J L Rozies; J P Cercueil; J L Brasseur
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Ultrasound of nerve and muscle.

Authors:  Francis O Walker; Michael S Cartwright; Ethan R Wiesler; James Caress
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of posterior interosseous nerve entrapment: a case report.

Authors:  Murat Kara; Tülay Tiftik; Alparslan Yetişgin; Gülçin Ural; Levent Ozçakar
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Carpal tunnel syndrome in two cases of all ulnar hand: a word for nerve's ultrasound.

Authors:  Murat Kara; Gülten Erkin; Fevziye Unsal Malas; Bayram Kaymak; Hilmi Uysal; Levent Ozçakar
Journal:  Acta Reumatol Port       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.290

5.  Ultrasonography in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: comparison of cross-sectional area and swelling ratio with electrophysiological severity.

Authors:  Ayse Oytun Bayrak; Ilkay Koray Bayrak; Hande Turker; Muzaffer Elmali; Mehmet Selim Nural
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Electromyography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of a rare double-crush ulnar nerve injury.

Authors:  Mufit Akyuz; Elif Yalcin; Barin Selcuk; Burcu Onder; Levent Ozçakar
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Avoiding false-negative nerve conduction study in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Authors:  Sun Jae Won; Joon Shik Yoon; Jun Yeon Kim; Sei Joo Kim; Jin Seok Jeong
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 8.  Cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Steven Cutts
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Peripheral nerve size in normals and patients with polyneuropathy: an ultrasound study.

Authors:  Craig M Zaidman; Mohammed Al-Lozi; Alan Pestronk
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Cubital tunnel syndrome: diagnosis by high-resolution ultrasonography.

Authors:  H J Chiou; Y H Chou; S P Cheng; C C Hsu; R C Chan; C M Tiu; M M Teng; C Y Chang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ulnar nerve reference values for cross-sectional area, intranerve cross sectional area variability and side to side difference ratio.

Authors:  A Kerasnoudis; K Pitarokoili
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Cross-sectional area reference values for high-resolution ultrasonography of the lower extremity nerves in healthy Korean adults.

Authors:  Dae Woong Bae; Jae Young An
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Estimation of ultrasound reference values for the ulnar nerve fascicular number and cross-sectional area in young males: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelmohsen Bedewi; Ahmed M M Yousef; Amr Adel Abd-Elghany; Mohamed Sherif El-Sharkawy; Ezzat M Awad
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Cross-sectional area reference values for high-resolution ultrasonography of the upper extremity nerves in healthy Asian adults.

Authors:  Dae Woong Bae; Jae Young An
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.