Literature DB >> 22948387

Prospective randomized study of cefepime, panipenem, or meropenem monotherapy for patients with hematological disorders and febrile neutropenia.

Yasunori Nakagawa1, Keishi Suzuki, Kensuke Ohta, Masayuki Hino, Kazuma Ohyashiki, Akihisa Kanamaru, Kazuo Tamura, Akio Urabe, Tohru Masaoka.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of carbapenems as initial treatment for febrile neutropenia (FN), and in patients unresponsive to this initial therapy, to evaluate the efficacy of subsequent treatment with aminoglycosides (AGs) or ciprofloxacin (CPFX). FN patients were randomized to receive cefepime (CFPM, control), panipenem/betamiprom (PAPM/BP), or meropenem (MEPM). Defervescence, an outcome endpoint, was evaluated 3 days later. Patients with minimal response were given CPFX or AGs, and their responses were reevaluated on day 7. A total of 255 patients were included. The efficacies of CFPM, PAPM/BP, and MEPM were comparable. In patients unresponsive to this initial therapy, the efficacy of subsequent CPFX and AGs treatments was also similar. There was no significant between-arm difference in cumulative efficacy on days 14 and 30. Adverse reactions were infrequent and mild. In conclusion, PAPM/BP and MEPM are as useful as CFPM as initial therapy for FN, and AGs are as efficacious as CPFX in patients unresponsive to the initial therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22948387     DOI: 10.1007/s10156-012-0466-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  1 in total

1.  The Dose-Dependent Efficacy of Cefepime in the Empiric Management of Febrile Neutropenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nikolaos Andreatos; Myrto Eleni Flokas; Anna Apostolopoulou; Michail Alevizakos; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.835

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.