OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether a parent education program based on Satter's division of responsibility in feeding children (DOR) is effective in enhancing parent/child feeding interactions for children with an overweight/obese parent. The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would decrease parental pressure to eat. METHODS:Sixty-two families with a child between 2 and 4 years with at least 1 overweight/obese parent were randomly allocated using a cluster design to either the DOR intervention or a control group. The control group focused on increasing family consumption of healthy foods and activity levels and enhancing child sleep duration. The primary outcome was parent pressure on their child to eat. RESULTS: The DOR intervention was superior to the control group in reducing the pressure to eat. Two moderators of pressure to eat were found: disinhibition of eating and hunger. The parents in the DOR group, irrespective of disinhibition levels, lowered the pressure to eat, whereas those in the control group with low disinhibition increased the pressure to eat. There were similar findings for hunger. Gender moderated restrictive feeding with DOR parents lowering restriction more than parents of the control group in girls only. CONCLUSION: The DOR intervention was more effective in reducing the parent pressure to eat and food restriction (in girls only) than the control group.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether a parent education program based on Satter's division of responsibility in feeding children (DOR) is effective in enhancing parent/child feeding interactions for children with an overweight/obese parent. The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would decrease parental pressure to eat. METHODS: Sixty-two families with a child between 2 and 4 years with at least 1 overweight/obese parent were randomly allocated using a cluster design to either the DOR intervention or a control group. The control group focused on increasing family consumption of healthy foods and activity levels and enhancing child sleep duration. The primary outcome was parent pressure on their child to eat. RESULTS: The DOR intervention was superior to the control group in reducing the pressure to eat. Two moderators of pressure to eat were found: disinhibition of eating and hunger. The parents in the DOR group, irrespective of disinhibition levels, lowered the pressure to eat, whereas those in the control group with low disinhibition increased the pressure to eat. There were similar findings for hunger. Gender moderated restrictive feeding with DOR parents lowering restriction more than parents of the control group in girls only. CONCLUSION: The DOR intervention was more effective in reducing the parent pressure to eat and food restriction (in girls only) than the control group.
Authors: W Stewart Agras; Susan Bryson; Lawrence D Hammer; Helena C Kraemer Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Eric A Hodges; Susan L Johnson; Sheryl O Hughes; Judy M Hopkinson; Nancy F Butte; Jennifer O Fisher Journal: Appetite Date: 2013-02-16 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Ihuoma U Eneli; Tracy L Tylka; Jessica Hummel; Rosanna P Watowicz; Susana A Perez; Niko Kaciroti; Julie C Lumeng Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 2.226