Literature DB >> 22947805

Distinguishing between perceiver and wearer effects in clothing color-associated attributions.

S Craig Roberts1, Roy C Owen, Jan Havlicek.   

Abstract

Recent studies have noted positive effects of red clothing on success in competitive sports, perhaps arising from an evolutionary predisposition to associate the color red with dominance status. Red may also enhance judgments of women's attractiveness by men, perhaps through a similar association with fertility. Here we extend these studies by investigating attractiveness judgments of both sexes and by contrasting attributions based on six different colors. Furthermore, by photographing targets repeatedly in different colors, we could investigate whether color effects are due to influences on raters or clothing wearers, by either withholding from raters information about clothing color or holding it constant via digital manipulation, while retaining color-associated variation in wearer's expression and posture. When color cues were available, we found color-attractiveness associations when males were judged by either sex, or when males judged females, but not when females judged female images. Both red and black were associated with higher attractiveness judgments and had approximately equivalent effects. Importantly, we also detected significant clothing color-attractiveness associations even when clothing color was obscured from raters and when color was held constant by digital manipulation. These results suggest that clothing color has a psychological influence on wearers at least as much as on raters, and that this ultimately influences attractiveness judgments by others. Our results lend support for the idea that evolutionarily-derived color associations can bias interpersonal judgments, although these are limited neither to effects on raters nor to the color red.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 22947805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Psychol        ISSN: 1474-7049


  14 in total

1.  Red clothing increases perceived dominance, aggression and anger.

Authors:  Diana Wiedemann; D Michael Burt; Russell A Hill; Robert A Barton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Human colour in mate choice and competition.

Authors:  Hannah M Rowland; Robert P Burriss
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Extending color psychology to the personality realm: interpersonal hostility varies by red preferences and perceptual biases.

Authors:  Adam K Fetterman; Tianwei Liu; Michael D Robinson
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2014-03-05

4.  Extraneous color affects female macaques' gaze preference for photographs of male conspecifics.

Authors:  Kelly D Hughes; James P Higham; William L Allen; Andrew J Elliot; Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.178

5.  Men in red: A reexamination of the red-attractiveness effect.

Authors:  Vera M Hesslinger; Lisa Goldbach; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

6.  Color in context: psychological context moderates the influence of red on approach- and avoidance-motivated behavior.

Authors:  Brian P Meier; Paul R D'Agostino; Andrew J Elliot; Markus A Maier; Benjamin M Wilkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Red is not a proxy signal for female genitalia in humans.

Authors:  Sarah E Johns; Lucy A Hargrave; Nicholas E Newton-Fisher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dressed for sex: red as a female sexual signal in humans.

Authors:  Andrew J Elliot; Adam D Pazda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Red - take a closer look.

Authors:  Vanessa L Buechner; Markus A Maier; Stephanie Lichtenfeld; Sascha Schwarz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Experience reverses the red effect among Chinese stockbrokers.

Authors:  Tengxiao Zhang; Buxin Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.