Literature DB >> 2294759

Proposal for a simple synthesis prognostic staging system in chronic myelogenous leukemia.

H M Kantarjian1, M J Keating, T L Smith, M Talpaz, K B McCredie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several prognostic models or staging systems have been published that identify different risk groups in patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). The aims of this study were (1) to test, in an independent population, the prognostic reproducibility of these staging systems; and (2) to develop a synthesis staging system that could be easily applied in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 406 patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive CML were evaluated by the four published staging systems of Tura, Cervantes, Sokal, and our group. The proposed synthesis staging system was developed based on the most consistent prognostic characteristics, and the presence or absence of accelerated disease features at diagnosis. The staging systems were compared according to survival outcome, as well as by looking for differences of survival outcomes within a specific stage of a defined system, when patients in this stage were subclassified by a second staging system.
RESULTS: Whereas the staging system of Cervantes et al identified only two prognostic groups (median survivals of 49 versus 40 months; p = 0.01), the remaining three staging systems were able to segregate patients into stage 1, 2, and 3 risk groups with respective median survivals of 56 to 57, 41 to 42, and 28 to 36 months, respectively (p less than 0.001 to p less than 0.002). The new proposed staging system, based on the existence of zero to one (stage 1), two (stage 2), or three or more unfavorable (stage 3) characteristics, or the presence of accelerated disease features (stage 4), categorized patients into four prognostic groups with median survivals of 56, 45, 30, and 30 months, respectively (p less than 0.001), the latter stage (stage 4) being associated with a higher one-year mortality rate (29%). The synthesis staging system was also able to subclassify patients within most of Tura's and Sokal's stages into significantly different prognostic groups by survival outcome.
CONCLUSION: The predictive prognostic capacity of three of the four published staging systems was confirmed in this independent or test population. The new proposed staging system was superior to the staging systems of Tura and Sokal in identifying different prognostic subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2294759     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90119-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  18 in total

1.  Prognostic implications of bone marrow features in chronic myelogenous leukaemia.

Authors:  J Thiele; R Fischer
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1992

2.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization monitoring of BCR-ABL-positive neutrophils in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients during the primary stage of imatinib mesylate therapy.

Authors:  Naoto Takahashi; Ikuo Miura; Yoshimi Kobayashi; Masaaki Kume; Tomoko Yoshioka; Wataru Otane; Kaori Ohtsubo; Kaoru Takahashi; Atsushi Kitabayashi; Yoshinari Kawabata; Makoto Hirokawa; Hirokazu Nishijima; Ryo Ichinohasama; John Decoteau; Akira B Miura; Ken-Ichi Sawada
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2015.

Authors:  Philip A Thompson; Hagop M Kantarjian; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Potential mechanisms of disease progression and management of advanced-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Elias J Jabbour; Timothy P Hughes; Jorge E Cortés; Hagop M Kantarjian; Andreas Hochhaus
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-11-12

5.  Histological features of prognostic significance in CML--an immunohistochemical and morphometric study (multivariate regression analysis) on trephine biopsies of the bone marrow.

Authors:  J Thiele; H M Kvasnicka; B R Titius; U Parpert; R Nebel; R Zankovich; D Dienemann; H Stein; V Diehl; R Fischer
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 6.  How I treat newly diagnosed chronic phase CML.

Authors:  Jorge Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloid leukemia with the bcr/abl fusion gene.

Authors:  Fumihiko Monma; Kazuhiro Nishii; Shunji Yamamori; Noboru Hosokai; Takahiro Nakazaki; Felipe Lorenzo; Eiji Usui; Miho Sakakura; Hiroyuki Miyashita; Atsushi Fujieda; Kohshi Ohishi; Naoyuki Katayama; Hiroshi Shiku
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Divergent in vivo and in vitro antileukemic activity of recombinant interferon beta in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  W E Aulitzky; C Peschel; D Desprès; J Aman; P Trautman; H Tilg; G Rudolf; H Hüttmann; J Obermeier; M Herold
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.673

9.  Confirmation and improvement of Sokal's prognostic classification of Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia: the value of early evaluation of the course of the disease. The Italian Cooperative Study Group on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 10.  Chronic myeloid leukemia: pathophysiology, diagnostic parameters, and current treatment concepts.

Authors:  Christian Sillaber; Matthias Mayerhofer; Hermine Agis; Verena Sagaster; Christine Mannhalter; Wolfgang R Sperr; Klaus Geissler; Peter Valent
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.