Literature DB >> 22947462

Comparison of individual, pooled, and composite fecal sampling methods for detection of Salmonella on U.S. dairy operations.

J E Lombard1, A L Beam, E M Nifong, C P Fossler, C A Kopral, D A Dargatz, B A Wagner, M M Erdman, P J Fedorka-Cray.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of Salmonella for individual, pooled, and composite fecal samples and to compare culture results from each sample type for determining herd Salmonella infection status and identifying Salmonella serovar(s). During the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Animal Health Monitoring System Dairy 2007 study, data and samples were collected from dairy operations in 17 major dairy states. As part of the study, composite fecal samples (six per operation) were collected from cow areas, such as holding pens, alleyways, and lagoons, where manure accumulates. Fecal samples also were collected from individual cows (35 per operation), and fecal sample pools were created by combining samples from 5 cows (7 per operation). A total of 1,541 composite fecal samples were collected from 260 operations in 17 states, and 406 (26.3%) of these samples were culture positive for Salmonella. Among the 116 operations for which all three sample types were obtained, 41.4% (48 operations) were Salmonella culture positive based on individual samples, 39.7% (46 operations) were positive based on pooled samples, and 49.1% (57 operations) were positive based on composite fecal samples. Relative to individual samples, the sensitivity of composite fecal samples for determining herd infection status was 85.4% and the sensitivity of pooled fecal samples was 91.7%. On 33.6% of operations (39 of 116), Salmonella was cultured from all three fecal sample types (individual, pooled, and composite), and 20 (51.3%) of these operations had exactly the same serovar in all three sample types. Use of composite fecal samples is less costly and time-consuming than use of individual or pooled samples and provides similar results for detecting the presence and identifying serovars of Salmonella in dairy herds. Therefore, composite sampling may be an appropriate alternative to culture of individual samples when assessing Salmonella status in dairy herds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22947462     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  6 in total

1.  Herd- and individual-level prevalences of and risk factors for Salmonella spp. fecal shedding in dairy farms in Al-Dhulail Valley, Jordan.

Authors:  Yaser H Tarazi; Mahmoud N Abo-Shehada
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Evaluation of the sensitivity of faecal sampling for detection of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium and other Salmonella in cattle and pigs.

Authors:  M E Arnold; R J Gosling; F Martelli; D Mueller-Doblies; R H Davies
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Outbreak of Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella Heidelberg Infections Linked to Dairy Calf Exposure, United States, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Megin Nichols; Lauren Gollarza; Donald Sockett; Nicole Aulik; Elisabeth Patton; Louise K Francois Watkins; Kelly J Gambino-Shirley; Jason P Folster; Jessica C Chen; Kaitlin A Tagg; Gregory Sean Stapleton; Eija Trees; Zachary Ellison; Jason Lombard; Brenda Morningstar-Shaw; Linda Schlater; Lina Elbadawi; Rachel Klos
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Epidemiology of Salmonella sp. in California cull dairy cattle: prevalence of fecal shedding and diagnostic accuracy of pooled enriched broth culture of fecal samples.

Authors:  Omran A Abu Aboud; John M Adaska; Deniece R Williams; Paul V Rossitto; John D Champagne; Terry W Lehenbauer; Robert Atwill; Xunde Li; Sharif S Aly
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Animal-related factors associated with moderate-to-severe diarrhea in children younger than five years in western Kenya: A matched case-control study.

Authors:  Anne Conan; Ciara E O'Reilly; Eric Ogola; J Benjamin Ochieng; Anna J Blackstock; Richard Omore; Linus Ochieng; Fenny Moke; Michele B Parsons; Lihua Xiao; Dawn Roellig; Tamer H Farag; James P Nataro; Karen L Kotloff; Myron M Levine; Eric D Mintz; Robert F Breiman; Sarah Cleaveland; Darryn L Knobel
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-08-04

Review 6.  Salmonella in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Chelsea L Holschbach; Simon F Peek
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.