Literature DB >> 22946775

LMA ProSeal(TM) vs. i-Gel(TM) in ventilated children: a randomised, crossover study using the size 2 mask.

L Gasteiger1, J Brimacombe, E Oswald, D Perkhofer, A Tonin, C Keller, W Tiefenthaler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) are two extraglottic devices with either an inflatable cuff or a non-inflatable cuff. AIM: We test the hypothesis that oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiberoptic position of the airway tube differ between the size 2 LMA ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) in non-paralysed ventilated children.
METHODS: Fifty-one children aged 1.5-6 years weighing 10-25 kg were studied using a crossover design. Anaesthesia was with remifentanil/propofol mixture. The LMA ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) were inserted into each patient in random order.
RESULTS: Oropharyngeal leak pressure for the LMA ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) was similar at 22 (5) and 21 (5) cm H(2) O, respectively. Fiberoptic position of the airway tube for the LMA ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) was similar, with the vocal cords visible from the distal airway tube in 94% and 96%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiberoptic position of the airway tube are similar for the size 2 LMA ProSeal(TM) and i-Gel(TM) in non-paralysed ventilated children.
© 2012 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica © 2012 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22946775     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02765.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  8 in total

1.  Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  Andreas Biedler; Marc Wrobel; Sven Schneider; Stefan Soltész; Stephan Ziegeler; Ulrich Grundmann
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  A randomised trial to compare i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients.

Authors:  R Nirupa; Satinder Gombar; Vanita Ahuja; Preeti Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-10

3.  A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel® and ProSeal LMA in children.

Authors:  Deepali P Thakur; Anila D Malde
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-02-04

4.  Use of extraglottic airways in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic surgery without the need for tracheal intubation.

Authors:  T Suhitharan; Wendy H L Teoh
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-10

5.  Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Sai Saran; Sandeep Kumar Mishra; Ashok Shankar Badhe; Arumugam Vasudevan; Lenin Babu Elakkumanan; Gayatri Mishra
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04

6.  Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Alzahem; Mansoor Aqil; Tariq A Alzahrani; Ayman H Aljazaeri
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Comparision of Ambu AuraGain™ and LMA® ProSeal in children under controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Reesha Joshi; Priya Rudingwa; Pankaj Kundra; Sakthirajan Panneerselvam; Sandeep K Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-06

8.  Comparison of Proseal LMA with i-Gel in children under controlled ventilation: a prospective randomised clinical study.

Authors:  Praveen Shiveshi; Tejesh Channasandra Anandaswamy
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.