CONTEXT: The result of the studies concerning the bonding of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin is controversial. AIMS: To assess in vitro shear bond strength (SBS) of three self-adhesive dual-cured resin cements to dentin compared to a currently used dual-cured resin cement, using SBS test. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The extant study is an experimental in vitro one on extracted human third molars dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS:40 intact human third molars were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups of 10. Buccal dentin surfaces were exposed perpendicular to the long axis and prepared with SiC papers. A translucent plastic ring, was placed over the dentin surfaces. Group I (Control group): After 15 s of etching and application of Excite DSC Bond (Ex), Variolink II (Var II) resin cement was injected into the plastic ring and was light cured for 40 s. Group II: RelyX Unicem (RX) was injected into the plastic ring and after 30 s, was light cured for 40 s. Group III: Maxcem (Mc) was injected into the plastic ring and after 30 s, was light cured for 40 s. Group IV: Multilink Sprint (MS) was injected into the plastic ring and after 30 s, was light cured for 40 s. After thermal cycling, SBS were measured with a universal testing machine. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical computations were conducted according to Student's t-test. RESULTS: The mean SBS and standard deviations (in parentheses) for groups I, II, III, and IV were 12.95 (2.64), 6.73 (0.79), 3.01 (0.90), 4.60 (0.75) MPa, respectively. Statistical analysis, revealed that: (1) the mean SBS of Var II were significantly higher than the other groups (P<0.05). (2) The mean SBS of Mc and MS were significantly lower than RX (P<0.05). (3) The mean SBS of Mc and MS did not show significant difference (P>0.05). CONCLUSION:Bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements was significantly lower than the conventional total-etch resin cement. RX significantly performed better SBS than Mc and MS to dentin.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: The result of the studies concerning the bonding of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin is controversial. AIMS: To assess in vitro shear bond strength (SBS) of three self-adhesive dual-cured resin cements to dentin compared to a currently used dual-cured resin cement, using SBS test. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The extant study is an experimental in vitro one on extracted human third molars dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 40 intact human third molars were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups of 10. Buccal dentin surfaces were exposed perpendicular to the long axis and prepared with SiC papers. A translucent plastic ring, was placed over the dentin surfaces. Group I (Control group): After 15 s of etching and application of Excite DSC Bond (Ex), Variolink II (Var II) resin cement was injected into the plastic ring and was light cured for 40 s. Group II: RelyX Unicem (RX) was injected into the plastic ring and after 30 s, was light cured for 40 s. Group III: Maxcem (Mc) was injected into the plastic ring and after 30 s, was light cured for 40 s. Group IV: Multilink Sprint (MS) was injected into the plastic ring and after 30 s, was light cured for 40 s. After thermal cycling, SBS were measured with a universal testing machine. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical computations were conducted according to Student's t-test. RESULTS: The mean SBS and standard deviations (in parentheses) for groups I, II, III, and IV were 12.95 (2.64), 6.73 (0.79), 3.01 (0.90), 4.60 (0.75) MPa, respectively. Statistical analysis, revealed that: (1) the mean SBS of Var II were significantly higher than the other groups (P<0.05). (2) The mean SBS of Mc and MS were significantly lower than RX (P<0.05). (3) The mean SBS of Mc and MS did not show significant difference (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements was significantly lower than the conventional total-etch resin cement. RX significantly performed better SBS than Mc and MS to dentin.
Authors: Mariana Dias Moda; Ticiane Cestari Fagundes; André Luiz Fraga Briso; Paulo Henrique Dos Santos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yekula Thapaswini; Nukalamarri O B P Chary; Kshitij V Pardeshi; Rajkiran Chitumalla; Sai A Cherukuri Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Date: 2022-07-13
Authors: Mariana Benedetti Ferreira Webber; Silvia Masae de Araújo Michida; Fabiano Carlos Marson; Giovani Corrêa de Oliveira; Cleverson de Oliveira E Silva Journal: J Int Oral Health Date: 2015-04