Britta Hardy1, Annat Raiter, Maxim Yakimov, Alexander Vilkin, Yaron Niv. 1. Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, 49100, Israel. bhardy@post.tau.ac.il
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The glucose regulated heat shock protein 78 (GRP78) is a central regulator of ER (endoplasmic reticulum) stress due to its pro-survival property. Up regulated GRP78 expression in tumor cells has been correlated with aggressive malignancies whereas some reports have predicted an improved prognosis. Over-expression of GRP78 in the ER promotes its localization to the cell surface on several cell types including tumor cells. METHODS: In order to elucidate whether GRP78 receptor positive and negative tumor cells manifest different properties in colorectal cancer, we first artificially separated GRP78 positive and negative sub-populations from HM7 and HCT116 cell lines using anti GRP78 antibody coated magnetic beads. RESULTS: Only GRP78 negative cells were highly proliferative, induced significant growth in tumor size in nude mice and metastasized to the liver in a human metastatic colorectal carcinoma model in mice. In contrast, GRP78 positive cells manifested reduced proliferation, colony formation, tumor growth and liver metastases. The reduced tumorigenicity of GRP78 positive subpopulation was abrogated by silencing GRP78 expression using siRNA oligomers. In our efforts to induce cell surface GRP78, we subjected the cells to doxorubicin and taxol that increased significantly the percent of GRP78 positive population. Cells pre-incubated with doxorubicin exhibited reduced proliferation and tumor growth in mice. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the significance of cell surface GRP78 in colon cancer, which may be used as a marker for reduced tumorigenicity.
BACKGROUND: The glucose regulated heat shock protein 78 (GRP78) is a central regulator of ER (endoplasmic reticulum) stress due to its pro-survival property. Up regulated GRP78 expression in tumor cells has been correlated with aggressive malignancies whereas some reports have predicted an improved prognosis. Over-expression of GRP78 in the ER promotes its localization to the cell surface on several cell types including tumor cells. METHODS: In order to elucidate whether GRP78 receptor positive and negative tumor cells manifest different properties in colorectal cancer, we first artificially separated GRP78 positive and negative sub-populations from HM7 and HCT116 cell lines using anti GRP78 antibody coated magnetic beads. RESULTS: Only GRP78 negative cells were highly proliferative, induced significant growth in tumor size in nude mice and metastasized to the liver in a human metastatic colorectal carcinoma model in mice. In contrast, GRP78 positive cells manifested reduced proliferation, colony formation, tumor growth and liver metastases. The reduced tumorigenicity of GRP78 positive subpopulation was abrogated by silencing GRP78 expression using siRNA oligomers. In our efforts to induce cell surface GRP78, we subjected the cells to doxorubicin and taxol that increased significantly the percent of GRP78 positive population. Cells pre-incubated with doxorubicin exhibited reduced proliferation and tumor growth in mice. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the significance of cell surface GRP78 in colon cancer, which may be used as a marker for reduced tumorigenicity.
Authors: Mario Gonzalez-Gronow; Miguel Cuchacovich; Carolina Llanos; Cristian Urzua; Govind Gawdi; Salvatore V Pizzo Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: P M Fernandez; S O Tabbara; L K Jacobs; F C Manning; T N Tsangaris; A M Schwartz; K A Kennedy; S R Patierno Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Heidi LeBlanc; David Lawrence; Eugene Varfolomeev; Klara Totpal; John Morlan; Peter Schow; Sharon Fong; Ralph Schwall; Dominick Sinicropi; Avi Ashkenazi Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Mario Gonzalez-Gronow; Maria Angelica Selim; John Papalas; Salvatore V Pizzo Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Nizar M Mhaidat; Karem H Alzoubi; Omar F Khabour; Mohammed N Banihani; Qosay A Al-Balas; Sulaiman Swaidan Journal: Cytotechnology Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Lihong Mo; Robin E Bachelder; Margaret Kennedy; Po-Han Chen; Jen-Tsan Chi; Andrew Berchuck; George Cianciolo; Salvatore V Pizzo Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Deborah Ryan; Steven Carberry; Áine C Murphy; Andreas U Lindner; Joanna Fay; Suzanne Hector; Niamh McCawley; Orna Bacon; Caoimhin G Concannon; Elaine W Kay; Deborah A McNamara; Jochen H M Prehn Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 5.531