Literature DB >> 2294480

Surgical and electrophysiological observations during clipping of 134 aneurysms with evoked potential monitoring.

J Schramm1, A Koht, G Schmidt, U Pechstein, M Taniguchi, R Fahlbusch.   

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were monitored during 113 operations for the clipping of 134 cerebral aneurysms. Changes in peak latency and amplitude of early cortical SEP as well as central conduction time were evaluated. In 58 cases surgical occlusion of arterial vessels or other events occurred, and in 17 of these cases such events were associated with SEP changes or loss. Arterial occlusions resulted from temporary clipping of a feeding blood vessel (22), accidental clipping of a vessel (12), and intentional permanent vessel occlusion (8). A total SEP loss was seen in 2 cases of accidental vessel occlusion and in 6 cases of temporary vessel clipping. Significant SEP changes were found in 6 patients with temporary clipping, and once each with retraction of the cerebellum, retraction of the middle cerebral artery, and after intentional permanent vessel occlusion. Response to these changes included reapplication of aneurysm clips, repositioning of retractors, or removal of temporary clips. Stable SEP signals during 13 cases allowed the surgeon to proceed with the surgical course. Despite the limitations of SEP monitoring in certain anatomical locations, it has been found to be helpful in the operative management of some cases such as multilobed aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery, giant aneurysms, trapping procedures, and procedures requiring temporary vessel occlusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2294480     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199001000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  11 in total

Review 1.  False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports.

Authors:  H Wiedemayer; I E Sandalcioglu; W Armbruster; J Regel; H Schaefer; D Stolke
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Effects of temporary clips on somatosensory evoked potentials in aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  Uta Schick; Jörg Döhnert; Jan-Jakob Meyer; Hans-Ekkehart Vitzthum
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Authors:  J Richard Toleikis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Early neuropsychological sequelae of aneurysm surgery and subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  B O Hütter; J M Gilsbach
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  The use of electrophysiological monitoring in the intraoperative management of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  J R Lopéz; S D Chang; G K Steinberg
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Risk of stroke with temporary arterial occlusion in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral aneurysm.

Authors:  Sung-Kon Ha; Dong-Jun Lim; Bong-Gil Seok; Se-Hoon Kim; Jung-Yul Park; Yong-Gu Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-07-31

7.  Evoked potential monitoring during posterior fossa aneurysm surgery: a comparison of two modalities.

Authors:  P H Manninen; S Patterson; A M Lam; A W Gelb; W E Nantau
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  A new measure for monitoring intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Jin; Chun Kee Chung; Jeong Eun Kim; Young Doo Choi
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-12-31

9.  How useful is the 3-dimensional, surgeon's perspective-adjusted visualisation of the vessel anatomy during aneurysm surgery? A prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Veit Rohde; Franz-Josef Hans; Lothar Mayfrank; Stephan Dammert; Joachim M Gilsbach; Volker A Coenen
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  Powerline noise elimination in biomedical signals via blind source separation and wavelet analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Akwei-Sekyere
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.