| Literature DB >> 22944294 |
Sylvia Hoeller1, Yi Zhou, Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna, Zijun Y Xu-Monette, Daniela Hoehn, Michel Bihl, Steven H Swerdlow, Andreas Rosenwald, German Ott, Jonathan Said, Cherie H Dunphy, Carlos E Bueso-Ramos, Pei Lin, Michael Wang, Roberto N Miranda, Alexander Tzankov, L Jeffrey Medeiros, Ken H Young.
Abstract
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) share many features and both arise from CD5+ B-cells; their distinction is critical as MCL is a more aggressive neoplasm. Rarely, cases of composite MCL and CLL/SLL have been reported. Little is known about the nature of these cases and, in particular, the clonal relationship of the 2 lymphomas. Eleven composite MCL and CLL/SLL cases were identified. The clinical, morphologic and immunophenotypic features of the MCL and CLL/SLL were characterized. IGH (immunoglobulin heavy chain) gene analysis was performed on microdissected MCL and CLL/SLL components to assess their clonal relationship. Ten patients had lymphadenopathy, and 7 patients had bone marrow involvement. The MCL component had the following growth patterns: in situ (n = 1), mantle zone (n = 3), nodular and diffuse (n = 3), diffuse (n = 3), and interstitial in the bone marrow (the only patient without lymphadenopathy) (n = 1); 6 MCLs had blastoid or pleomorphic and 5 small lymphocytic features. The CLL/SLL component was nodular (n = 9) or diffuse (n = 2). All MCL were CD5(+) and cyclin D1(+) with t(11;14) translocation. All CLL/SLL were CD5(+), CD23(+) and negative for cyclin D1 or t(11;14). IGH gene analysis showed that the MCL and CLL/SLL components displayed different sized fragments, indicating that the MCL and CLL/SLL are likely derived from different neoplastic B-cell clones. The lack of a clonal relationship between the MCL and CLL/SLL components suggests that MCL and CLL/SLL components represent distinct disease processes and do not share a common progenitor B-cell.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22944294 PMCID: PMC3640316 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.04.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Pathol ISSN: 0046-8177 Impact factor: 3.466