| Literature DB >> 22943574 |
Helmut Sinzinger1, Robert Berent.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postprandial hyperlipidemia and hyperglycemia have been related to cardiovascular events. Among different underlying mechanisms platelet activation seems to be responsible too. No comparable data between various tests in normo- vs. hyperlipidemics before and at different time intervals are available after a fat meal. We aimed to compare 9 of them within the same patients at several time points in postprandial hyperlipidemia.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22943574 PMCID: PMC3502288 DOI: 10.1186/1477-9560-10-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thromb J ISSN: 1477-9560
PubMed literature survey
| PP | 16598 |
| PP + PL | 125 |
| PP + PL function | 121 |
| PP + PL aggregation | 48 |
| PP L + PL | 79 |
| PP L + PL function | 79 |
| PP L + PL aggregation | 33 |
| PP G + PL | 38 |
| PP G + PL function | 37 |
| PP G + PL aggregation | 14 |
| PP G + L + PL | 16 |
| PP G + L + PL function | 16 |
| PP G + L + PL aggregation | 6 |
PP … postprandial, PL … platelet, L … lipids, G … glucose.
Prevalues of the platelet function parameters examined
| count | 211 ± 10 | 216 ± 13 | 217 ± 11 | x103/μl |
| ßTG | 51.7 ± 2.2 | 55.6 ± 2.3 | 52.3 ± 2.8 | pg/ml |
| PF4 | 16.6 ± 2.4 | 18.9 ± 2.7 | 18.6 ± 2.5 | pg/ml |
| TXB2 | 7.4 ± 1.3 | 12.8 ± 2.3* | 10.7 ± 1.9* | pg/ml |
| PS PGI2 | 0.96 ± 0.09 | 1.82 ± 0.51* | 1.65 ± 0.22* | ng/ml |
| SI | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.6* | 6.8 ± 2.2* | % |
| WU | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.86 ± 0.04* | 0.78 ± 0.06* | % |
| retention | 88.4 ± 3.2 | 87.1 ± 3.7 | 89.0 ± 3.8 | % |
| migration | 386 ± 21 | 397 ± 26 | 391 ± 22 | mm2 |
values in x ± SD; n = 28 each group (14 m/14 f, aged 31 – 56 years); *) p < 0.01; NL indicates normolipemics; HC, hypercholesterolemics; MS, metabolic syndrome; PS, platelet sensitivity; count, platelet count; ßTG, ß-thrombogloblin; PF4, platelet factor 4; TXB2, thromboxane B2; PS PGI2, platelet sensitivity to prostaglandin I2; SI, sedimentation index; WU, WU-test.
Only TXB2, PS PGI2, SI and the WU-test reveal significant differences between NL vs. HC- and MS-patients, respectively. TXB2 and PS PGI2 seem to be more closely related to cholesterol, SI and the WU-test to TG.
Influence of a fat meal on platelet function parameters
| count | 5.2 (3.3) | 7.5 (2.2)* | 3.1 (1.4) | NL |
| 4.9 (2.6) | 8.3 (2.5)* | 4.2. (1.5) | HC | |
| 5.0 (2.4) | 7.7 (1.8)* | 2.9 (1.3) | MS | |
| ßTG | 1.5 (5.3) | 2.1 (5.0) | 1.0 (3.8) | NL |
| 2.1 (6.3) | 3.0 (7.1) | 2.8 (± 5.4) | HC | |
| 0.7 (8.4) | 1.3 (10.6) | - 0.3 (6.4) | MS | |
| PF4 | 0.7 (5.3) | 2.3 (2.8) | - 1.4 (5.2) | NL |
| 1.3 (4.8) | 2.0 (4.2) | 0.8 (6.3) | HC | |
| 1.1. (3.6) | 1.2 (5.7) | - 1.1 (5.4) | MS | |
| TXB2 | 4.2 (12.2) | 0.3 (6.3) | - 1.3 (3.8) | NL |
| - 0.6 (8.5) | 1.4 (5.4) | 1.7 (6.5) | HC | |
| 2.0 (9.1) | 1.3 (7.5) | - 0.6 (7.1) | MS | |
| PS PGI2 | −1.3 (4.4) | - 0.5 (3.1) | - 0.2 (3.6) | NL |
| 1.0 (2.7) | 0.6 (2.3) | 0.7 (2.7) | HC | |
| - 0.8 (2.5) | 0.9 (3.1) | 1.3 (1.9) | MS | |
| SI | 28.7 (30.3) | 2.1 (20.2) | 3.6 (10.6) | NL |
| 21.4 (17.9) | 0.6 (14.3) | 2.0 (7.5) | HC | |
| 84.6 (25.8)* | 86.3 (21.6)* | 26.8 (13.9)* | MS | |
| WU | 3.4 (4.6) | 2.7 (2.4) | 0.7 (3.4) | NL |
| 2.7 (3.3) | 1.0 (3.1) | 1.6 (2.6) | HC | |
| 3.3 (3.3) | 2.2 (3.7) | 2.5 (4.1) | MS | |
| retention | - 3.1 (6.3) | 4.7 (7.4) | 2.2 (3.9) | NL |
| 2.4 (5.9) | 2.5 (5.8) | 0.4 (6.2) | HC | |
| 4.7 (6.1) | 6.8 (6.0) | 2.1 (4.5) | MS | |
| migration | 1.3 (3.2) | 2.4 (3.4) | 2.0 (3.20 | NL |
| | 2.8 (2.7) | 2.4 (4.0) | 1.7 (2.0) | HC |
| 2.2 (3.8) | 2.0 (3.9) | 1.1 (1.8) | MS |
n = 12 each (6 m/6 f, age 30 – 48 years); values in % vs. prevalue (SD); *) p < 0.01; for abbreviations see Table 2.
A fat meal increases only peripheral platelet count (maximum at 6 hours) in all groups, SI only in MS-patients for up to 16 hours.
ADP-response of washed platelets (WP) vs. in platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
| WP | 3.7 (7.1) | 2.2 (5.4) | 0.6 (4.1) | NL |
| 4.3 (3.3)* | 1.4 (3.8) | - 0.2 (3.3) | HC | |
| 15.3 (6.2)* | 12.7 (6.0)* | 4.7 (2.9) | MS | |
| PRP | - 4.2 (5.3) | - 2.6 (2.4) | 1.0 (1.6) | NL |
| | - 4.0 (3.9) | - 1.1 (2.3) | - 0.4 (0.9) | HC |
| - 13.7 (5.9)* | - 11.6 (3.1)* | - 3.3 (1.5) | MS |
n = 20 each (12 m/8 f, age 30 – 48 years); values in % change (SD) vs. prevalue; WP indicates washed platelets; PRP, platelet-rich plasma; for further abbreviations see Table 2.
Aggregation response is mainly influenced during the initial 3 hours after a meal in MS-patients. In NC and HC the alterations are small and short lasting. In WP there is an in part significant activation, while in PRP turbidity causes a decrease to a comparable extent.
Platelet aggregation in washed platelets vs. platelet-rich plasma in severe familial hypertriglyceridemia
| A.S. 41, ♂ | - 10.6 | - 15.7 | - 17.3 | - 10.8 | - 1.0 | PRP |
| 13.4 | 18.9 | 20.3 | 11.4 | 2.3 | WP | |
| D.R. 37, ♀ | - 9.2 | - 13.7 | - 15.4 | −8.6 | - 0.3 | PRP |
| 12.0 | 16.2 | 17.3 | 10.3 | 0.4 | WP | |
| J.O. 29, ♂ | - 7.6 | - 12.2 | - 12.1 | - 7.6 | - 0.9 | PRP |
| 10.1 | 13.8 | 14.7 | 9.9 | 2.0 | WP | |
| H.M. 54, ♂ | - 11.3 | - 14.7 | - 18.6 | - 11.7 | - 3.3 | PRP |
| 13.0 | 17.2 | 21.1 | 13.0 | 4.1 | WP | |
| D.W. 44, ♂ | - 8.6 | - 9.3 | - 12.9 | - 5.4 | - 1.6 | PRP |
| 11.0 | 12.6 | 15.2 | 8.4 | - 0.3 | WP |
values in % changes vs. prevalue; PRP indicates platelet-rich plasma; WP, washed platelets.
In severe HTG platelet function change induced by ADP is particularly long lasting up to 16 hours. Calculating the group statistics reveals that after 16 hours differences are no longer significant.
Influence of fasting on radiolabelling behaviour of platelets with In-oxine
| LE | 90.6 ± 2.7 | 46.2 ± 3.8* | 86.9 ± 2.9 | 88.8 ± 2.7 | fasting |
| 89.7 ± 2.5 | 46.8 ± 4.3* | 87.5 ± 2.2 | 88.4 ± 1.9 | non-fasting | |
| REC | 68.2 ± 3.0 | 22.7 ± 5.2* | 63.7 ± 5.8 | 67.5 ± 4.0 | fasting |
values in % (mean ± SD); n = 12 each subgroup (6 m/6f); *) p < 0.01 (vs. NL); LE indicates labelling efficiency; REC, recovery; for further abbreviations see Table 2.
Postprandial hyperlipidemia does not affect LE or REC in any of the patient groups.