Literature DB >> 2294344

Mechanical testing of cryopreserved aortic allografts. Comparison with xenografts and fresh tissue.

I Vesely1, L Gonzalez-Lavin, D Graf, D Boughner.   

Abstract

Reports indicate that cryopreserved aortic valve allografts have a better long-term survivability than other bioprostheses, such as the porcine xenograft. Unlike xenografts, allograft valves do not require treatment with glutaraldehyde and may therefore retain much of their original mechanical function. The effects of cryopreservation on the mechanical integrity of collagen fibers and mucopolysaccharides, however, are still largely unknown. We therefore compared the mechanical behavior of cryopreserved allograft leaflet material to that of fresh tissue and xenografts by measuring their bending stiffness (nine strips of tissue) and their uniaxial tensile stress/strain and stress/relaxation behavior (six strips of each tissue type). The bending tests showed no significant difference between the pliability of cryopreserved allografts and fresh pig aortic valve tissue, but the xenograft material was significantly stiffer than both (p less than 0.001). The mean circumferential tensile elastic moduli of the allografts, fresh tissue, and xenografts at a stress of 300 kPa were 9.1 +/- 5.4 MPa, 13.0 +/- 1.7 MPa, and 12.5 +/- 3.0 MPa, respectively, and were not significantly different from each other. We also found that the transition from a low to a high modulus on the stress/strain curves, a measure of extensibility, occurs at 23%, 22%, and 12% strain for the three materials. There was no significant difference between the allograft and the fresh tissues, but the xenograft material was less extensible than the other two (p less than 0.001). The xenograft tissue also had significantly lower rates of stress relaxation than the other two materials (p less than 0.005). Thus no detectable differences were found between the mechanical behavior of the cryopreserved allograft aortic leaflets and fresh tissue, whereas the xenograft material was less extensible and less capable of relaxing than both the allograft and fresh tissue. The ability of allografts valves to respond to tensile and flexural stresses in a manner similar to that of the natural aortic valve may therefore contribute to their good in vivo survivability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2294344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

1.  One-dimensional experimental mechanical characterisation of porcine aortic root wall.

Authors:  C Ferraresi; A M Bertetto; L Mazza; D Maffiodo; W Franco
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Planar biaxial behavior of fibrin-based tissue-engineered heart valve leaflets.

Authors:  Paul S Robinson; Robert T Tranquillo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Guidance for removal of fetal bovine serum from cryopreserved heart valve processing.

Authors:  Kelvin G M Brockbank; Albert E Heacox; Katja Schenke-Layland
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.481

4.  Comparison and evaluation of biomechanical, electrical, and biological methods for assessment of damage to tissue collagen.

Authors:  R Glenn Hepfer; Kelvin G M Brockbank; Zhen Chen; Elizabeth D Greene; Lia H Campbell; Gregory J Wright; Alyce Linthurst-Jones; Hai Yao
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 1.522

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.