Literature DB >> 22942870

European regulation affecting nanomaterials - review of limitations and future recommendations.

Steffen Foss Hansen1, Anders Baun.   

Abstract

After learning about the potential risks associated with various specific nanomaterials, concerns have been raised about adequacy of existing regulation in Europe and what should be done to address any potential regulatory gaps related to nanomaterials. Understanding the limitations of the current regulation in regard to nanomaterials is a starting point in a democratic and transparent process towards adapting existing laws and facilitating an informed discussion about which kind of regulatory options best address the identified limitations. In the following we will introduce key pieces of European legislation affecting nanomaterials, analyze their limitations, and provide a number of recommendations on how these can be overcome. We find that, although nanomaterials are in principle covered by the scope of many of the existing legislative frameworks, it is often unclear, if current regulations are actually applicable when it comes to specific nanomaterials and their diverse applications. Main limitations seem to be: that requirements to do safety evaluations are triggered by production volumes by tonnage not tailored to the nanoscale, the profound lack of (eco)toxicological data, and that thresholds values and occupational exposure limits cannot be established with existing methodologies.

Keywords:  European legislation; Nanomaterials; REACH; cosmetics; food laws; pharmaceutical regulation; waste directives; worker safety directives

Year:  2011        PMID: 22942870      PMCID: PMC3430398          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.10-029.Hansen

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  19 in total

1.  Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Andrew Maynard; Ken Donaldson; Vincent Castranova; Julie Fitzpatrick; Kevin Ausman; Janet Carter; Barbara Karn; Wolfgang Kreyling; David Lai; Stephen Olin; Nancy Monteiro-Riviere; David Warheit; Hong Yang
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 9.400

2.  Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures.

Authors:  Samuel Y Paik; David M Zalk; Paul Swuste
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2008-07-16

Review 3.  Ecotoxicology of human pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Karl Fent; Anna A Weston; Daniel Caminada
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Pulmonary bioassay studies with nanoscale and fine-quartz particles in rats: toxicity is not dependent upon particle size but on surface characteristics.

Authors:  David B Warheit; Thomas R Webb; Vicki L Colvin; Kenneth L Reed; Christie M Sayes
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Enhanced bioaccumulation of cadmium in carp in the presence of titanium dioxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Xuezhi Zhang; Hongwen Sun; Zhiyan Zhang; Qian Niu; Yongsheng Chen; John C Crittenden
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation.

Authors:  Chiu-Wing Lam; John T James; Richard McCluskey; Robert L Hunter
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Limits and prospects of the "incremental approach" and the European legislation on the management of risks related to nanomaterials.

Authors:  Antonio Franco; Steffen Foss Hansen; Stig Irving Olsen; Luciano Butti
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 8.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Instillation of six different ultrafine carbon particles indicates a surface area threshold dose for acute lung inflammation in mice.

Authors:  Tobias Stoeger; Claudia Reinhard; Shinji Takenaka; Andreas Schroeppel; Erwin Karg; Baerbel Ritter; Joachim Heyder; Holger Schulz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Inflammatory response to TiO2 and carbonaceous particles scales best with BET surface area.

Authors:  Tobias Stoeger; Otmar Schmid; Shinji Takenaka; Holger Schulz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.

Authors:  Quinn T Birch; Phillip M Potter; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 8.044

2.  Scientists' Understandings of Risk of Nanomaterials: Disciplinary Culture Through the Ethnographic Lens.

Authors:  Mikael Johansson; Åsa Boholm
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 0.917

Review 3.  The Pros and Cons of the Use of Laser Ablation Synthesis for the Production of Silver Nano-Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Sportelli; Margherita Izzi; Annalisa Volpe; Maurizio Clemente; Rosaria Anna Picca; Antonio Ancona; Pietro Mario Lugarà; Gerardo Palazzo; Nicola Cioffi
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-28

Review 4.  Sunscreens: UV filters to protect us: Part 2-Increasing awareness of UV filters and their potential toxicities to us and our environment.

Authors:  David Fivenson; Nina Sabzevari; Sultan Qiblawi; Jason Blitz; Benjamin B Norton; Scott A Norton
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2020-09-09

5.  Molecular stress responses to nano-sized zero-valent iron (nZVI) particles in the soil bacterium Pseudomonas stutzeri.

Authors:  Maria Ludovica Saccà; Carmen Fajardo; Montserrat Martinez-Gomariz; Gonzalo Costa; Mar Nande; Margarita Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Environmental exposure assessment framework for nanoparticles in solid waste.

Authors:  Alessio Boldrin; Steffen Foss Hansen; Anders Baun; Nanna Isabella Bloch Hartmann; Thomas Fruergaard Astrup
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Ultrastructural interactions and genotoxicity assay of cerium dioxide nanoparticles on mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Blandine Courbiere; Mélanie Auffan; Raphaël Rollais; Virginie Tassistro; Aurélie Bonnefoy; Alain Botta; Jérôme Rose; Thierry Orsière; Jeanne Perrin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.