PURPOSE: Whether lifetime abstainer's antisocial behavior are maladjusted or well-adjusted is unresolved. The aim of this study was to compare abstainers (defined as persons with no lifetime use of alcohol and other drugs and non-engagement in antisocial or delinquent behavior) with non-abstainers across a range of sociodemographic and mental health characteristics in the United States. METHODS: Data were derived from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Structured psychiatric interviews (N = 43,093) using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule - DSM-IV version (AUDADIS-IV) were completed by trained lay interviewers between 2001 and 2002. RESULTS: The prevalence of abstaining was 11%. Abstainers were significantly more likely to be female, Asian and African-American, born outside the U.S., and less likely to be unemployed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that abstainers were significantly less likely to evidence lifetime mood, anxiety, or personality disorder compared to non-abstainers. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that abstainers are not maladapted and are comparatively more functional than non-abstainers.
PURPOSE: Whether lifetime abstainer's antisocial behavior are maladjusted or well-adjusted is unresolved. The aim of this study was to compare abstainers (defined as persons with no lifetime use of alcohol and other drugs and non-engagement in antisocial or delinquent behavior) with non-abstainers across a range of sociodemographic and mental health characteristics in the United States. METHODS: Data were derived from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Structured psychiatric interviews (N = 43,093) using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule - DSM-IV version (AUDADIS-IV) were completed by trained lay interviewers between 2001 and 2002. RESULTS: The prevalence of abstaining was 11%. Abstainers were significantly more likely to be female, Asian and African-American, born outside the U.S., and less likely to be unemployed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that abstainers were significantly less likely to evidence lifetime mood, anxiety, or personality disorder compared to non-abstainers. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that abstainers are not maladapted and are comparatively more functional than non-abstainers.
Authors: Michael G Vaughn; Qiang Fu; Matt DeLisi; Kevin M Beaver; Brian E Perron; Matthew O Howard Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Bridget F Grant; Deborah A Dawson; Frederick S Stinson; Patricia S Chou; Ward Kay; Roger Pickering Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2003-07-20 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Michael G Vaughn; Matt Delisi; Tracy Gunterbh; Qiang Fu; Kevin M Beaver; Brian E Perron; Matthew O Howard Journal: J Crim Justice Date: 2011-01-13
Authors: Michael G Vaughn; Qiang Fu; Matt DeLisi; Kevin M Beaver; Brian E Perron; Katie Terrell; Matthew O Howard Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Michael G Vaughn; Christopher P Salas-Wright; Matt DeLisi; Zhengmin Qian Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Christopher P Salas-Wright; Trenette C Goings; Michael G Vaughn; Mariana Cohen; Patricia Andrade; Augusto Pérez Gómez; Maria Duque; Juliana Mejía Trujillo; Mildred M Maldonado-Molina; Seth J Schwartz Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Christopher P Salas-Wright; Audrey Hang Hai; Sehun Oh; Abdulaziz Alsolami; Michael G Vaughn Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Michael G Vaughn; Christopher P Salas-Wright; Sandra Naeger; Jin Huang; Alex R Piquero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 3.390