Literature DB >> 22941943

Diffeomorphic susceptibility artifact correction of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images.

L Ruthotto1, H Kugel, J Olesch, B Fischer, J Modersitzki, M Burger, C H Wolters.   

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a key investigation technique in modern neuroscience. In clinical settings, diffusion-weighted imaging and its extension to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are usually performed applying the technique of echo-planar imaging (EPI). EPI is the commonly available ultrafast acquisition technique for single-shot acquisition with spatial encoding in a Cartesian system. A drawback of these sequences is their high sensitivity against small perturbations of the magnetic field, caused, e.g., by differences in magnetic susceptibility of soft tissue, bone and air. The resulting magnetic field inhomogeneities thus cause geometrical distortions and intensity modulations in diffusion-weighted images. This complicates the fusion with anatomical T1- or T2-weighted MR images obtained with conventional spin- or gradient-echo images and negligible distortion. In order to limit the degradation of diffusion-weighted MR data, we present here a variational approach based on a reference scan pair with reversed polarity of the phase- and frequency-encoding gradients and hence reversed distortion. The key novelty is a tailored nonlinear regularization functional to obtain smooth and diffeomorphic transformations. We incorporate the physical distortion model into a variational image registration framework and derive an accurate and fast correction algorithm. We evaluate the applicability of our approach to distorted DTI brain scans of six healthy volunteers. For all datasets, the automatic correction algorithm considerably reduced the image degradation. We show that, after correction, fusion with T1- or T2-weighted images can be obtained by a simple rigid registration. Furthermore, we demonstrate the improvement due to the novel regularization scheme. Most importantly, we show that it provides meaningful, i.e. diffeomorphic, geometric transformations, independent of the actual choice of the regularization parameters.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941943     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/18/5715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  39 in total

Review 1.  Advanced neuroimaging applied to veterans and service personnel with traumatic brain injury: state of the art and potential benefits.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Wilde; Sylvain Bouix; David F Tate; Alexander P Lin; Mary R Newsome; Brian A Taylor; James R Stone; James Montier; Samuel E Gandy; Brian Biekman; Martha E Shenton; Gerald York
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  3D GRASE pulsed arterial spin labeling at multiple inflow times in patients with long arterial transit times: comparison with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Steve Z Martin; Vince I Madai; Federico C von Samson-Himmelstjerna; Matthias A Mutke; Miriam Bauer; Cornelius X Herzig; Stefan Hetzer; Matthias Günther; Jan Sobesky
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  A retrospective evaluation of automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters.

Authors:  Johannes Vorwerk; Andrea A Brock; Daria N Anderson; John D Rolston; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Symplectomorphic registration with phase space regularization by entropy spectrum pathways.

Authors:  Vitaly L Galinsky; Lawrence R Frank
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  The role of diffusion tensor imaging in detecting microstructural changes in prodromal Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Yun Xu; Bin Zhu; Kejal Kantarci
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.243

6.  Four in vivo g-ratio-weighted imaging methods: Comparability and repeatability at the group level.

Authors:  Isabel Ellerbrock; Siawoosh Mohammadi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  DR-BUDDI (Diffeomorphic Registration for Blip-Up blip-Down Diffusion Imaging) method for correcting echo planar imaging distortions.

Authors:  M Okan Irfanoglu; Pooja Modi; Amritha Nayak; Elizabeth B Hutchinson; Joelle Sarlls; Carlo Pierpaoli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A LAGRANGIAN GAUSS-NEWTON-KRYLOV SOLVER FOR MASS- AND INTENSITY-PRESERVING DIFFEOMORPHIC IMAGE REGISTRATION.

Authors:  Andreas Mang; Lars Ruthotto
Journal:  SIAM J Sci Comput       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Anodic stimulation misunderstood: preferential activation of fiber orientations with anodic waveforms in deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Gordon Duffley; Johannes Vorwerk; Alan D Dorval; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for single-shot EPI at 7T.

Authors:  Uten Yarach; Myung-Ho In; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Berkin Bilgic; Frank Godenschweger; Hendrik Mattern; Alessandro Sciarra; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.