Literature DB >> 22941942

Molecular analysis of cell type-specific gene expression profile during mouse spermatogenesis by laser microdissection and qRT-PCR.

Prabagaran Esakky1, Deborah A Hansen, Andrea M Drury, Kelle H Moley.   

Abstract

Laser microdissection (LMD) is a selective cell isolation technique that enables the separation of desired homogenous cell subpopulations from complex tissues such as the testes under direct microscopic visualization. The LMD accompanied by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) represents an indispensable tool in quantifying messenger RNA (mRNA) expression among defined cell populations. Gene expression is temporally and spatially regulated at 3 sequential phases of mitotic, meiotic, and postmeiotic stages of spermatogenesis. The present study demonstrates a short modified LMD protocol based upon hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Stage-specific LMD success was validated by the use of mRNA profiling of "marker genes" which are conserved across species and are known to be differentially expressed during spermatogenesis. Magea4, Hspa2, Cox6b2, Tnp1, Prm1, and Prm2 are used to differentiate among the microdissected cell populations, namely spermatogonia (group I), spermatocytes (group II), round and condensing spermatids (group III), and elongated and condensed spermatids (group IV), respectively. The LMD combined with qRT-PCR is further extended to assess the cell stage-specific distribution of selected stress response genes such as Hsp90aa1, Gpx4, Ucp2, Sod1, and Sod2. The germ cell-specific mRNA profiles are suitably complemented by Western blot of the LMD samples, immunohistochemistry, and confocal localization of the corresponding proteins. The current study suggests that LMD can successfully isolate cell subpopulations from the complex tissues of the testes; and establish cell stage-specific basal expression patterns of selected stress response genes and proteins. It is our hypothesis that the baseline expression of stress response genes will differ by cell stage to create discrete stage-specific vulnerabilities to reproductive toxicants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941942     DOI: 10.1177/1933719112452939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  8 in total

1.  CircNAPEPLD is expressed in human and murine spermatozoa and physically interacts with oocyte miRNAs.

Authors:  Marco Ragusa; Davide Barbagallo; Teresa Chioccarelli; Francesco Manfrevola; Gilda Cobellis; Cinzia Di Pietro; Duilia Brex; Rosalia Battaglia; Silvia Fasano; Bruno Ferraro; Carolina Sellitto; Concetta Ambrosino; Luca Roberto; Michele Purrello; Riccardo Pierantoni; Rosanna Chianese
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Modeling the effect of cigarette smoke on hexose utilization in spermatocytes.

Authors:  Kenan Omurtag; Prabagaran Esakky; Brian J Debosch; Erica L Schoeller; Maggie M Chi; Kelle H Moley
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Maternal Obesity, Cage Density, and Age Contribute to Prostate Hyperplasia in Mice.

Authors:  Emily C Benesh; Jeff Gill; Laura E Lamb; Kelle H Moley
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Zika virus infection damages the testes in mice.

Authors:  Jennifer Govero; Prabagaran Esakky; Suzanne M Scheaffer; Estefania Fernandez; Andrea Drury; Derek J Platt; Matthew J Gorman; Justin M Richner; Elizabeth A Caine; Vanessa Salazar; Kelle H Moley; Michael S Diamond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Exposure to maternal obesogenic diet worsens some but not all pre-cancer phenotypes in a murine genetic model of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theresa Okeyo-Owuor; Emily Benesh; Scott Bibbey; Michaela Reid; Jacques Halabi; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Kelle Moley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparative expression profiling of testis-enriched genes regulated during the development of spermatogonial cells.

Authors:  Jinsoo Ahn; Yoo-Jin Park; Paula Chen; Tae Jin Lee; Young-Jun Jeon; Carlo M Croce; Yeunsu Suh; Seongsoo Hwang; Woo-Sung Kwon; Myung-Geol Pang; Cheorl-Ho Kim; Sang Suk Lee; Kichoon Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Is transcription in sperm stationary or dynamic?

Authors:  Xiaoxia Ren; Xiaoli Chen; Zhenling Wang; Dong Wang
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Maternal high-fat diet induces hyperproliferation and alters Pten/Akt signaling in prostates of offspring.

Authors:  Emily C Benesh; Peter A Humphrey; Qiang Wang; Kelle H Moley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.