Literature DB >> 22941520

Comparison of extractable DNA from bone following six-month exposure to outdoor conditions, garden loam, mold contamination or room storage.

Loïc Startari1, Jean-Noël Benoit, Gérald Quatrehomme, Georges Carle, Philippe Pognonec.   

Abstract

Femur bone sections from a single donor were exposed for six months to (i) outdoor conditions (exposure to sun, rain, etc.); (ii) water-vapour saturated environment favourable to mould proliferation and (iii) humic-garden soil. Following these treatments, DNA was extracted and yields were compared with that of a control bone fragment kept under optimal laboratory storage conditions. Our results demonstrate that both mould and soil are very detrimental to bone DNA conservation since more than 97% of the bone DNA was lost in these samples as compared with the control condition. Outdoor exposure gives an intermediate result with 30% of the DNA still present in the bone. Thus, environments favourable to microorganisms proliferation appear detrimental to bone DNA conservation and are a bad prognostic should bone remains be used for genetic identification purpose. Comparatively, open-air exposure is much more favourable to bone DNA analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941520     DOI: 10.1258/msl.2012.012018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Law        ISSN: 0025-8024            Impact factor:   1.266


  1 in total

Review 1.  Disaster victim identification operations with fragmented, burnt, or commingled remains: experience-based recommendations.

Authors:  Hans H de Boer; Julie Roberts; Tania Delabarde; Amy Z Mundorff; Soren Blau
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2020-05-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.