Literature DB >> 22941361

Mild electrical pulse current stimulation upregulates S100A4 and promotes cardiogenesis in MSC and cardiac myocytes coculture monolayer.

Lei Wen1, Changhai Zhang, Yaoming Nong, Qing Yao, Zhiyuan Song.   

Abstract

Parietal endoderm-secreted S100A4 promotes early cardiomyogenesis in embryoid bodies [1]. After an acute ischemic event, S100A4 protein appears in cardiac myocytes only in the border zone in rat and human hearts [2]. In wound research, a large outward current of 4 μA/cm(2) was always measured at the wound edges of rat cornea and human skin [3]. We hypothesize that a special electrical circumstance at the border zone may contribute to the phenomenon. An electric stimulation system was designed to give the cells electric pulse current stimulation (EPCS), the feature of the signal is pulse polarity altered one after another, rectangular 2 ms, 2 Hz, 40 μA. This intensity of stimulation is proved to be safe to cardiac myocytes (both in structure and beating behavior compared with the cardiac myocytes which do not receive stimulation) and MSCs (in cell vitality, proliferation, cell cycle, and gap junction generation potential) through our previous work. Canine MSCs are capable of generating voltage-sensitive Ca(2+) channel and Na(+) channels and generating the Ca(2+) handling system during differentiation. We found that CD44 was reduced in the MSCs monolayer treated with EPCS, compared with non-stimulated MSCs; and EPCS MSCs (3 h/day, 6 h/day, 5 days) showed an 14.04 ± 3.44 and 14.55 ± 3.97 % reduction in CD44, compared with the cotemporary MSCs; these reveal that CD44 reduction amplitude is not correlated with time for EPCS disposure and CD29 (integrin β1) expression is not affected by EPCS exposure. EPCS was given to the MSCs and cardiac myocytes coculture monolayer (ratio 3:1) for different time (1, 3, and 6 h/day) for 4 days to see the biological effects. Gap junction protein and troponin T show an increase after EPCS. We found that the gap junction protein Cx43 increased with treating time-in the EPCS group, it exhibited 1.5 and 1.7 fold in the 3 h/day group and 6 h/day group (P < 0.01), and troponin T exhibited to about 3.6 and 4.4 fold in the 3 h/day group (P < 0.01) and 6 h/day group (P < 0.05). Since coculture was used as stimuli, immunofluorescence was used to visualize the changes during EPCS for the purpose of elucidating the impact of EPCS on cardiac myocytes and MSCs. We found that after 5 days exposure, EPCS can enhance the expression of S100A4, which is 2.33 fold in cardiac myocytes (P < 0.01) and 1.99 fold in MSCs (P < 0.01) in gray value. A significant increasing expression of the myocyte enhancer factor (MEF) and GATA4 is detected in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes (P < 0.01) compared with cotemporary coculture monolayer in the control group. Also, EPCS can trigger the assembly of MEF2c in the nuclei. In addition, more cardiac myocytes were found to have two nuclei. But MSCs fail to active MEF2C transcriptional factor like that in cardiac myocytes after EPCS exposure. The elevation of MEF2 in both cytoplasm and nuclei of cardiac myocytes can always make a clear distinction of the cardiac myocytes and MSCs in coculture. Some factors show strong upregulation tendency with EPCS in both cardiac myocytes and MSCs-these include the troponin T (P < 0.01) and Cx43 (P < 0.05) in cardiac myocytes, and troponin T (P < 0.01) and Cx43 (P < 0.01) in MSCs. Collagen I expression is not affected with EPCS. In conclusion, mild EPCS can upregulate the secretion of S100A4 in both cardiac myocytes and MSCs, which is a factor supporting the cardiomyogenesis and angiogenesis; it further triggers the development of neonatal rat cardiac myocytes through upregulation of MEF2C and GATA4, the number of cardiac myocytes with two nuclei increases with EPCS, but this phenomenon does not appear in MSCs. Despite this, Cx43 and troponin T in both cardiac myocytes and MSCs are very sensitive to EPCS. EPCS can act as an effective and multi-targeted physical intervention method in cardiomyogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22941361     DOI: 10.1007/s12013-012-9402-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 1085-9195            Impact factor:   2.194


  7 in total

1.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cardiology.

Authors:  Ian A White; Cristina Sanina; Wayne Balkan; Joshua M Hare
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

2.  Neural EGF-like protein 1 (NELL-1): Signaling crosstalk in mesenchymal stem cells and applications in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Mikhail Pakvasa; Alex Alverdy; Sami Mostafa; Eric Wang; Lucy Fu; Alexander Li; Leonardo Oliveira; Aravind Athiviraham; Michael J Lee; Jennifer Moriatis Wolf; Tong-Chuan He; Guillermo A Ameer; Russell R Reid
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2017-08-03

3.  Targeting AXL and RAGE to prevent geminin overexpression-induced triple-negative breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Daniel Ryan; Jim Koziol; Wael M ElShamy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Electrical Stimulation and Cellular Behaviors in Electric Field in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Shiyun Meng; Mahmoud Rouabhia; Ze Zhang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Electric pulse current stimulation increases electrophysiological properties of If current reconstructed in mHCN4-transfected canine mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Feng; Shouming Luo; Pan Yang; Zhiyuan Song
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Shox2 influences mesenchymal stem cell fate in a co-culture model in vitro.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Feng; Pan Yang; Shouming Luo; Zhihui Zhang; Huakang Li; Ping Zhu; Zhiyuan Song
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.952

7.  S100A4 as a Target of the E3-Ligase Asb2β and Its Effect on Engineered Heart Tissue.

Authors:  Simon Braumann; Tilo Thottakara; Sabrina Stücker; Silke Reischmann-Düsener; Elisabeth Krämer; Julia Groß; Marc N Hirt; Shirin Doroudgar; Lucie Carrier; Felix W Friedrich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.