Literature DB >> 22941353

Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy using the Capio suture-capturing device versus traditional technique: feasibility and outcome.

Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore1, Franco Alessandri, Valentino Remorgida, Pier Luigi Venturini, Simone Ferrero.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compares the feasibility and outcome of sacrospinous colpopexy for treating vaginal vault prolapse (VVP) performed by either the traditional technique or a simplified procedure using the Capio™ suture-capturing device.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with VVP were included in the study. Forty-two patients were treated by traditional sacrospinous colpopexy (TSC group) and 44 patients were treated by the modified technique using the Capio device (CSC group). Additional procedures were performed to restore concomitant pelvic floor defects.
RESULTS: The mean (±SD) total operative time was significantly lower in the CSC group (71.7 ± 24.5 min) than in the TSC group (105.5 ± 31.5 min; p < 0.001); the intraoperative blood loss was higher in the TSC group than in the CSC group. In the CSC group, the mean operative time required to perform sacrospinous colpopexy was 21.4 ± 3.2 min. In patients who underwent only sacrospinous colpopexy, the time required to perform surgery was significantly lower in the CSC group (20.9 ± 3.3 min) than in the TSC group (39.1 ± 5.2 min; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of surgical complications between the two study groups. The objective and subjective success rates at 3-year follow-up were 88.1 and 92.9 % in the TSC group while in the CSC group they were 86.4 and 92.9 %.
CONCLUSION: The modified technique of sacrospinous ligament fixation using the Capio device reduces the operative time and blood loss when compared to the traditional technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941353     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2540-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  8 in total

Review 1.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Shveta Kapoor; Kanapathippillai Sivanesan; Jessica Amy Robertson; Mayooran Veerasingham; Vishal Kapoor
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The resurrection of sacrospinous fixation: unilateral apical sling hysteropexy.

Authors:  Dmitry Shkarupa; Nikita Kubin; Ekaterina Shapovalova; Anastasya Zaytseva
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Patient-reported outcomes after sacrospinous fixation of vault prolapse with a suturing device: a retrospective national cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer Campbell; Corinne Pedroletti; Linn Ekhed; Emil Nüssler; Annika Strandell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Transvaginal rectocele repair with human dermal allograft interposition and bilateral sacrospinous fixation with a minimum eight-year follow-up.

Authors:  Serge P Marinkovic; Scott Hughes; Donghua Xie; Lisa M Gillen; Christina M Marinkovic
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 6.  The Novel and Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities for Female Pelvic Floor Muscle Dysfunction; Beyond the Traditional

Authors:  Yiğit Akın; Matthew Young; Muhammad Elmussareh; Nickolaus Charalampogiannis; Ali Serdar Gözen
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.021

7.  Anatomical Study of the Variants of the Extrapelvic Part of the Pudendal Nerve.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranjan; Camellia Chanda; Rajesh Kushwaha; Alka Rashmi Nag
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-22

8.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Sascha F M Schulten; Renée J Detollenaere; Jelle Stekelenburg; Joanna IntHout; Kirsten B Kluivers; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-09-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.