Literature DB >> 22941233

Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Jong Won Kim1, Whan Sik Kim, Jae-Ho Cheong, Woo Jin Hyung, Seung-Ho Choi, Sung Hoon Noh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fast-track surgery has been shown to enhance postoperative recovery in several surgical fields. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.
METHODS: The present study was designed as a single-center, randomized, unblinded, parallel-group trial. Patients were eligible if they had gastric cancer for which laparoscopic distal gastrectomy was indicated. The fast-track surgery protocol included intensive preoperative education, a short duration of fasting, a preoperative carbohydrate load, early postoperative ambulation, early feeding, and sufficient pain control using local anesthetics perfused via a local anesthesia pump device, with limited use of opioids. The primary endpoint was the duration of possible and actual postoperative hospital stay.
RESULTS: We randomized 47 patients into a fast-track group (n=22) and a conventional pathway group (n=22), with three patients withdrawn. The possible and actual postoperative hospital stays were shorter in the fast-track group than in the conventional group (4.68±0.65 vs. 7.05±0.65; P<0.001 and 5.36±1.46 vs. 7.95±1.98; P<0.001). The time to first flatus and pain intensity were not different between groups; however, a greater frequency of additional pain control was needed in the conventional group (3.64±3.66 vs. 1.64±1.33; P=0.023). The fast-track group was superior to the conventional group in several factors of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, including: fatigue, appetite loss, financial problems, and anxiety. The complication and readmission rates were similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Fast-track surgery could enhance postoperative recovery, improve immediate postoperative quality of life, and be safely applied in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941233     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1741-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  38 in total

Review 1.  Balanced analgesia: what is it and what are its advantages in postoperative pain?

Authors:  H Kehlet; M Werner; F Perkins
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Early oral nutrition after elective colorectal surgery: influence of balanced analgesia and enforced mobilization.

Authors:  Morten Gaarden Henriksen; Henriette V Hansen; Ib Hessov
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.008

3.  Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care.

Authors:  Linda Basse; Jens Erik Thorbøl; Kristine Løssl; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection.

Authors:  K C H Fearon; O Ljungqvist; M Von Meyenfeldt; A Revhaug; C H C Dejong; K Lassen; J Nygren; J Hausel; M Soop; J Andersen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery.

Authors:  J Andersen; D Hjort-Jakobsen; P S Christiansen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Effects of early oral feeding on surgical outcomes and recovery after curative surgery for gastric cancer: pilot study results.

Authors:  Hoon Hur; Yoon Si; Won Kyung Kang; Wook Kim; Hae Myung Jeon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Assessment of pain by face scales after gastrectomy: comparison of laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hideki Kawamura; Shigenori Homma; Ryoichi Yokota; Hiroshi Watarai; Kentaro Yokota; Yukifumi Kondo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Assessment of quality of life after gastrectomy using EORTC QLQ-C30 and STO22.

Authors:  Daisuke Kobayashi; Yasuhiro Kodera; Michitaka Fujiwara; Masahiko Koike; Goro Nakayama; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Intravenous ondansetron for the control of opioid-induced nausea and vomiting. International S3AA3013 Study Group.

Authors:  G Sussman; J Shurman; M R Creed; L S Larsen; T Ferrer-Brechner; D Noll; J Allegra; R Montgomery; D Schreck; E Grafstein; G Ramalanjaona; V Patel; J Ducharme; P Ortenwall; E Foster; M Ames
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 10.  [Gastric cancer screening and diagnosis].

Authors:  Il Ju Choi
Journal:  Korean J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08
View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tian-Gen Ni; Han-Teng Yang; Hao Zhang; Hai-Peng Meng; Bo Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Enhancing surgical performance outcomes through process-driven care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Rajesh Aggarwal; Pritam Singh; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Yu; Cheng-Le Zhuang; Xing-Zhao Ye; Chang-Jing Zhang; Qian-Tong Dong; Bi-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  The earlier the better?

Authors:  Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  Evidence or eminence in abdominal surgery: recent improvements in perioperative care.

Authors:  Josefin Segelman; Jonas Nygren
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  A meta-analysis of fast track surgery for patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.

Authors:  S Chen; Z Zou; F Chen; Z Huang; G Li
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs for Liver Resection: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Guoqun Zheng; Wenlong Zhang; Fabiao Zhang; Shangdong Lv; Aidong Wang; Zheping Fang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery improves short-term outcomes for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ryo Tanaka; Sang-Woong Lee; Masaru Kawai; Keitaro Tashiro; Satoshi Kawashima; Syuji Kagota; Kotaro Honda; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Laparoscopic Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction Improves Postoperative Outcomes: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Andreou; Sebastian Knitter; Sascha Chopra; Christian Denecke; Moritz Schmelzle; Benjamin Struecker; Ann-Christin Heilmann; Johanna Spenke; Tobias Hofmann; Peter C Thuss-Patience; Marcus Bahra; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Biebl
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Fast-track program vs traditional care in surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Xing Chen; Ae-Huey Jennifer Liu; Ying Cen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.