BACKGROUND: The significance of tumor markers in patients with appendiceal carcinomatosis is poorly defined. We determined preoperative and postoperative tumor marker levels in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) and examined their association with clinicopathologic features and survival. METHODS: A total of 176 patients undergoing attempted CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal carcinomatosis had at least 1 tumor marker measured. Marker levels were correlated with tumor characteristics and oncologic outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify prognostic factors affecting progression and survival. RESULTS: At least 1 marker was elevated prior to CRS/HIPEC in 70 % of patients (CEA, 54.1 %; CA19-9, 47.7 %; CA-125, 47.2 %). Among patients with elevated preoperative marker levels, normalization occurred postoperatively in 79.4 % for CEA, 92.3 % for CA19-9, and 60 % for CA-125. Absolute preoperative tumor marker levels correlated with peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) (p < .0002), and the number of elevated markers was associated with PCI and progression-free survival (PFS). Elevated postoperative CEA level was associated with decreased PFS (median, 13 vs 36 months, p = .0008). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, elevated preoperative CA19-9 was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 1.5-5.3, p = .0008), whereas elevated CA-125 was associated with shorter overall survival (HR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.3-5.4, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with appendiceal carcinomatosis will have at least 1 elevated tumor marker and will normalize following CRS/HIPEC, allowing for ongoing surveillance. CA19-9 is a promising biomarker for early progression following CRS/HIPEC, whereas CA-125 is associated with shorter survival.
BACKGROUND: The significance of tumor markers in patients with appendiceal carcinomatosis is poorly defined. We determined preoperative and postoperative tumor marker levels in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) and examined their association with clinicopathologic features and survival. METHODS: A total of 176 patients undergoing attempted CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal carcinomatosis had at least 1 tumor marker measured. Marker levels were correlated with tumor characteristics and oncologic outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify prognostic factors affecting progression and survival. RESULTS: At least 1 marker was elevated prior to CRS/HIPEC in 70 % of patients (CEA, 54.1 %; CA19-9, 47.7 %; CA-125, 47.2 %). Among patients with elevated preoperative marker levels, normalization occurred postoperatively in 79.4 % for CEA, 92.3 % for CA19-9, and 60 % for CA-125. Absolute preoperative tumor marker levels correlated with peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) (p < .0002), and the number of elevated markers was associated with PCI and progression-free survival (PFS). Elevated postoperative CEA level was associated with decreased PFS (median, 13 vs 36 months, p = .0008). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, elevated preoperative CA19-9 was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 1.5-5.3, p = .0008), whereas elevated CA-125 was associated with shorter overall survival (HR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.3-5.4, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with appendiceal carcinomatosis will have at least 1 elevated tumor marker and will normalize following CRS/HIPEC, allowing for ongoing surveillance. CA19-9 is a promising biomarker for early progression following CRS/HIPEC, whereas CA-125 is associated with shorter survival.
Authors: Frances Austin; Arun Mavanur; Magesh Sathaiah; Jennifer Steel; Diana Lenzner; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Matthew Holtzman; Steven Ahrendt; James Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Robert F Bradley; John H Stewart; Gregory B Russell; Edward A Levine; Kim R Geisinger Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: C Pablo Carmignani; Regina Hampton; Christina E Sugarbaker; David Chang; Paul H Sugarbaker Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: John H Stewart; Perry Shen; Gregory B Russell; Robert F Bradley; Jonathan C Hundley; Brian L Loggie; Kim R Geisinger; Edward A Levine Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-03-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Nadege Fackche; Ryan K Schmocker; Boateng Kubi; Jordan M Cloyd; Ahmed Ahmed; Travis Grotz; Jennifer Leiting; Keith Fournier; Andrew J Lee; Benjamin Powers; Sean Dineen; Jula Veerapong; Joel M Baumgartner; Callisia Clarke; T Clark Gamblin; Sameer H Patel; Vikrom Dhar; Ryan J Hendrix; Laura Lambert; Daniel E Abbott; Courtney Pokrzywa; Kelly Lafaro; Byrne Lee; Mohammad Y Zaidi; Shishir K Maithel; Fabian M Johnston; Jonathan B Greer Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Olga M Koper-Lenkiewicz; Anna J Milewska; Joanna Kamińska; Karol Sawicki; Robert Chrzanowski; Justyna Zińczuk; Joanna Reszeć; Marzena Tylicka; Ewa Matuszczak; Joanna Matowicka-Karna; Zenon Mariak; Mariusz W Mucha; Robert Pawlak; Violetta Dymicka-Piekarska Journal: Ann Med Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 4.709