Literature DB >> 22941163

Etiology of breast masses after autologous breast reconstruction.

William J Casey1, Alanna M Rebecca, Anna Silverman, Luis H Macias, Peter A Kreymerman, Barbara A Pockaj, Richard J Gray, Yu-Hui H Chang, Anthony A Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining the nature of a breast mass after autologous reconstruction can be difficult.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all autologous breast reconstructions was performed over 10 years. All postoperative breast masses were identified. Tumor characteristics, adjuvant treatment, timing of the development of the mass, and correlation with radiology were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 365 flaps were performed on 272 patients [253 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), 35 superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA), 22 muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (free MS-TRAM), 25 latissimus, and 30 pedicled TRAM]. Breast masses were identified in 66 breasts (18 %). The majority of these were from fat necrosis, occurring in 54 breasts (15 % overall; DIEP 13.4 %, SIEA 5.7 %, free MS-TRAM 15 %, latissimus 0 %, pedicled TRAM 47 %), first identified at a mean of 3 months. Recurrent carcinoma was diagnosed in 13 breasts (3.6 %). Factors associated with the postreconstruction mass representing recurrent carcinoma were later time period after reconstruction (mean 24 months), closer surgical margins, and lymphovascular invasion. Radiographic imaging accurately diagnosed recurrent carcinoma in 11 (92 %) of 12 patients in whom it was utilized and suggested a benign diagnosis in all 16 patients with fat necrosis in whom it was utilized.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast masses frequently present after autologous reconstruction. Fat necrosis is the most common cause. Recurrent carcinoma can occur in the reconstructed breast and presents later. A higher index of suspicion for recurrence should accompany any mass in which prior lymphovascular invasion was present or if original margins were <1 cm. Radiographic imaging accurately identifies the cause of these masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941163     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2605-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality Imaging of the Reconstructed Breast.

Authors:  Beatriz E Adrada; Gary J Whitman; Melissa A Crosby; Selin Carkaci; Mark J Dryden; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2015-04-27

2.  Breast cancer recurrences in myocutaneous flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Hannah L Chung; Jessica W T Leung
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2020-10-29

3.  Imaging Surveillance of the Reconstructed Breast in a Subset of Patients May Aid in Early Detection of Breast Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Beatriz Elena Adrada; Niloofar Karbasian; Monica Huang; Gaiane Maia Rauch; Piyanoot Woodtichartpreecha; Gary Whitman
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2021-11-09

4.  Ultrasound Shear-Wave Elastography for Follow-Up Fat Induration after Breast Reconstruction with an Autologous Flap.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sowa; Toshiaki Numajiri; Kenichi Nishino
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-09-22

5.  Tumoral Calcinosis: An Uncommon Cause for a Mass in a Reconstructed Breast.

Authors:  Eugene Koh; Nicola R Dean; David I Watson; Christopher D Carter
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-05-05

6.  DIEAP Flap Breast Reconstruction Followed by Local Recurrence of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Julia V M Huiskes; Mariël E Keemers-Gels; Jan Fabré; Luc J A Strobbe
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2018-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.