Literature DB >> 22940563

Modeling the longitudinal transitions of performance status in cancer outpatients: time to discuss palliative care.

Rinku Sutradhar1, Hsien Seow, Craig Earle, Deborah Dudgeon, Clare Atzema, Amna Husain, Doris Howell, Ying Liu, Jonathan Sussman, Lisa Barbera.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Understanding the longitudinal transitions of performance status among persons with cancer can assist providers in determining the appropriate time to initiate palliative care support.
OBJECTIVES: To model longitudinal transitions of performance status in cancer outpatients, to determine the probabilities of improvement and deterioration in performance status over time, and to evaluate the factors associated with rates of transitions.
METHODS: This population-based, retrospective, cohort study comprised adult outpatients diagnosed with any type of cancer and assessed for performance status throughout their observation period using the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS; scale 0-100; 0 indicates death). At every PPS assessment, patients were assigned to one of four states: stable state (PPS score 70-100), transitional state (PPS score 40-60), end-of-life state (PPS score 10-30), or dead. A Markov multistate model under the presence of interval censoring was used to examine the rate of state-to-state transitions.
RESULTS: There were 11,374 patients representing nearly 71,000 assessments. Patients with lung cancer in the transitional state had a 27.7% chance of being dead at the end of one month vs. 17.5% in patients with breast cancer. The average time spent in the transitional state was 6.6 weeks for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer vs. 8.8 weeks for patients with breast cancer. The rate at which one moves from the transitional state to death was higher for patients with lung cancer than those with breast cancer.
CONCLUSION: We estimated the probability and direction of change in performance status in cancer outpatients. Entry into the transitional state may serve as an indicator for referral for palliative care support. Mean end-of-life sojourn times are too short to allow meaningful integration of palliative care.
Copyright © 2013 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22940563     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  6 in total

1.  Integration of oncology and palliative care: a systematic review.

Authors:  David Hui; Yu Jung Kim; Ji Chan Park; Yi Zhang; Florian Strasser; Nathan Cherny; Stein Kaasa; Mellar P Davis; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-12-05

Review 2.  Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: Team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care.

Authors:  David Hui; Breffni L Hannon; Camilla Zimmermann; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  External validation of the number of risk factors score in a palliative care outpatient clinic at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Paul Glare; Imran Shariff; Howard T Thaler
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Palliative performance scale and survival among outpatients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Jeff Myers; Audrey Kim; Jamie Flanagan; Debbie Selby
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Karnofsky Performance Scale validity and reliability of Turkish palliative cancer patients

Authors:  Nagihan Yıldız Çeltek; Mustafa Süren; Osman Demir; İsmail Okan
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 0.973

Review 6.  Referral Criteria for Outpatient Palliative Cancer Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Hui; Yee-Choon Meng; Sebastian Bruera; Yimin Geng; Ron Hutchins; Masanori Mori; Florian Strasser; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-05-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.