Literature DB >> 22940525

NEPA, EPA and risk assessment: Has EPA lost its way?

Edward J Calabrese1.   

Abstract

The EPA risk assessment practice denies the inclusion of beneficial responses in the evaluation process. This practice represents a marked deviation from the original guidelines set forth within NEPA, which required the integrated goal of environmental protection as including both a reduction in risk as well as an enhancement of health benefit. It is time for regulatory agencies such as EPA to incorporate both harm and benefit within its risk assessment process.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22940525     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  2 in total

1.  Threshold for Radon-Induced Lung Cancer From Inhaled Plutonium Data.

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler; Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection.

Authors:  John J Cardarelli; Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.658

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.