Literature DB >> 22940373

Measuring the degree of closeness to the cancer experience: development and initial validation of the CONNection to the Experience of Cancer Scale (CONNECS).

Nikki A Hawkins1, Frances McCarty, Lucy A Peipins, Juan L Rodriguez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and psychometric testing of items measuring connection to the cancer experience through a close friend or relative.
METHODS: Ten items assess four aspects of connection to cancer: emotional and cognitive involvement, kind and amount of shared experience, perceived similarity to the affected person, and negative change witnessed. Interviews were conducted with 2200 women close to someone with cancer. The sample was split into two samples for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Sample 1 (n=1342) was used to examine the underlying structure of the items. Sample 2 (n=858) was used for CFA. Internal consistency and reliability analysis were also conducted.
RESULTS: Three factors with moderate correlation were extracted: general closeness, resemblance, and cognitive processing. Results from the CFA analysis confirmed a good fit of the three-factor model (Bentler-Bonett NIF=0.973, Bentler-Bonett NNFI=0.975, RMSEA=0.040 and CFI=0.984) and all path coefficients were statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Findings provide preliminary evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the CONNECS scale in measuring individuals' connection to the cancer experience through a close friend or relative. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: CONNECS may be a useful tool for examining the impact of the cancer experience on risk perceptions, cancer worry, and medical decision making. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22940373      PMCID: PMC6334758          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  6 in total

1.  Receptivity and Preferences in Cancer Risk Reduction Lifestyle Programs: A Survey of Colorectal Cancer Family Members.

Authors:  Lisa A Howell; Tabetha A Brockman; Pamela S Sinicrope; Christi A Patten; Paul A Decker; Shawna L Ehlers; Noralane M Lindor; Sandra K Nigon; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  J Behav Health       Date:  2013

2.  Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Juan L Rodriguez; Nikki A Hawkins; Ashwini Soman; Mary C White; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Lisa A DeRoo; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  An investigation of the colorectal cancer experience and receptivity to family-based cancer prevention programs.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Gladys B Asiedu; Jason Egginton; Pamela Sinicrope; Seung M L Opyrchal; Lisa A Howell; Christi Patten; Lisa Boardman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Understanding the meaning of marital relationship quality among couples in peri-urban Ethiopia.

Authors:  Neetu A John; Assefa Seme; Meselech Assegid Roro; Amy O Tsui
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2016-08-16

5.  Cognitive and affective influences on perceived risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Frances McCarty; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan L Rodriguez; Lawrence E Scholl; Steven Leadbetter
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Receptivity and preferences of pancreatic cancer family members for participating in lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk.

Authors:  Lisa A Howell; Pamela S Sinicrope; Tabetha A Brockman; Christi A Patten; Paul A Decker; Shawna L Ehlers; Ashley Nadeau; Kari G Rabe; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.857

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.