Literature DB >> 22940231

Reward processing and intertemporal decision making in adults and adolescents: the role of impulsivity and decision consistency.

Stephan Ripke1, Thomas Hübner, Eva Mennigen, Kathrin U Müller, Sarah Rodehacke, Dirk Schmidt, Mark J Jacob, Michael N Smolka.   

Abstract

Several studies report differences between adults and adolescents in reward processing and impulsivity. Consistently, adolescents are more impulsive in their decision making, as measured by intertemporal choice tasks. Since impulsivity affects an individual's perception and neural processing of rewards, it is unclear whether previously reported differences in brain activation between adults and adolescents are primarily due to maturation of the brain reward system or differences in impulsivity (i.e. discounting behaviour). To disentangle this, we analysed data from 235 adolescents and 29 adults who performed an intertemporal choice task in which monetary rewards were adapted to individual impulsivity. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we measured brain activity and assessed impulsivity and consistency of choices at the behavioural level. Although adolescents discounted delayed rewards more steeply than adults, when controlling for impulsivity, neural processing of reward value did not differ between groups. However, more impulsive subjects showed a lower brain response to delayed rewards, independent of age. Concerning decision making, adolescents exhibited a lower consistency of choices and less brain activity in the parietal network than adults. We conclude that processing of the value of prospective delayed rewards is more sensitive to discounting behaviour than to chronological age. Lower consistency of intertemporal choices might indicate ongoing maturation of parietal brain areas in adolescents.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22940231     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  23 in total

1.  Laboratory alcohol self-administration experiments do not increase subsequent real-life drinking in young adult social drinkers.

Authors:  Christian Sommer; Christian Seipt; Maik Spreer; Toni Blümke; Alexandra Markovic; Elisabeth Jünger; Martin H Plawecki; Ulrich S Zimmermann
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  An adaptive, individualized fMRI delay discounting procedure to increase flexibility and optimize scanner time.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Harshawardhan U Deshpande; Jonathan M Lisinski; Anders Eklund; Warren K Bickel; Stephen M LaConte
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Personality influences temporal discounting preferences: behavioral and brain evidence.

Authors:  Joshua Manning; Trey Hedden; Nina Wickens; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Drazen Prelec; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The relationship between responsiveness to social and monetary rewards and ADHD symptoms.

Authors:  Bernis Sutcubasi; Baris Metin; Cumhur Tas; Fatma Keskin Krzan; Berna A Sarı; Betul Ozcimen; Nevzat Tarhan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Temporal discounting across three psychiatric disorders: Anorexia nervosa, obsessive compulsive disorder, and social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Joanna E Steinglass; Karolina M Lempert; Tse-Hwei Choo; Marcia B Kimeldorf; Melanie Wall; B Timothy Walsh; Abby J Fyer; Franklin R Schneier; H Blair Simpson
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 6.505

6.  The Observed Longitudinal Relationship between Future Orientation and Substance Use Among a Cohort of Youth with Serious Criminal Offenses.

Authors:  Merrian Brooks; Elizabeth Miller; Kaleab Abebe; Edward Mulvey
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  Intact value-based decision-making during intertemporal choice in women with remitted anorexia nervosa? An fMRI study

Authors:  Joseph A. King; Fabio Bernardoni; Daniel Geisler; Franziska Ritschel; Arne Doose; Sophie Pauligk; Konrad Pásztor; Kerstin Weidner; Veit Roessner; Michael N. Smolka; Stefan Ehrlich
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.186

8.  Neural networks involved in adolescent reward processing: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Merav H Silverman; Kelly Jedd; Monica Luciana
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Adolescents adapt more slowly than adults to varying reward contingencies.

Authors:  Amir Homayoun Javadi; Dirk H K Schmidt; Michael N Smolka
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  CID: a valid incentive delay paradigm for children.

Authors:  Viola Kappel; Anne Koch; Robert C Lorenz; Rüdiger Brühl; Babette Renneberg; Ulrike Lehmkuhl; Harriet Salbach-Andrae; Anne Beck
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.