Literature DB >> 22940160

Inhibitory mechanisms in Down syndrome: is there a specific or general deficit?

Erika Borella1, Barbara Carretti, Silvia Lanfranchi.   

Abstract

The cognitive profile of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) is known to be characterized by an impaired executive functioning, but inhibition-related processes have not been extensively examined in this setting. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether individuals with DS have any specific or general deficit in inhibitory processes. Tasks measuring prepotent response inhibition (the animal Stroop test), proactive interference (proactive interference task and intrusion errors), and response to distracters (directed forgetting task) were administered together with a working memory test to 19 individuals with DS and 19 typically developing (TD) children matched for mental age. Confirming previous findings, our results showed that the DS group performed less well in a verbal working memory task than the TD children. Analyzing our findings for the three inhibitory tasks yielded a picture of the DS children having a generalized difficulty in suppressing information that is irrelevant, or no longer relevant, to the goals of the task. These results suggest that DS is related not to specific, but rather to generalized inhibitory difficulties.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22940160     DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Dev Disabil        ISSN: 0891-4222


  17 in total

1.  Reliability of Informant-Report Measures of Executive Functioning in Children With Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Anna J Esbensen; Emily K Hoffman; Rebecca Shaffer; Elizabeth Chen; Lina Patel; Lisa Jacola
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-05

2.  Dissociations in Cortical Morphometry in Youth with Down Syndrome: Evidence for Reduced Surface Area but Increased Thickness.

Authors:  Nancy Raitano Lee; Elizabeth I Adeyemi; Amy Lin; Liv S Clasen; François M Lalonde; Ellen Condon; David I Driver; Philip Shaw; Nitin Gogtay; Armin Raznahan; Jay N Giedd
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Rule-based category learning in Down syndrome.

Authors:  B Allyson Phillips; Frances A Conners; Edward Merrill; Mark R Klinger
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2014-05

4.  Impact of sleep on executive functioning in school-age children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  A J Esbensen; E K Hoffman
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2018-04-25

5.  Evaluating working memory outcome measures for children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  E K Schworer; A J Esbensen; D J Fidler; D W Beebe; A Carle; S Wiley
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2021-03-25

6.  Language and executive functioning in young adults with Down syndrome.

Authors:  K Kristensen; K M Lorenz; X Zhou; B Piro-Gambetti; S L Hartley; S P Godar; S Diel; E Neubauer; R Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2021-07-21

7.  Treating verbal working memory in a boy with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Margherita Orsolini; Sergio Melogno; Nausica Latini; Roberta Penge; Sara Conforti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-30

8.  Negative emotion evoked by viewing snakes has a motivating effect on cognitive processing in human children with or without intellectual disability.

Authors:  Nobuo Masataka
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 9.  Building an adaptive brain across development: targets for neurorehabilitation must begin in infancy.

Authors:  Jamie O Edgin; Caron A C Clark; Esha Massand; Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Memory profiles in Down syndrome across development: a review of memory abilities through the lifespan.

Authors:  Mary Godfrey; Nancy Raitano Lee
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.