Literature DB >> 22940084

Implicit gambling attitudes in problem gamblers: positive but not negative implicit associations.

Damien Brevers1, Axel Cleeremans, Christine Hermant, Helen Tibboel, Charles Kornreich, Paul Verbanck, Xavier Noël.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Implicit attitudes (associations) are involved in the generation of substance use behaviors. However, little is known about the role of this automatic cognitive processing in deregulated behaviors without substance use, such as abnormal gambling. This study examined whether problem gamblers exhibit both positive and negative implicit attitudes toward gambling-related stimuli.
METHODS: Twenty-five problem gamblers and 25 control participants performed two unipolar (pleasant; unpleasant) Single-Target Implicit Association Tasks (unipolar ST-IAT), in which gambling pictures were associated with either pleasant (or unpleasant for the negative unipolar ST-IAT) or neutral words. Explicit attitudes toward gambling were also recorded.
RESULTS: We found in problem gamblers: (i) both positive implicit and explicit attitudes toward gambling; (ii) no negative implicit gambling association; (iii) that only positive explicit attitudes positively correlated with the gambling severity score. LIMITATIONS: (i) the use of only one type of reaction time task; (ii) the use of both words and pictures in a same IAT; (iii) problem gamblers have been compared to non-gamblers instead of being contrasted with healthy non-problem gamblers.
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas our gamblers experienced deleterious effects related to gambling, implicit attitude toward gambling remained positive, thus hampering attempts to quit gambling. Possible clinical interventions targeting implicit cognition in problem gamblers were discussed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22940084     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0005-7916


  8 in total

1.  Personal gambling expectancies among Asian American and White American college students.

Authors:  Alan Ka Ki Chan; Nolan Zane; Gloria M Wong; Anna V Song
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Let's Open the Decision-Making Umbrella: A Framework for Conceptualizing and Assessing Features of Impaired Decision Making in Addiction.

Authors:  Lucien Rochat; Pierre Maurage; Alexandre Heeren; Joël Billieux
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Gambling and Sport: Implicit Association and Explicit Intention Among Underage Youth.

Authors:  En Li; Erika Langham; Matthew Browne; Matthew Rockloff; Hannah Thorne
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-09

Review 4.  Iowa Gambling Task (IGT): twenty years after - gambling disorder and IGT.

Authors:  Damien Brevers; Antoine Bechara; Axel Cleeremans; Xavier Noël
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-30

5.  An experimental examination of cognitive processes and response inhibition in patients seeking treatment for buying-shopping disorder.

Authors:  Birte Vogel; Patrick Trotzke; Sabine Steins-Loeber; Giulia Schäfer; Jana Stenger; Martina de Zwaan; Matthias Brand; Astrid Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Pathological gambling and the loss of willpower: a neurocognitive perspective.

Authors:  Damien Brevers; Xavier Noël
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2013-09-26

7.  The validation of Implicit Association Test measures for smartphone and Internet addiction in at-risk children and adolescents.

Authors:  Daeyoung Roh; Soo-Young Bhang; Jung-Seok Choi; Yong Sil Kweon; Sang-Kyu Lee; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.756

8.  Social-networks-related stimuli interferes decision making under ambiguity: Interactions with cue-induced craving and problematic social-networks use.

Authors:  Elisa Wegmann; Silke M Müller; Patrick Trotzke; Matthias Brand
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 6.756

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.