Literature DB >> 22939281

Predictive value of negative cone margin status for risk of residual disease among women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.

Chumnan Kietpeerakool1, Surapan Khunamornpong, Jatupol Srisomboon, Ajchara Kasunan, Narisa Sribanditmongkol, Sumalee Siriaungkul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of negative cone margins in predicting residual disease in women with adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS).
METHODS: Data were retrospectively analyzed from 60 women with ACIS who underwent conization at Chiang Mai University Hospital between March, 1998, and December, 2010. Negative margin status was defined as absence of neoplastic epithelium at all margins, coupled with presence of normal cervical epithelium. The association between the incidence of residual lesions and cone margin status was analyzed via χ(2) or Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: When adjusted for age and completeness of visualization of the cervical squamocolumnar junction during colposcopy, women who underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedure were 4 times more likely to have positive cone margins than those who underwent cold-knife conization (95% CI, 1.13-16.43). Residual disease was not found among 26 women who had negative cone margins, but was observed in 17 (65.4%) of 26 women with positive cone margins (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Women with ACIS who had negative cone margins were found to have a notably low risk of residual disease. Adherence to the standard method of cone sampling and criteria for negative margin status might contribute to a high predictive value of negative cone margins.
Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22939281     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

1.  Risk of residual disease and invasive carcinoma in women treated for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.

Authors:  Anthony B Costales; Andrea M Milbourne; Helen E Rhodes; Mark F Munsell; John J Wallbillich; Jubilee Brown; Michael Frumovitz; Lois M Ramondetta; Kathleen M Schmeler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yanming Jiang; Changxian Chen; Li Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study.

Authors:  Paul A Cohen; Alison Brand; Peter Sykes; David C H Wrede; Orla McNally; Lois Eva; Archana Rao; Michael Campion; Martin Stockler; Aime Powell; Jim Codde; Max K Bulsara; Lyndal Anderson; Yee Leung; Louise Farrell; Pennie Stoyles
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Oncological and reproductive outcomes of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix managed with the loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

Authors:  Huimin Bai; Jun Liu; Qiuxi Wang; Ying Feng; Tong Lou; Shuzhen Wang; Yue Wang; Mulan Jin; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.