Literature DB >> 22939196

Selection of carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy based on magnetic resonance plaque imaging reduced periprocedural adverse events.

Shinichi Yoshimura1, Kiyofumi Yamada, Masanori Kawasaki, Takahiko Asano, Masayuki Kanematsu, Masafumi Miyai, Yukiko Enomoto, Yusuke Egashira, Toru Iwama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of treatment selection, either carotid stenting or endarterectomy, based on preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) plaque imaging on periprocedural events.
METHODS: A total of 205 consecutive patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis scheduled for elective revascularization with stenting or endarterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. In period 1, 95 patients were treated regardless of preoperative plaque imaging. In period 2, 110 patients received time of flight MR angiography, and endarterectomy was selected when a high-intensity signal in the plaque was observed on MR angiography because it indicated an unstable plaque. Periprocedural clinical results and outcome at 30 days were analyzed.
RESULTS: In period 1, 5 patients (5.3%) were treated with endarterectomy and the other 90 patients (94.7%) were treated with stenting. In period 2, 35 patients (31.8%) were treated with endarterectomy and the other 75 patients (68.2%) were treated with stenting. Periprocedural adverse events, including any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, were significantly more frequent in period 1 than in period 2 (9.5% v 1.8%; P = .034). Ischemic stroke was significantly reduced from period 1 to period 2 (7.4% v 0.9%; P = .043). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed "treatment selection by plaque imaging" was the only factor identified as an independent predictor of periprocedural events (P = .043).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment selection based on preoperative plaque imaging appears useful for reducing periprocedural events of carotid artery revascularizations.
Copyright © 2013 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery stenting; carotid endarterectomy; carotid plaques; cerebral infarction; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22939196     DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of carotid plaque composition using fast-kV switching dual-energy CT with gemstone detector: comparison with extracorporeal and virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Yuki Shinohara; Makoto Sakamoto; Keita Kuya; Junichi Kishimoto; Naoki Iwata; Yasutoshi Ohta; Shinya Fujii; Takashi Watanabe; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Antiplatelet therapy for carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Yukiko Enomoto; Shinichi Yoshimura
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-09

Review 3.  Cervical Carotid Plaque MRI : Review of Atherosclerosis Imaging Features and their Histologic Underpinnings.

Authors:  John C Benson; Heidi Cheek; Marie C Aubry; Giuseppe Lanzino; John Huston Iii; Alejandro Rabinstein; Waleed Brinjikji
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Associations between Cerebral Embolism and Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage during Protected Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  G H Chung; J Y Jeong; H S Kwak; S B Hwang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Atherosclerotic plaque component segmentation in combined carotid MRI and CTA data incorporating class label uncertainty.

Authors:  Arna van Engelen; Wiro J Niessen; Stefan Klein; Harald C Groen; Hence J M Verhagen; Jolanda J Wentzel; Aad van der Lugt; Marleen de Bruijne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Treatment Strategy Based on Plaque Vulnerability and the Treatment Risk Evaluation for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Yoshiro Ito; Wataro Tsuruta; Yasunobu Nakai; Tomoji Takigawa; Aiki Marushima; Tomohiko Masumoto; Yuji Matsumaru; Eiichi Ishikawa; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 7.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Experience of Staged Angioplasty to Avoid Hyperperfusion Syndrome for Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Kazutaka Uchida; Shinichi Yoshimura; Manabu Shirakawa; Seigo Shindo; Yusuke Egashira; Toru Iwama; Kiyofumi Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience.

Authors:  Yutaro Fuse; Takao Kojima; Kazunori Shintai; Yukio Seki
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.