Literature DB >> 22939028

The decision making process on new vaccines introduction in South Africa.

Ntombenhle Judith Ngcobo1, Neil A Cameron.   

Abstract

South Africa has a functional decision making process for the introduction of new vaccines; with an established National Immunisation Technical Advisory Group (NITAG), referred to as National Advisory Group on Immunisation (NAGI). South Africa has played a leadership role in the African continent with introduction of new vaccines, which dates back to 1995 with the introduction of hepatitis B, followed by the Haemophilus influenzae type b in 1999 and recently the national roll out of the pneumococcal conjugate and rotavirus vaccines in 2009. NAGI has the responsibility to deliberate on key policy issues as part of the process for decision making on the introduction of new vaccines. In developing recommendations NAGI considers: disease burden, cost effectiveness, and the impact on the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). Although guidance and recommendations from WHO are considered, the decision to introduce a new vaccine in South Africa is based on local data. NAGI recommendations are presented to the National Department of Health (NDOH). The NDOH pursues the matter further through the involvement of provinces. When an agreement has been reached to accept the NAGI recommendations, the NDOH seeks funding from the Ministry of Finance (MOF). Once funds are available, the new vaccines are implemented by the immunisation programme. Although there is an established functional system for decision making in South Africa, some areas need to be addressed. A system should be developed to allow the NDOH, NAGI and the MOF to engage in the deliberations on financial and economic impact of new vaccines. It is further recommended that a committee be established that will assess the programmatic issues to weigh the potential benefits of a new vaccine. Furthermore, political commitment should support the immunisation programme and strengthen it so that it can make an impact in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal no. 4 of reducing child mortality.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22939028     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  9 in total

1.  The economic and social benefits of childhood vaccinations in BRICS.

Authors:  Andrew J Mirelman; Sachiko Ozawa; Simrun Grewal
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Quantifying the broader economic consequences of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Germany applying a government perspective framework.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kotsopoulos; Mark P Connolly; Vanessa Remy
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-07-22

3.  What criteria do decision makers in Thailand use to set priorities for vaccine introduction?

Authors:  Siriporn Pooripussarakul; Arthorn Riewpaiboon; David Bishai; Charung Muangchana; Sripen Tantivess
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Rotavirus infection in children in Southeast Asia 2008-2018: disease burden, genotype distribution, seasonality, and vaccination.

Authors:  Fajar Budi Lestari; Sompong Vongpunsawad; Nasamon Wanlapakorn; Yong Poovorawan
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 8.410

5.  Priority setting of vaccine introduction in Bangladesh: a multicriteria decision analysis study.

Authors:  Mohammad Sabbir Haider; Sitaporn Youngkong; Montarat Thavorncharoensap; Praveen Thokala
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A Systematic Framework for Prioritizing Burden of Disease Data Required for Vaccine Development and Implementation: The Case for Group A Streptococcal Diseases.

Authors:  Hannah C Moore; Jeffrey W Cannon; David C Kaslow; Theresa Lamagni; Asha C Bowen; Kate M Miller; Thomas Cherian; Jonathan Carapetis; Chris Van Beneden
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 20.999

7.  Existence and functionality of national immunisation technical advisory groups in Africa from 2010 to 2016.

Authors:  Alison B Wiyeh; Evanson Z Sambala; Ntombenhle Ngcobo; Charles S Wiysonge
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Health technology assessment in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Samantha Hollingworth; Ama Pokuaa Fenny; Su-Yeon Yu; Francis Ruiz; Kalipso Chalkidou
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2021-07-07

9.  Capturing Budget Impact Considerations Within Economic Evaluations: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Rotavirus Vaccine in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and a Proposed Assessment Framework.

Authors:  Natalie Carvalho; Mark Jit; Sarah Cox; Joanne Yoong; Raymond C W Hutubessy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.981

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.