Literature DB >> 22938797

Organisational strategies and midwives' readiness to provide care for out of hospital births: an analysis from the birthplace organisational case studies.

Christine McCourt1, Juliet Rayment, Susanna Rance, Jane Sandall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: the objective of the Birthplace in England Case Studies was to explore the organisational and professional issues that may impact on the quality and safety of labour and birth care in different birth settings: Home, Freestanding Midwifery Unit, Alongside Midwifery Unit or Obstetric Unit. This analysis examines the factors affecting the readiness of community midwives to provide women with choice of out of hospital birth, using the findings from the Birthplace in England Case Studies.
DESIGN: organisational ethnographic case studies, including interviews with professionals, key stakeholders, women and partners, observations of service processes and document review.
SETTING: a maximum variation sample of four maternity services in terms of configuration, region and population characteristics. All were selected from the Birthplace cohort study sample as services scoring 'best' or 'better' performing in the Health Care Commission survey of maternity services (HCC 2008). PARTICIPANTS: professionals and stakeholders (n=86), women (64), partners (6), plus 50 observations and 200 service documents.
FINDINGS: each service experienced challenges in providing an integrated service to support choice of place of birth. Deployment of community midwives was a particular concern. Community midwives and managers expressed lack of confidence in availability to cover home birth care in particular, with the exception of caseload midwifery and a 'hub and spoke' model of care. Community midwives and women's interviews indicated that many lacked home birth experience and confidence. Those in midwifery units expressed higher levels of support and confidence. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: maternity services need to consider and develop models for provision of a more integrated model of staffing across hospital and community boundaries.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22938797     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  6 in total

1.  Birthplace in England research-implications of new evidence.

Authors:  Jane Sandall
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

2.  Birth Care Providers' Experiences and Practices in a Brazilian Alongside Midwifery Unit: An Ethnographic Study.

Authors:  Michelly Christiny M Nunes; Luciana M Reberte Gouveia; Jessica Reis-Queiroz; Luiza A K Hoga
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2016-09-28

3.  The development of midwifery unit standards for Europe.

Authors:  Juliet Rayment; Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho; Mary Newburn; Ellen Thaels; Laura Batinelli; Christine Mcourt
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 4.  Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Urszula Tataj-Puzyna; Dorota Sys; Barbara Baranowska
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-04-18

5.  Safety and wellbeing as spatial capacities: An analysis from two ethnographic studies in primary care and palliative care contexts.

Authors:  Suzanne Grant; Aileen Collier
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 6.  Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities.

Authors:  Ruth Zielinski; Kelly Ackerson; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.