Literature DB >> 22938695

The fitness consequences of the autotomous blue tail in lizards: an empirical test of predator response using clay models.

Charles M Watson1, Corey E Roelke, Paul N Pasichnyk, Christian L Cox.   

Abstract

Numerous vertebrates employ one or more autotomous body parts as an anti-predation mechanism. Many lizards possess an autotomous tail that is brightly colored blue, which has been suggested to either serve as a decoy mechanism to divert predator attention to the autotomous body part, as an interspecific signal, or as an aposematic signal to predators that it is distasteful or dangerous. While theoretical studies suggest that a conspicuous autotomous body part that increases the probability of escape while not increasing the rate of detection will be favorable over a completely cryptic form, there is little empirical evidence supporting the adaptive benefit of an autotomous blue tail. We used in situ clay models of a scincid lizard to test the fitness consequences of blue coloration. Lizard models with a dark base color and blue decoy coloration experienced no measurable difference in avian predation relative to an all-dark model, which suggests that blue coloration neither serves as an aposematic signal nor increases the conspicuousness of the lizard model. Despite statistically similar attack rates, avian attacks on models with blue coloration were indeed focused on body sections that were colored blue. Our results suggest that the blue tail in lizards serves as an effective decoy, and that avian predation has possibly played a role in the evolution of the blue tail.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22938695     DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2012.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

1.  Safe caves and dangerous forests? Predation risk may contribute to salamander colonization of subterranean habitats.

Authors:  Sebastiano Salvidio; Giulia Palumbi; Antonio Romano; Andrea Costa
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-03-01

2.  Moth tails divert bat attack: evolution of acoustic deflection.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; Brian C Leavell; Adam L Keener; Jesse W Breinholt; Brad A Chadwell; Christopher J W McClure; Geena M Hill; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evidence of attack deflection suggests adaptive evolution of wing tails in butterflies.

Authors:  Ariane Chotard; Joséphine Ledamoisel; Thierry Decamps; Anthony Herrel; Alexis S Chaine; Violaine Llaurens; Vincent Debat
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Tail autotomy works as a pre-capture defense by deflecting attacks.

Authors:  Laura A Naidenov; William L Allen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Camouflage versus running performance as strategies against predation in a lizard inhabiting different habitats.

Authors:  Lixia Wan; Zhenxia Liu; Tao Wang; Minglu Yang; Jiasheng Li; Hui Sun; Chenkai Niu; Wei Zhao; Yuanting Jin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Snake and bird predation drive the repeated convergent evolution of correlated life history traits and phenotype in the Izu Island Scincid lizard (Plestiodon latiscutatus).

Authors:  Matthew C Brandley; Takeo Kuriyama; Masami Hasegawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Deceived by stripes: conspicuous patterning on vital anterior body parts can redirect predatory strikes to expendable posterior organs.

Authors:  Gopal Murali; Ullasa Kodandaramaiah
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.963

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.