Literature DB >> 22938445

Predictive potential of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms for prognosis of osteosarcoma patients on chemotherapy.

Shai-Lin Zhang1, Ning-Fang Mao, Jun-Ying Sun, Zhi-Cai Shi, Bing Wang, Yong-Jian Sun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene polymorphisms for the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients receiving chemotherapy.
METHODS: A total of 159 patients were included in our study between January 2005 and December 2007., with follow-up until January 2012. Genotyping was based upon the duplex polymerase-chain-reaction with the PCR-CTPP method.
RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis, 15.4% of the patients presented with metastasis, while 22.3% developed metastasis during follow-up. At the time of final analysis on January 2012, the median follow-up was 45.5 months. Patients with null GSTM1 and GSTT1 had a higher event free survival rate than non-null genotype, but no significant association was found between the two genotypes and prognosis of osteosarcoma. Individuals with GSTP1 Val/Val genotype tended to live shorter than with the IIe/IIe genotype, and we found a significantly higher risk of death from osteosarcoma (adjusted HR=2.35, 95% CI=1.13-4.85).
CONCLUSION: The GSTP1 gene polymorphism may have an important role in the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients with chemotherapy. Further analyses with larger samples and more genes encoding metabolizing and DNA repair enzymes are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22938445     DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.6.2705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  14 in total

1.  Role of five small nucleotide polymorphisms in the VEGF gene on the susceptibility to osteosarcoma and overall survival of patients.

Authors:  Jian-Qiang Liu; Xia Bai; DE-Chen Duan; Ai-Xia Dou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  The pharmacogenomics of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  M Serra; C M Hattinger
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Effect of variation of FGF2 genotypes on the risk of osteosarcoma susceptibly: a case control study.

Authors:  Jiefeng Wang; Hongtao Liu; Xiaoyang Liu; Xiaojun Qi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

4.  Predictive potential of ABCB1, ABCC3, and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms on osteosarcoma survival after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Shizhang Liu; Zhi Yi; Ming Ling; Jiyuan Shi; Yusheng Qiu; Shujuan Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-05

Review 5.  Targeting Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Treatment Efficacy and Resistance in Osteosarcoma: A Review of Current and Future Strategies.

Authors:  Ingrid Lilienthal; Nikolas Herold
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Genetic polymorphisms of interleukin-1 beta and osteosarcoma risk.

Authors:  Yu He; XinJun Liang; ChunQing Meng; ZengWu Shao; Yong Gao; Qiang Wu; JianXiang Liu; Hong Wang; ShuHua Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance in osteosarcoma (Review).

Authors:  Hongtao He; Jiangdong Ni; Jun Huang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Predictive role of Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) on the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jia-Wen Teng; Zeng-Min Yang; Jie Li; Bo Xu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  GSTP1 A>G polymorphism and chemosensitivity of osteosarcoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wu Fengfeng; Ye Ruqing; Xu Juntao
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-04-18

10.  Association between GSTP1 polymorphisms and prognosis of osteosarcoma in patients treated with chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feifei Pu; Fengxia Chen; Songfeng Chen; Baichuan Wang; Jianxiang Liu; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.