Literature DB >> 22938091

Epigenetic alterations in preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the cervix.

Kathleen P Saavedra1, Priscilla M Brebi, Juan Carlos S Roa.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most malignant tumors and the second or third most common type of cancer in women worldwide. The association between human papillomavirus (HPV) and CC is widely known and accepted (99.7% of cases). At present, the pathogenesis mechanisms of CC are not entirely clear. It has been shown that inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and activation of oncogenes play a significant role in carcinogenesis, caused by the genetic and epigenetic alterations. In the past, it was generally thought that genetic mutation was a key event of tumor pathogenesis, especially somatic mutation of tumor suppressor genes. With deeper understanding of tumors in recent years, increasing evidence has shown that epigenetic silencing of those genes, as a result of aberrant hypermethylation of CpG islands in promoters and histone modification, is essential to carcinogenesis and metastasis. The term epigenetics refers to heritable changes in gene expression caused by regulation mechanisms, other than changes in DNA sequence. Specific epigenetic processes include DNA methylation, chromotin remodeling, histone modification, and microRNA regulations. These alterations, in combination or individually, make it possible to establish the methylation profiles, histone modification maps, and expression profiles characteristic of this pathology, which become useful tools for screening, early detection, or prognostic markers in cervical cancer. This paper reviews recent epigenetics research progress in the CC study, and tries to depict the relationships between CC and DNA methylation, histone modification, as well as microRNA regulations.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22938091      PMCID: PMC3502457          DOI: 10.1186/1868-7083-4-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Epigenetics        ISSN: 1868-7075            Impact factor:   6.551


Review

Cervical cancer

Cervical cancer (CC) is the second most prevalent neoplasia in women worldwide and the fifth cause of death by cancer in this population, posing a significant public health problem [1-3]. The incidence of CC and its precursor stages is high mainly in developing countries [4]. In 2008 an incidence of 15.8 and a mortality of 8.2 for every 100,000 women was estimated. Around 529,000 new cases are detected every year, with nearly half of these cases dying [5]. The pathogenesis of CC begins as a slow process that interrupts the normal differentiation of the cervical squamous epithelium, thereby producing changes in its structure and physiology [6]. It initially presents through precursory lesions that evolve slowly and progressively, which can then advance to slight, moderate, and severe stages of dysplasia. CC may evolve into cancer in situ, which is limited to the epithelial surface, and/or into invasive cancer, in which case the involvement goes beyond the basement membrane [7]. Therefore, one of the characteristic factors of CC is its defined clinical stages, which are associated with the different evolutionary stages that lead to the development of the carcinogenesis [8]. It has been firmly established, both biologically and epidemiologically, that the main cause of CC is due to a persistent infection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types, which are present in 99.7% of CC cases [9]. Nevertheless, the presence of a persistent high-risk HPV infection risk is not sufficient to immortalize and transform the epithelial cells of the host; it has been confirmed that the presence of genetic and epigenetic alterations are needed for the development of carcinogenesis. As a result, these factors taken together may alter the control of the cell cycle, causing the host cell to acquire an immortal phenotype and ultimately progress towards a malignant and invasive phenotype [10].

Human papillomavirus

HPV is a small, non-enveloped virus belonging to the Papillomaviridae family of viruses [11]. It contains a circle of double-stranded DNA approximately 8 kb in length [9,12,13]. Generally, the HPV genome is composed of three basic regions: an early region, composed of six open reading frames (ORFs) known as E1, E2, E4, E5, E6, and E7; a delayed region, with two coding ORFs for the structural viral proteins L1 and L2; and an upstream regulatory region (URR) [14]. The HPV life cycle depends on the replication machinery of the host cell and the differentiation of the squamous epithelium of the cervix [9,15]. The cycle begins when infectious viral particles arrive at the basal layer of the epithelium, where they enter the host cell. In the cells of the basal layer of the epithelium, the virus remains stable within an episome with a low number of copies, making up the virus reservoir [15,16]. Once the infected cells of the basal layer are divided, some migrate towards the superficial layer, lose their ability to divide, and initiate their terminal differentiation, whereas the others remain in the basal layer, self-renewing the population and maintaining the infection. In the external layers of the epithelium, the viral DNA is packed in capsids and the lineage is released to initiate the infection again (Figure 1) [9,10,15,16].
Figure 1

Progression of cervical cancer by HPV and promoter methylation during progression. Adapted from Woodman et al., 2007 [5]. The HPV virus has access to the basal cells by means of microlesions present in the cervical tissue. The virus is maintained in episomic form with a low number of copies (cells with a purple nucleus). The cells of the basal layer are divided and begin to migrate towards the surface. The untreated lesions progress to microinvasive and invasive cancer, where the HPV genome is associated with the host genome (cells with red nuclei). In the superficial layer the viral DNA is packed in capsids and the progeny is released to reinitiate the infection.

Progression of cervical cancer by HPV and promoter methylation during progression. Adapted from Woodman et al., 2007 [5]. The HPV virus has access to the basal cells by means of microlesions present in the cervical tissue. The virus is maintained in episomic form with a low number of copies (cells with a purple nucleus). The cells of the basal layer are divided and begin to migrate towards the surface. The untreated lesions progress to microinvasive and invasive cancer, where the HPV genome is associated with the host genome (cells with red nuclei). In the superficial layer the viral DNA is packed in capsids and the progeny is released to reinitiate the infection. During the progression of the carcinogenesis, the HPV genome is integrated into the genome of the host cell, so that the virus not only has a complete life cycle but also manages to persist in the host cell. During this integration the coding regions for E1 and E2 are usually interrupted, resulting in the loss of expression from the viral E2 gene, which acts as a repressor of the gene expression of E6 and E7, thus allowing an increase in the expression of both proteins. The form by which E6 and E7 act includes the inactivation of p53 and the hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (pRB), two classic tumor suppressor genes [17]. Currently it is known that E6 and E7 are also linked to various proteins involved in the processes of cell adhesion, including but not limited to apoptosis, cell cycle, DNA repair, metabolism, translation, and transcription signals [6,12,14,17-19].

Epigenetics in CC

Epigenetics is defined as all those heritable changes in gene expression that cannot be explained by an alteration in the DNA nucleotide sequence [10]. The epigenetic modifications most studied are DNA methylation and histone modification. Recently a new [10] epigenetic phenomenon has been suggested, microRNA (miRNA), which has been implicated in transcriptional silencing [20,21]. A series of epigenetic alterations have been identified that occur during each of the stages of CC, both in the HPV and in the genome of the host cell [10]. One of the earliest pieces of evidence on record with respect to this subject was thanks to a [3 H]-S-adenosylmethionine incorporation assay performed on cervical neoplastic tissue. In this study, it was observed that the degree of hypomethylation (degree of incorporation of the [3 H]-methyl group) increased progressively together with the advance of the cervical neoplasia [22]. This finding was confirmed by later studies that involved quantitative analyses of DNA methylation supported by computer analysis on interphase nuclei by immune-labeling with anti-5-methylcytosine antibodies. A progressive demethylation of the tissue was observed in samples of dysplasia and cancer compared to normal controls [23,24]. Indeed, most tumor suppressor genes possess promoter regions rich in CpG islands, which tend to be hypermethylated in CC, leading to the inactivity of these genes [20]. Identification of numerous epigenetic alterations in all cervical carcinogenesis stages reiterates the potential value of methylation markers for improved diagnosis. Twelve studies have been identified methylation markers in numerous specimens (serum/plasma, liquid-based cytology, cytobrush samples, and urine) of cervical cancer patients. The best performing panel of genes (methylation status for four genes: CALCA, DAPK, ESR1, and APC) was discovered by Wisman et al., in cervical scrapings. Using this mathylation panel a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 100% was achieved in order to identify cervical cancer patients [25,26].

Methylation in CC

There are numerous reports demonstrating that abnormal promoter hypermethylation leads to silencing or diminished expression of tumor suppressor genes in cervical carcinoma. Epigenetic silencing due to the methylation of genes involved in different regulatory pathways, such as apoptosis, cell cycle control, and DNA repair, among others, has been widely investigated. What follows is a brief review of the genes described as methylated in cervical carcinogenesis according to the pathway involved [4].

Cell cycle

It is well established that cancer cells evolve as a result of a deregulation in the normal cell cycle. The adequate regulation of the cell cycle is essential for all cell types and requires a great number of participant molecules, such as cyclin-dependent kinases, along with other natural inhibitors like p16, Rb, and p15, which play an essential role [27]. For its part, high-risk HPV interferes with the control of the normal cell cycle by means of its viral E6 and E7 oncogenes, which have the ability to bind to the regulatory proteins of the host cell, particularly to tumor suppressor genes like p53 and pRB. This event might cause the degradation of p53 on the part of E6 and the inactivation of pRB by binding it to E7 [28], which in turn permits the overexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16 (p16INK4A), leading to genetic instability [29]. p16INK4A (MTS1, CDKN2) encodes a nuclear phosphoprotein involved in the negative regulation of the cell cycle through the inhibition of CDK4 or −6 by binding to the cyclin D1, which regulates the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This mechanism enables the deregulation of pRB1 at the checkpoint of the G1/S phase, thereby affecting cell proliferation [29,30]. Accordingly, cases have been reported in which the p16INK4A protein was found to be strongly expressed in dysplasias and malignant cells of the squamous and glandular epithelium of the cervix [31-33]. It is argued that due to the action of the high-risk HPV viral oncogene E7 on the Rb protein, a negative feedback is produced that leads to the overexpression of p16INK4A[34,35]. However, the expression of p16INK4A in CC not associated with infection by HPV might be explained by independent pathways of the virus [33]. It has been shown that the inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene p16INK4A might be mediated by different genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, the latter of which include hypermethylation of the CpG islands in gene promoter regions; nevertheless, this event is present only infrequently in cases of CC associated with infection by HPV. In these reported cases, it has been observed that the degree of methylation increases as the carcinogenesis progresses [10,30,33,36], being translated in the expression silencing of p16INK4A. This in turn may provoke the binding of the different CDKs involved in the cyclin D1 pathway, leading to the phosphorylation of Rb, this being a key mechanism for releasing the cell cycle from control by Rb [14]. Cyclin A1 (CCNA1) is a cell cycle regulator essential at the start of metaphase in male meiosis. Thus, a high expression of CCNA1 has been found in testicular cells and hematopoietic progenitors; nevertheless, its expression is low in many other types of cells [37,38]. Kitkumthorn et al. showed that the CCNA1 promoter region is methylated in cases of CC, and the degree of methylation advances as the oncogenesis progresses. Therefore, in normal samples and in low-grade lesions, no methylation was found; whereas in high-grade lesions, microinvasive cancer, and invasive cancer, 36.6%, 60%, and 93.3%, respectively, were found.

DNA repair

Silencing of the DNA repair gene O-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) by methylation of its promoter region is an early event that occurs in various cancers. This gene encodes a DNA repair protein that transfers and accepts alkali groups from the O6 position of the guanine, thereby preventing G > A mutations in the genome [39]. Iliopoulos et al. observed that methylation of this gene increases progressively as the stages of CC advance [40]; similar results were obtained by Lin et al. [33]. In addition to being associated with control of the cell cycle, the CCNA1 gene is also involved in the repair of double-strand DNA breaks affected by radiation [41]. Hypermethylation of the CCNA1 promoter has been associated with a loss of p53 function, which has generally been associated with a degradation resulting from viral oncoprotein E6 [42]. Other genes less frequently related to DNA repair and silenced by methylation of their promoter regions are hMLH1 and FANC[10,43].

Cell differentiation and proliferation

The Wnt family of proteins involves a wide variety of growth factors that regulate cell differentiation, proliferation, migration, and oncogenesis during embryonic development [44]. It has been shown that the aberrant activation of the Wnt signaling pathway takes place during carcinogenesis, inhibiting the apoptosis of tumor cells in different human cancers. When Wnt ligands are present, they bind to Frizzled (Fz) transmembrane receptors, activating the dishevelled cytoplasmatic protein by phosphorylation. The activation of this protein leads to the activation of the Wnt signaling cascade that culminates in the accumulation of β-catenin in the cytoplasm. This is deposited in the nucleus, where it forms complexes with members of the TCF/LEF cells and increases the transcription of TCF/LEF-dependent target genes, such as c-myc, cyclin D1, and TCF-1. In normal conditions, that is, in the absence of the carcinogenic process, the family of secreted frizzled-related proteins (SFRPs) is the one responsible for antagonizing the Wnt signaling pathway, among other antagonists. SFRPs bind directly to the Wnt proteins and block their interaction with the Fz transmembrane receptors. As the Wnt signaling pathway is blocked, the intracellular β-catenin is phosphorylated, ubiquitinated, and finally degraded by proteosomes. Thus, the absence in the nucleus of β-catenin and TCF/LEF interaction might repress oncogene transcription [45-47]. It has been suggested that the epigenetic silencing of antagonists of the Wnt signaling pathway might result in the aberrant activation of this pathway, leading to carcinogenesis.

Apoptosis

The apoptosis pathway is interrupted in most human cancers by various phenomena that affect the pathway’s main components, as for example the suppression of p14ARF, overexpression of MDM2, or mutation of p53 [48,49]. The p53 pathway responds to stress signals, as they are the interruption in DNA replication fidelity and cell division. These signals activate the p53 pathway specifically by means of post-transcriptional modifications, enabling the arrest of the cell cycle, induction of senescence or cell apoptosis [48,49]. One of the protein layers to induce apoptosis is p73, a member of the p53 family of tumor suppressor proteins, a protein with both a strong structural as well as functional homology. This leads to this protein, when overexpressed, possibly activating the transcription of p53-responsive genes, such as p21, Bax, MDM2, and GADD45, and to cell growth inhibition by apoptosis induction [49,50]. P73 transcription is regulated by promoter regions and the first exon of gene p73, regions rich in CpG dinucleotides. Methylation in the cytokine residues of CpG dinucleotides present in these regions plays a key role in the regulation of p73 gene expression due to epigenetic modifications. The transcriptional silencing of p73 has been demonstrated in leukemia, lymphomas, brain tumors, and ovary cell lines [51,52]. Recent studies have reported the existence of epigenetic modifications that might act on p73 through the hypermethylation of their CpG islets, making it an important inactivation mechanism of the gene expression of p73 in CC. In this study it was observed that 38.8% of samples with CC presented hypermethylation of the p73 gene vs. 3.2% in control samples. The hypermethylation of p73 was significantly related to the reduction or suppression of p73 expression. It is important to emphasize that the expression of p73 is associated with favorable responses to radiation therapy in CC, whereas suppression of the protein is related to radioresistance [53].

Histone modification

Cancer cells show histone modification patterns in individual genes and generally at the nuclear level in individual cells. Histone acetyl transferases (HAT) and deacetylases (HDAC) are two enzymes with opposite activities, responsible for regulating the transcriptional machinery, controlling the state of histone acetylation. It has been shown that these enzymes might be involved in cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and regulation of the cell cycle [54-56]. As a result, deregulation of the state of histone acetylation at cell level might be related to the carcinogenic process. In CC it has been shown that HDAC1 and 2 are overexpressed in cases of dysplasia and CC. The relation that presents the suppression of HDAC2 with the increase of apoptosis, associated with an increase in the p53-independent expression of p21Cip1/WAF1 was also determined [54]. The MGMT gene, the participation of which in DNA repair was detailed previously, is silenced in cases of CC by histone deacetylase action [57]. It has also been reported that the acetylated and phosphorylated forms of histone H3 in cytological smears display a noticeable association of histone H3 modification with the progression of carcinogenesis from low-grade to high-grade lesions [58]. It has recently been demonstrated that the therapeutic use of histone deacetylase inhibitors in CC has a high anti-cancer potential [59].

miRNA

Several studies have proven the existence of miRNA expression profiles in cervical cancer. Lee et al. described the overexpression of 10 miRNA in CC: miR-199-s, miR-9, miR-199a*, miR-199a, miR-199b, miR-145, miR-133a, miR-133b, miR-214, and miR-127, and only two repressed, miR-149 and miR-203 [60]. More recently Pereira et al. demonstrated that a certain variability exists with respect to the miRNA expression profiles; they described eight miRNA that show a relative reduction in expression during the development of CC, from normal tissue to atypical dysplasia and cancer: miR-26a, miR-143, miR-145, miR-99a, miR-203, miR-513, miR-29a, and miR-199a. Nevertheless, they described another six miRNA that showed a drop in expression from the transition from normal tissue to premalignant dysplasia, but that returned to normal levels with the onset of cancer: miR-106a, miR-205, miR-197, miR-16, miR-27a, and miR-142-5p [61]. miR-21 has been described as an oncogene in six types of cancer; in CC it may promote cell proliferation and might repress the expression of programmed cell death 4 (PCD4) [62]. The expression of miR-218 is reduced in CC, its transcriptional target is laminin-5 β3 (LAMB3), the expression of which increases in cases of CC, and this has been reported as a marker of invasiveness in cervical lesions (Table 1) [63].
Table 1

miRNA expression in cervical cancer

miRNAStateReferences
miR-199-s
Overexpressed
[60]
miR-9
Overexpressed
[60]
miR-199a*
Overexpressed
[60]
miR-199a
?
[66- [61]
miR-199b
Overexpressed
[60]
miR-145
?
[66- [61]
miR-133a
Overexpressed
[60]
miR-133b
Overexpressed
[60]
miR-214
Overexpressed
[60]
miR-127
Overexpressed
[60]
miR-149
Repressed
[60]
miR-203
Repressed
[61]
miR-26a
Repressed
[61]
miR-143
Repressed
[61]
miR-99a
Repressed
[61]
miR-513
Repressed
[61]
miR-29a,
Repressed
[61]
miR-106a
Repression and subsequent normalization
[61]
miR-205
Repression and subsequent normalization
[61]
miR-197
Repression and subsequent normalization
[61]
miR-16
Repression and subsequent normalization
[61]
miR-27a
Repression and subsequent normalization
[61]
miR-142-5p
Repression and subsequent normalization
[61]
miR-21
Overexpressed
[62]
miR-218Repressed[63]
miRNA expression in cervical cancer Thereby, the relationship between cervical carcinogenesis and epigenetics alterations like DNA methylation, histone modifications, and miRNAs have received increasing attention for their potential involvement in the development of CC, especially its usefulness as biomarkers of carcinogenesis. Epigenetic alterations can serve as biomarkers in clinical studies and could be in medical diagnostic. The reversible nature of epigenetic alterations can be considered also for therapeutic approaches of advanced stage cervical cancer.

Conclusions

In spite of being a relatively new area of study, epigenetic alterations have enabled the understanding of the differences present in the gene expression profiles in different diseases, including carcinogenic processes. This way, these alterations have become a powerful line of investigation for the establishment and progression of cancer. As far as CC is concerned, we can highlight the ample number of genes affected by epigenetic alterations at the level of gene methylation, histone modification, and miRNA action. The emergence of this recent information, valuable for the area of clinical diagnosis, has made it possible to establish candidate genes that are useful for the search of early detection biomarkers. Thus the establishment of methylation profiles, histone modification maps, and miRNA expression profiles has become the aim of many investigators, so as to be able to propose new more sensitive and specific alternatives for CC screening. In the same way, these epigenetic alteration profiles could be used for the prognosis of the disease, for the assessment of the patient’s evolution prior to the administration of a certain therapy and for its implementation.

Abbreviations

CC: Cervical cancer; CCNA1: Cyclin A1; DNTMs: DNA methyltransferase; DKK-1: DICKKOPF-1; FHIT: Fragile histidine triad; Fz: Frizzled; HAT: Histone acetyl transferases; HDAC: Histone deacetylases transferases; pRB: Hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma protein; HPV: Human Papilloma Virus; LAMB3: Laminin-5 β3; MGMT: O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; miRNA: MicroRNA; ORFs: Open reading frames; SFRPs: Secreted frizzled-related proteins; URR: Upstream regulatory region.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ contributions

KS designed the article and participated in writing of the manuscript. PB revised the manuscript and contributed to discussion. JCR provided guidance for the overall structure and content of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  61 in total

Review 1.  Chapter 1: HPV in the etiology of human cancer.

Authors:  Nubia Muñoz; Xavier Castellsagué; Amy Berrington de González; Lutz Gissmann
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  The p53 pathway: positive and negative feedback loops.

Authors:  Sandra L Harris; Arnold J Levine
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  Papillomavirus genome structure, expression, and post-transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Zhi-Ming Zheng; Carl C Baker
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2006-09-01

4.  Assessment of gene promoter hypermethylation for detection of cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  G Bea A Wisman; Esther R Nijhuis; Mohammad O Hoque; Nathalie Reesink-Peters; Alice J Koning; Haukeline H Volders; Henk J Buikema; H Marike Boezen; Harry Hollema; Ed Schuuring; David Sidransky; Ate G J van der Zee
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Inhibition of histone deacetylase 2 increases apoptosis and p21Cip1/WAF1 expression, independent of histone deacetylase 1.

Authors:  B H Huang; M Laban; C H-W Leung; L Lee; C K Lee; M Salto-Tellez; G C Raju; S C Hooi
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 15.828

6.  Comparison of DNA hypermethylation patterns in different types of uterine cancer: cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical adenocarcinoma and endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sokbom Kang; Jae Weon Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang; Sun Lee; Noh Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song; Sang Yoon Park; Soon Beom Kang; Hyo Pyo Lee
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  The hypermethylation and protein expression of p16 INK4A and DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in various uterine cervical lesions.

Authors:  Zhenhua Lin; Meihua Gao; Xianglan Zhang; Young-Sik Kim; Eung-Seok Lee; Han-Kyeom Kim; Insun Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  Epigenetics of cervical cancer. An overview and therapeutic perspectives.

Authors:  Alfonso Dueñas-González; Marcela Lizano; Myrna Candelaria; Lucely Cetina; Claudia Arce; Eduardo Cervera
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 9.  The papillomavirus life cycle.

Authors:  John Doorbar
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.168

10.  Cyclin A1 promoter hypermethylation in human papillomavirus-associated cervical cancer.

Authors:  Nakarin Kitkumthorn; Pattamawadee Yanatatsanajit; Sorapop Kiatpongsan; Chureerat Phokaew; Surang Triratanachat; Prasert Trivijitsilp; Wichai Termrungruanglert; Damrong Tresukosol; Somchai Niruthisard; Apiwat Mutirangura
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetics and cervical cancer: from pathogenesis to therapy.

Authors:  Jinchuan Fang; Hai Zhang; Sufang Jin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-02-20

Review 2.  Clinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Renske D M Steenbergen; Peter J F Snijders; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Transcript levels of ten-eleven translocation type 1-3 in cervical cancer and non-cancerous cervical tissues.

Authors:  Dorota Ewa Bronowicka-Kłys; Andrzej Roszak; Piotr Pawlik; Stefan Sajdak; Anna Sowińska; Paweł Piotr Jagodziński
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Overexpression of Notch1 is associated with the progression of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Rui Zhang; Shujuan Zhou; Yuqiang Ji
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Dysregulation of microRNA expression in human cervical preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions.

Authors:  Ádám Galamb; Márta Benczik; Balázs Zinner; Eszter Vígh; Kornélia Baghy; Csaba Jeney; András Kiss; Gábor Lendvai; Gábor Sobel
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Landscape and Construction of a Novel N6-methyladenosine-related LncRNAs in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Weijie Zhang; Jun Wan; Diming Xiao; Ming Wei
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Epigenetic changes in carcinogenesis of gallbladder.

Authors:  Mallika Tewari; Amit Agarwal; R R Mishra; R N Meena; Hari S Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-04-04

8.  Comparison of HPV genotyping and methylated ZNF582 as triage for women with equivocal liquid-based cytology results.

Authors:  Yu-Ligh Liou; Yu Zhang; Yingzi Liu; Lanqin Cao; Chong-Zhen Qin; Tao-Lan Zhang; Chi-Feng Chang; Huei-Jen Wang; Shu-Yi Lin; Tang-Yuan Chu; Yi Zhang; Hong-Hao Zhou
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.551

9.  Nuclear-encoded mitochondrial MTO1 and MRPL41 are regulated in an opposite epigenetic mode based on estrogen receptor status in breast cancer.

Authors:  Tae Woo Kim; Byungtak Kim; Ju Hee Kim; Seongeun Kang; Sung-Bin Park; Gookjoo Jeong; Han-Sung Kang; Sun Jung Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Human papilloma virus, DNA methylation and microRNA expression in cervical cancer (Review).

Authors:  Hilda Jiménez-Wences; Oscar Peralta-Zaragoza; Gloria Fernández-Tilapa
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.