The preimaginal stages of Pnigalio gyamiensis Myartseva & Kurashev, 1990 (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae), a parasitoid associated with Chrysoesthia sexguttella (Thunberg) (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae).

The larval instars of Pnigalio gyamiensis Myartseva and Kurashev are described in detail for the first time. This species is a larval-pupal ectoparasitoid of Chrysoesthia sexguttella (Thunberg) (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae), which forms leaf mines in the plant Chenopodium album L. (Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae). The female of Pnigalio gyamiensis lays a single egg on the skin of the host larva or nearby it, without any significant preference for a particular variant. The presence of long hairs on its body provides the newly-hatched first larval instar with high mobility. Some peculiarities in this parasitoid-host relationship are described.

Introduction

Five species of the genus Schrank were reared from larva of (Noyes 2012): (Walker) (Triggiani 1978; Hansson 1987; Rizzo and Massa 2002), Ratzeburg, Bouček, Walker (Rizzo and Massa 2002) and Myartseva and Kurashev (Myartseva and Kurashev 1990).

Species belonging to are ectoparasitoids, with solitary or gregarious larval development; most of them are polyphagous, feeding on several species of leaf miners (Askew 1971, 1984). They attack 70 species from 21 genera of Lepidoptera, some of which are pests of agricultural crops (Schauff et al. 1998). The species are potentially important for biological control of lepidopterous leaf miners.

Several species of are poorly morphologically characterized and difficult to identify. Consequently, in 2005 Bernardo et al. (2006, 2007) began to study species in the laboratory from egg to adult. Bernardo et al. (2008) suggested that is a complex of at least two cryptic species, and the same authors (Gebiola et al. 2011) later noted four cryptic species belonging to the complex. All the cryptic species are based on morphological, biological, molecular (Bernardo et al. 2008; Gebiola et al. 2010), karyological (Gebiola et al. 2012a) and endosymbiont data (Giorgini et al. 2010). The complex is currently considered as a complex of several evolutionary lineages with very little morphological differentiation, but with significant genetic, ecological and biological differences (Gebiola et al. 2012b).

Our reared species is morphologically identical to . The DNA sequencing of the paratype was analyzed and revealed to be identical to the DNA sequence of samples from larvae on and . is genetically and biologically well characterized and its taxonomic validity has been confirmed (Gebiola et al. 2012b). Recent literature (Gebiola et al. 2012b) has shown that, based on ITS2 species-specific sequences, the parasitoids reared on the same host-plant system in Italy were genetically identical to the paratype of that was described in 1990 by Myartseva and Kurashev and reared on the – sp. system in Turkmenistan.

The preimaginal stages of have never been described. The aim of this work was thus to describe morphologically the preimaginal stages, especially the larval instars; to describe any differences between the physiological functions of each of them; and to elucidate the biological strategies of solitary parasitoids developing inside leaf mines.

Materials and methods

was reared without any other parasitoids from on L. (Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae). The reared material was studied for the preimaginal stages. Samples of leaf-mines were regularly collected from five different localities in the city of Ul'yanovsk (54°16'N; 48°20'E), (separated from each other by no more than 3 km), between June and mid-September 2009. The food plant of in the Middle Volga region is . This plant is widespread, found in fields, gardens, and along roads and paths. has two generations in this area: the first from May to July and the second from August to September.

In total, 500 leaf mines were collected, from which were reared 224 individuals of and 25 specimens of . There was only one reared parasitoid of . The first generation of was reared fromPageBreak mid-June to early July, and the second generation from the end of July to mid-September. Mines from the leaves were stored individually in the laboratory in small glass tubes covered by several layers of wet gauze. In the present study, parasitoids were reared at 25° ± 2°С.

When mines were opened and photographed, this often prevented further development of parasitoid larvae. The total number of observations was 170. The number of observation of each larval instar is given below. In order to assess significant differences we used a non-parametric Fisher's exact test.

Video and photos of larval stages were recorded using a Canon Power Shot A-640. Light microscopy was carried out using a MC-2 ZOOM connected to a digital camera and a Mikromed microscope.

Abbreviation: F1–F4 – length of 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th segments of antennal funicle; SMV – submarginal, MV – marginal, PMV – postmarginal and SV – stigmal veins of forewing. Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, Russia (ZISP).

Taxonomic survey

Myartseva & Kurashev, 1990

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pnigalio_gyamiensis

Pnigalio gyamiensis

Morphology.

Our reared specimens were compared with type material (Zoological Institution of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia (ZISP): “Holotype, female, Gami, 3 km W from Ashgabat, ex larva on sp., 13.10.1986 (Saparmamedova) Myartseva, Kurashev, 1990”, two female paratypes with the same label, and one female with label “Gami, 3 km W from Ashgabat, ex larva on sp., 30.10.1986 (Saparmamedova) Myartseva, Kurashev, 1990”.

Morphological diagnosis is based on a study of the type material.

Body length 1.08–1.80 mm; F1 1.1–1.3 times as long as F2; F2 1.1–1.2 times as long as F3; F3 1.0 times as short as F4; F4 1.3 times shorter than clava; callus of propodeum with 2 rows of setae: 1 row with 10–12 setae, 2 with 4 setae; sculpture of mesoscutum areolate and size of seta larger than that in scutellum. Forewing 2.3–3.5 times as long as broad; SMV 1.3–1.6 times shorter than MV; MV 1.8–2.7 times longer than PMV; PMV 2.0–3.3 longer than STV; gaster 1.5–1.8 times as long as broad. Body dark blue, the gaster brown with yellow tick at base, legs completely yellow with dark brown last segment of tarsi, hind coxae yellow with brown bracket (in the base of the coxa).

Seventeen females and eight males of reared by authors are labelled: “Ul'yanovsk, left bank of the river Volga, Verhnaya Terrasa, 56°49'N; 49°44'E, 15 June–8 August 2009 (Yegorenkova)”.

Our species belongs to and its morphological variability is less high.

Female.

Body length 1.35–1.80 mm; F1 1.2–1.3 times as long as F2; F2 1.1 times as long as F3; F3 1.0–1.1 times as short as F4; F4 1.3–1.4 times shorter than clava; forewing 2.5–2.8 times as long as broad; SMV 1.5–1.6 times shorter than MV; MV 1.7–1.8 times longer than PMV; PMV 2.7–2.8 longer than STV; gaster 1.4–1.5 times as long as broad. Body dark green with metallic tint, gaster with yellow tick or spot in the base of the gaster, legs completely yellow with dark brown last segment of tarsi, hind coxae mostly yellow without brown bracket. Male (first description): body length 1.25–1.38 mm; thorax 1.6 times as long as broad; pronotum 1.7 times as broad as long; sculpture of scutellum is the same as that of the mesoscutum; propodeum 2.3 times as broad as long; gaster 1.7–1.8 times as long as broad. Colouring is the same as in the female, sometimes hind femur and fourth tarsal segments darkened.

Distribution.

Turkmenistan (Myartseva, Kurashev, 1990), Italy (Gebiola et al. 2012b). New record for Middle Volga Basin (Russia).

Biology.

Larval solitary ectoparasitoid.

Description of preimaginal stages of

Egg

The shape of the egg changes during development of the embryo. The egg (Figure 1) just laid by a female of the parasitoid is oblong, both ends are rounded, with one a little broader than the other. The egg is white and shiny without sculpture. As the embryo develops, the egg becomes oval. Such eggs were either found beside the host (larva of dead ) (Figure 2) or lying on the surface of the host's cuticle. An egg with a fully developed embryo is elongate (Figure 3).

Figure 1–2.

1 A recently laid egg of the female of , on the IV–V segments of the second larval instar of (ventral view) 2 egg with developing embryo in an opened mine of beside the host remains.

Figure 3–4

. 3 egg with developing embryo on IV–V segments of larva (ventral view) 4 1st instar larva in the mine of

Eggs of species of the genus were previously studied by Delenoue and Arambourg (1967) and Gebiola et al. (2009). The embryo can also develop successfully within its egg without a host. In 17 cases the egg was found near the host, and in 20 cases on the skin of the host (n=37). The differences are not significant (Fisher's exact test: p>0.05). Development of the egg lasts on average 2.3 ± 0.8 days before hatching of the first larval instar. It is possible that a newly-hatched first larval instar reaches the host using the long hairs on its body to facilitate movement inside the leaf mine (when the egg is laid near to the host).

1

Morphology. The larva has 13 distinct segments including the extended head, which is 1.3 times as long as the second thoracic segment. The head capsule is dark yellow with one brown mandibular tooth that is used to puncture the cuticle of the host (Figure 4). The shape of the mandible is triangular. Chaetotaxy: the head capsule is covered by hairs. The body has 2 lateral rows of protuberances on segments II, III,PageBreakPageBreak IV, VI, VIII, X, XII and XIII, each with long hairs (total 32 hairs). Length of the hairs is equal to the diameter of the abdominal segments. Long hairs are at an angle of 45° to the body and at an obtuse angle to each other. The first dorsal hairs bend towards the head while the last ones bend back towards the anus.

Behaviour. The larva is very active and quickly moves in the mine by means of muscle contractions, which are clearly visible. The parasitoid larva may feed on the haemolymph but does not do so solely. During observation of this instar it was noted that the larva punctured (drilled into) the cuticle of the host anticlockwise, thereby gaining access to the haemolymph. We observed such larva externally on the host larva and in a mine without a host, where it was probably searching for a host. At the end of this instar the larva becomes less active and moults to the second instar on the surface of the host's body (33 observations).This stage lasts on average 3.8 ± 0.7 days.

2

Morphology. The second instar larva is larger than the first, less active, and the body is segmented (Figure 5). Pulsation of the gut becomes distinct, and the food (firstly pale yellow and later on darkened) is moved to the anal part of gut. This larva moults to the 3rd instar on the surface of the host and the larva's head loses any distinctive shape as well as its hairs.

Figure 5–6.

Larva of (dorsal view) parasitized by 3rd instar larva of 6 3rd instar larva (protuberances are visible, ventral view).

Behaviour. In contrast to larva of the 1st instar that leaves the host several times, this 2nd larva stays on the host, feeding almost entirely on the haemolymph. The 2nd larval instar spends much longer periods feeding than that of the 1st instar larva, resulting in a rapid increase in size. We observed siblicide behavior between the 2nd larval and 4th larval instar of (Figure 7). It means the 2nd larval instar begins to feed on the haemolymph of 4th instar larva (28 observations).This stage lasts on average 2.9 ± 0.6 days.

Figure 7–8.

7 Siblicide behavior exhibited by 2nd and 4th larval instars of on a larva of (dorsal view) 8 4th larval instar of on a larva of inside its mine.

3

Morphology. The 3rd instar larva (Figure 6) has distinct protuberances in some segments (II–IV thoracic, VI, VIII, X and XII abdominal, and XIII anal). Length of a protuberance is equal to its width. Each protuberance has hair 1.5 times as long as length of protuberance.

Behaviour. The larva is actively feeding at this stage and its gut reveals a visible pulsation. We did not observed siblicide behavior between two larvae of 3rd instar. This stage lasts on average 2.5 ± 0.7 days (20 observations).

4

Morphology. The 4th larval instar (Figure 8) lacks mobility and has nine visible pairs of spiracles of the respiratory system on the II and III thoracic and I–VII abdominal segments. The fully fed larva has a dark brown gut that pulsates in one direction for 40 seconds and then in the opposite direction for 40 seconds. It is important to note that PageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakas the larva develops the frequency of pulsation decreases to a rate of 60 seconds in one direction and 60 seconds back. The prepupa loses segmentation and the body instead forms two sections between head and thorax and thorax and abdomen.

Behaviour. At the end of this stage the parasitoid larva leaves the host, stops feeding and loses mobility; its gut is full and equal to 75% of body weight. Antagonistic behavior by larvae against larvae of the same species was not observed; larvae of 4th instar may feed on the same host independently of each other (Figure 9) but might be attack by larvae of the 2nd instar (see Figure 7). This stage lasts on average 2.9 ± 0.6 days (24 observations).

Figure 9–10.

9 Two 4th larval instar on a larva of inside its mine 10 Prepupa of in an opened mine of .

Pupa

Morphology. The pupa attaches to the leaf epidermis (Figure 10).The pupa is initially white or slightly yellow and then begins to darken to dark brown or black. The fully developed pupa of (Figure 11) has a metallic tint but the adult is never visible through the chitinized exuviae of pupa. Female pupa is recognizable by their large gaster and ovipositor visible through the light coloured cuticle of the gaster in the early stage of pupation, whereas the male pupa has a smaller gaster and darker colour.

Figure 11–12.

11 Fully developed pupa of in a mine of (dorsal view) 12 Mandibles of larval instars of : top row mandibles of 1st and 2nd larval instars, bottom row mandibles of 3rd and 4th larval instars.

The pupa is situated inside the mine ventrally to the leaf's surface. It develops on average 5.4 ± 0.8 days (28 observations).

The total duration of development is 19.8 ± 1.2 days.

Behaviour. The adult exits through the oral cavity of the pupa often in the early morning. The adult begins to clean its antennae and head and then leaves the mine.

Conclusion

presents four larval instars and the three moults are easy recognizable. The 1st instar larva is clearly visibly by the presence of long hairs on its body. The mandibles are very small and curved, and used to hook onto the cuticle of the host (Figure 12). Some authors have noted a difficulty in differentiating larval instars, such as in Askew (Tschudi-Rein and Dorn 2001), with the only discernible differences being in the shape and size of the mandibles. They did not report the long hairs on the body that the larva uses for moving across the surface of the host or inside the mine. The 2nd larval instar loses these long hairs and moves slowly; it is recognizable by its mandibles. The mandibles of 2nd, 3rd and 4th instar larvae (Figure 12) differ in size but the 4th instar has one large, well-development tooth.

The emerged adults (both sexes) are shown in Figure 13, 14. The female parasitoid paralyses the larva , which loses mobility, stops feeding and dies. The parasitoid larva then feeds on the killed host. Only a few cases were observed of the parasitoid female having laid an egg on the skin of a dead host larva; but in ePageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakach case the parasitoid larva developed successfully. The female hid her egg on the skin of the host larva or near it without significant preference for any of the variants. The high mobility of the 1st instar allows the larva to find a host quickly and begin to feed.

Figure 13–14.

13 Emerged female of 14 Emerged male of .