BACKGROUND: Current research practice employs wide-ranging accelerometer wear time criteria to identify a valid day of physical activity (PA) measurement. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of varying amounts of daily accelerometer wear time on PA data. METHODS: A total of 1000 days of accelerometer data from 1000 participants (age=38.7 ± 14.3 years; body mass index=28.2 ± 6.7 kg/m(2)) were selected from the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Study data set. A reference data set was created using 200 random days with 14 h/day of wear time. Four additional samples of 200 days were randomly selected with a wear time of 10, 11, 12 and 13 h/day(1). These data sets were used in day-to-day comparison to create four semisimulation data sets (10, 11, 12, 13 h/day) from the reference data set. Differences in step count and time spent in inactivity (<100 cts/min), light (100-1951 cts/min), moderate (1952-5724 cts/min) and vigorous (≥5725 cts/min) intensity PA were assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and absolute percent error (APE). RESULTS: There were significant differences for moderate intensity PA between the reference data set and semisimulation data sets of 10 and 11 h/day. Differences were observed in 10-13 h/day(1) for inactivity and light intensity PA, and 10-12 h/day for steps (all p values <0.05). APE increased with shorter wear time (13 h/day=3.9-14.1%; 12 h/day=9.9-15.2%, 11 h/day=17.1-35.5%; 10 h/day=24.6-40.3%). DISCUSSION: These data suggest that using accelerometer wear time criteria of 12 h/day or less may underestimate step count and time spent in various PA levels.
BACKGROUND: Current research practice employs wide-ranging accelerometer wear time criteria to identify a valid day of physical activity (PA) measurement. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of varying amounts of daily accelerometer wear time on PA data. METHODS: A total of 1000 days of accelerometer data from 1000 participants (age=38.7 ± 14.3 years; body mass index=28.2 ± 6.7 kg/m(2)) were selected from the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Study data set. A reference data set was created using 200 random days with 14 h/day of wear time. Four additional samples of 200 days were randomly selected with a wear time of 10, 11, 12 and 13 h/day(1). These data sets were used in day-to-day comparison to create four semisimulation data sets (10, 11, 12, 13 h/day) from the reference data set. Differences in step count and time spent in inactivity (<100 cts/min), light (100-1951 cts/min), moderate (1952-5724 cts/min) and vigorous (≥5725 cts/min) intensity PA were assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and absolute percent error (APE). RESULTS: There were significant differences for moderate intensity PA between the reference data set and semisimulation data sets of 10 and 11 h/day. Differences were observed in 10-13 h/day(1) for inactivity and light intensity PA, and 10-12 h/day for steps (all p values <0.05). APE increased with shorter wear time (13 h/day=3.9-14.1%; 12 h/day=9.9-15.2%, 11 h/day=17.1-35.5%; 10 h/day=24.6-40.3%). DISCUSSION: These data suggest that using accelerometer wear time criteria of 12 h/day or less may underestimate step count and time spent in various PA levels.
Entities:
Keywords:
Measurement; Physical activity and exercise methodology; Physical activity measurement
Authors: W Jack Rejeski; Anthony P Marsh; Peter H Brubaker; Matthew Buman; Roger A Fielding; Don Hire; Todd Manini; Alvito Rego; Michael E Miller Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Sarah A Purcell; Sarah A Elliott; Peter J Walter; Tom Preston; Hongyi Cai; Richard J E Skipworth; Michael B Sawyer; Carla M Prado Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Tanya K Kaufman; Andrew Rundle; Kathryn M Neckerman; Daniel M Sheehan; Gina S Lovasi; Jana A Hirsch Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Sarah Kozey Keadle; Eric J Shiroma; Masamitsu Kamada; Charles E Matthews; Tamara B Harris; I-Min Lee Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: M-W Sohn; L M Manheim; R W Chang; P Greenland; M C Hochberg; M C Nevitt; P A Semanik; D D Dunlop Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Catrine Tudor-Locke; John M Schuna; H O Han; Elroy J Aguiar; Michael A Green; Michael A Busa; Sandra Larrivee; William D Johnson Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Erin R Hager; Margarita S Treuth; Candice Gormely; LaShawna Epps; Soren Snitker; Maureen M Black Journal: Res Q Exerc Sport Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Ezra I Fishman; Jeremy A Steeves; Vadim Zipunnikov; Annemarie Koster; David Berrigan; Tamara A Harris; Rachel Murphy Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.411