Literature DB >> 22935706

DEC1 and MIC-1: new players of p53-dependent cell fate decision.

Yingjuan Qian, Yong-Sam Jung, Xinbin Chen.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22935706      PMCID: PMC3478296          DOI: 10.4161/cc.21962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


× No keyword cloud information.
The p53 tumor suppressor is an essential barrier against cancer, which is evidenced by loss of p53 activity in the majority of human cancers and unexceptionally early onset of tumors in p53-knockout mice and human Li-Fraumeni syndrome patients. p53 is a sequence-specific transcription factor that regulates gene expression via binding to the consensus p53-responsive element (p53-RE). p53 acts as a central signaling coordinator that receives upstream signals, including DNA damage, aberrant oncogenic activity, hypoxia and ribosomal stress, and consequently activates its targets leading to downstream cellular outcomes, including cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, apoptosis and cellular senescence. However, it is not yet clear how p53 dictates a cell to survival vs. death in response to a specific stress. It has been shown that the ability of p53 to regulate target genes can be modulated by posttranslational modifications. For example, acetylation of p53 on lysine 120 by Tip60 is crucial for p53-mediated apoptosis but not cell cycle arrest. Consistently, p90, a cofactor of Tip60, is required for Tip60-dependent p53 acetylation and, thus, specifically promotes p53-mediated apoptosis. Interestingly, evidence showed that p53 activity is also regulated by binding partners that do not affect p53 modifications. For example, ASPP proteins interact with p53 and enhance the DNA binding and transactivation function of p53 on the promoters of pro-apoptotic genes, such as Bax and PIG-3. Similarly, p53β preferentially enhances p53 transcriptional activity on the Bax but not p21 promoter. In addition, hCAS/CSE1L, a factor identified in the p53 transcription complex, specifically associates with the PIG-3 promoter to induce p53-mediated apoptosis. By contrast, BRCA1 and HZF direct p53-dependent transactivation of pro-arrest target genes over pro-apoptotic target genes. Recently, we found that DEC1, a target of the p53 family and a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor, modulates p53-depedent cell survival vs. cell death in response to genotoxic stress. In addition, DEC1 is capable of inducing cell cycle arrest in a p53-independent manner. As a transcription factor, DEC1 is able to repress gene expression through class B E-box elements, but activate gene expression through Sp1 sites.10 However, DEC1 does not regulate p53 expression. Instead, DEC1 specifically attenuates p53-dependent transactivation of MIC-1, but not other p53 target genes, including two cell cycle regulators (p21 and GADD45α), four pro-apoptotic genes (Puma, Bax, PolH and FDXR) and Mdm2. Consistent with this, knockdown of DEC1 enhances p53-dependent induction of MIC-1 and apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Moreover, upon knockdown of MIC-1, the effect of DEC1 knockdown on p53-dependent cell death is abrogated. These findings suggest that DEC1 forms a feedback loop with p53 to control the response of DNA damage-induced cell survival vs. cell death via MIC-1. To characterize the mechanism by which DEC1 differentially affects the ability of p53 to regulate its target genes, we found that DEC1 associates with the p53 tetramerization domain through its bHLH motif. Importantly, we noticed that the distance between the DEC1-RE and p53-RE on the MIC-1 promoter is only 17 nt, but more than 280 nt on the p21 and Mdm2 promoters. ChIP and ChIP-reChIP assays showed that DEC1 binds to the MIC-1, p21 and Mdm2 promoters but co-localizes with p53 only on the MIC-1 promoter. In addition, DEC1 preferentially suppresses p53 binding to the MIC-1 promoter upon DNA damage. Thus, we hypothesize that both DEC1 and p53 have to bind to the same promoter in close proximity to allow DEC1-p53 interaction, which is prerequisite for DEC1 to decrease p53 DNA-binding affinity and consequently reduce MIC-1 expression (Fig. 1). This unique regulatory loop between DEC1 and p53 provides a clue for investigating other p53 target genes potentially regulated by DEC1.

Figure 1. A model for DEC1 to differentially modulate p53-dependent gene expression. Upon binding to the p53-responsive element (p53-RE), p53 induces an arrary of pro-survival and pro-apoptotic genes, including p21, Mdm2, Bax, MIC-1 and DEC1. Since the p53-RE is adjacent to the DEC1-RE on the MIC-1 promoter, p53 and DEC1 interact tightly on the MIC-1 promoter, which then weakens the ability of p53 to bind to the MIC-1 promoter and consequently p53-induction of MIC-1. By contrast, due to a large space between the DEC1-RE and the p53-RE on the promoters of other p53 target genes, including p21, Mdm2 and Bax, the interaction between DEC1 and p53 on the target gene promoters is too weak to inhibit p53 DNA-binding activity. Therefore, DEC1 does not inhibit the ability of p53 to induce p21, Mdm2 and Bax. Together, we hypothesize that DEC1 forms a feedback loop with p53 to control the response of DNA damage-induced cell survival vs. cell death via MIC-1 and that dysregulation of DEC1 alters the sensitivity of tumors to cancer therapies via the p53-DEC1-MIC-1 loop.

Figure 1. A model for DEC1 to differentially modulate p53-dependent gene expression. Upon binding to the p53-responsive element (p53-RE), p53 induces an arrary of pro-survival and pro-apoptotic genes, including p21, Mdm2, Bax, MIC-1 and DEC1. Since the p53-RE is adjacent to the DEC1-RE on the MIC-1 promoter, p53 and DEC1 interact tightly on the MIC-1 promoter, which then weakens the ability of p53 to bind to the MIC-1 promoter and consequently p53-induction of MIC-1. By contrast, due to a large space between the DEC1-RE and the p53-RE on the promoters of other p53 target genes, including p21, Mdm2 and Bax, the interaction between DEC1 and p53 on the target gene promoters is too weak to inhibit p53 DNA-binding activity. Therefore, DEC1 does not inhibit the ability of p53 to induce p21, Mdm2 and Bax. Together, we hypothesize that DEC1 forms a feedback loop with p53 to control the response of DNA damage-induced cell survival vs. cell death via MIC-1 and that dysregulation of DEC1 alters the sensitivity of tumors to cancer therapies via the p53-DEC1-MIC-1 loop. p53 is frequently mutated in tumors, and most tumor-derived p53 mutations are located in the DNA-binding domain but not the tetramerization domain. Importantly, tumor-derived p53 mutants have gain-of-function activities contributing to tumorigenesis and chemotherapeutical resistance. Since p53 tetramerization domain is found to interact with DEC1, it is likely that DEC1 and mutant p53 physically interact on a promoter that carries DEC1-RE and mutant p53-RE. Thus, it would be of great interest to examine whether DEC1 modulates the function of mutant p53 in tumor progression and the resistance of tumors to therapy. In addition, as a member of the p53 family, p63 and p73 share a high-sequence identity with p53 in the tetramerization domain along with the transactivation and DNA-binding domains. Interestingly, p63 and p73 not only possess p53-like functions in tumor suppression, but also play a key role in development. Thus, it would be interesting to examine whether DEC1 physically interacts with p63 and p73 on a promoter that carries DEC1-RE and p53-RE, and whether DEC1 modulates the function of p63 and p73 in tumor suppression and development.
  10 in total

1.  ASPP proteins specifically stimulate the apoptotic function of p53.

Authors:  Y Samuels-Lev; D J O'Connor; D Bergamaschi; G Trigiante; J K Hsieh; S Zhong; I Campargue; L Naumovski; T Crook; X Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  BRCA1 directs a selective p53-dependent transcriptional response towards growth arrest and DNA repair targets.

Authors:  Timothy K MacLachlan; Rishu Takimoto; Wafik S El-Deiry
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Differential effects on p53-mediated cell cycle arrest vs. apoptosis by p90.

Authors:  Chao Dai; Yi Tang; Sung Yun Jung; Jun Qin; Stuart A Aaronson; Wei Gu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Differentiated embryo-chondrocyte expressed gene 1 regulates p53-dependent cell survival versus cell death through macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1.

Authors:  Yingjuan Qian; Yong-Sam Jung; Xinbin Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DEC1, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor and a novel target gene of the p53 family, mediates p53-dependent premature senescence.

Authors:  Yingjuan Qian; Jin Zhang; Bingfang Yan; Xinbin Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  p53 isoforms can regulate p53 transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Bourdon; Kenneth Fernandes; Fiona Murray-Zmijewski; Geng Liu; Alexandra Diot; Dimitris P Xirodimas; Mark K Saville; David P Lane
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Tip60-dependent acetylation of p53 modulates the decision between cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis.

Authors:  Yi Tang; Jianyuan Luo; Wenzhu Zhang; Wei Gu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  DeltaNp63, a target of DEC1 and histone deacetylase 2, modulates the efficacy of histone deacetylase inhibitors in growth suppression and keratinocyte differentiation.

Authors:  Yingjuan Qian; Yong-Sam Jung; Xinbin Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Hzf Determines cell survival upon genotoxic stress by modulating p53 transactivation.

Authors:  Sanjeev Das; Lakshmi Raj; Bo Zhao; Yuki Kimura; Alan Bernstein; Stuart A Aaronson; Sam W Lee
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  hCAS/CSE1L associates with chromatin and regulates expression of select p53 target genes.

Authors:  Tomoaki Tanaka; Shuichi Ohkubo; Ichiro Tatsuno; Carol Prives
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 41.582

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitors, mitotic stress and the tumor suppressor p53.

Authors:  Mourad Sanhaji; Frank Louwen; Brigitte Zimmer; Nina-Naomi Kreis; Susanne Roth; Juping Yuan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1-alpha 1 inhibits p53 and p73 dependent apoptosis and chemotherapy sensitivity.

Authors:  Alvaro Blanch; Fiona Robinson; Ian R Watson; Lynn S Cheng; Meredith S Irwin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Association of serum level of growth differentiation factor 15 with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiuying Liu; Xiumei Chi; Qiaoling Gong; Lei Gao; Yuqiang Niu; Xiaojing Chi; Min Cheng; Youhui Si; Maorong Wang; Jin Zhong; Junqi Niu; Wei Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  DEC1 regulates breast cancer cell proliferation by stabilizing cyclin E protein and delays the progression of cell cycle S phase.

Authors:  H Bi; S Li; X Qu; M Wang; X Bai; Z Xu; X Ao; Z Jia; X Jiang; Y Yang; H Wu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 8.469

5.  The correlation between the expression of differentiated embryo-chondrocyte expressed gene l and oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jingmin You; Lu Lin; Qiong Liu; Tengfei Zhu; Kun Xia; Tong Su
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  Mice lacking the transcriptional regulator Bhlhe40 have enhanced neuronal excitability and impaired synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Kelly A Hamilton; Yue Wang; Sophia M Raefsky; Sean Berkowitz; Ryan Spangler; Caitlin N Suire; Simonetta Camandola; Robert H Lipsky; Mark P Mattson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  GDF15 knockdown suppresses cervical cancer cell migration in vitro through the TGF-β/Smad2/3/Snail1 pathway.

Authors:  Li Li; Ruihong Zhang; Hailei Yang; Donghua Zhang; Jiwei Liu; Jinfang Li; Bin Guo
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 2.693

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.