E Mora1, M J Portella, I Forcada, E Vieta, M Mur. 1. Psychiatric Service, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lleida, IRBLleida (Biomedicine Research Institute), Lleida, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous cross-sectional studies report that cognitive impairment is associated with poor psychosocial functioning in euthymic bipolar patients. There is a lack of long-term studies to determine the course of cognitive impairment and its impact on functional outcome. Method A total of 54 subjects were assessed at baseline and 6 years later; 28 had DSM-IV TR bipolar I or II disorder (recruited, at baseline, from a Lithium Clinic Program) and 26 were healthy matched controls. They were all assessed with a cognitive battery tapping into the main cognitive domains (executive function, attention, processing speed, verbal memory and visual memory) twice over a 6-year follow-up period. All patients were euthymic (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score lower than 8 and Young mania rating scale score lower than 6) for at least 3 months before both evaluations. At the end of follow-up, psychosocial functioning was also evaluated by means of the Functioning Assessment Short Test. RESULTS: Repeated-measures multivariate analysis of covariance showed that there were main effects of group in the executive domain, in the inhibition domain, in the processing speed domain, and in the verbal memory domain (p<0.04). Among the clinical factors, only longer illness duration was significantly related to slow processing (p=0.01), whereas strong relationships were observed between impoverished cognition along time and poorer psychosocial functioning (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Executive functioning, inhibition, processing speed and verbal memory were impaired in euthymic bipolar out-patients. Although cognitive deficits remained stable on average throughout the follow-up, they had enduring negative effects on psychosocial adaptation of patients.
BACKGROUND: Previous cross-sectional studies report that cognitive impairment is associated with poor psychosocial functioning in euthymic bipolarpatients. There is a lack of long-term studies to determine the course of cognitive impairment and its impact on functional outcome. Method A total of 54 subjects were assessed at baseline and 6 years later; 28 had DSM-IV TR bipolar I or II disorder (recruited, at baseline, from a Lithium Clinic Program) and 26 were healthy matched controls. They were all assessed with a cognitive battery tapping into the main cognitive domains (executive function, attention, processing speed, verbal memory and visual memory) twice over a 6-year follow-up period. All patients were euthymic (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score lower than 8 and Young mania rating scale score lower than 6) for at least 3 months before both evaluations. At the end of follow-up, psychosocial functioning was also evaluated by means of the Functioning Assessment Short Test. RESULTS: Repeated-measures multivariate analysis of covariance showed that there were main effects of group in the executive domain, in the inhibition domain, in the processing speed domain, and in the verbal memory domain (p<0.04). Among the clinical factors, only longer illness duration was significantly related to slow processing (p=0.01), whereas strong relationships were observed between impoverished cognition along time and poorer psychosocial functioning (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Executive functioning, inhibition, processing speed and verbal memory were impaired in euthymic bipolar out-patients. Although cognitive deficits remained stable on average throughout the follow-up, they had enduring negative effects on psychosocial adaptation of patients.
Authors: Morgane Milienne-Petiot; James P Kesby; Mary Graves; Jordy van Enkhuizen; Svetlana Semenova; Arpi Minassian; Athina Markou; Mark A Geyer; Jared W Young Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: P Lei; S Ayton; A T Appukuttan; S Moon; J A Duce; I Volitakis; R Cherny; S J Wood; M Greenough; G Berger; C Pantelis; P McGorry; A Yung; D I Finkelstein; A I Bush Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Elizabeth W Twamley; Kelsey R Thomas; Cynthia Z Burton; Lea Vella; Dilip V Jeste; Robert K Heaton; Susan R McGurk Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Charity J Morgan; Michael J Coleman; Ayse Ulgen; Lenore Boling; Jonathan O Cole; Frederick V Johnson; Jan Lerbinger; J Alexander Bodkin; Philip S Holzman; Deborah L Levy Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Lakshmi N Yatham; Sidney H Kennedy; Sagar V Parikh; Ayal Schaffer; David J Bond; Benicio N Frey; Verinder Sharma; Benjamin I Goldstein; Soham Rej; Serge Beaulieu; Martin Alda; Glenda MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Arun Ravindran; Claire O'Donovan; Diane McIntosh; Raymond W Lam; Gustavo Vazquez; Flavio Kapczinski; Roger S McIntyre; Jan Kozicky; Shigenobu Kanba; Beny Lafer; Trisha Suppes; Joseph R Calabrese; Eduard Vieta; Gin Malhi; Robert M Post; Michael Berk Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Kathryn E Lewandowski; Bruce M Cohen; Matcheri S Keshavan; Sarah H Sperry; Dost Ongür Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Kelly A Ryan; Shervin Assari; Kaley Angers; David F Marshall; Kristin Hinrichs; Rebecca Easter; Pallavi Babu; Bethany D Pester; Scott A Langenecker; Melvin G McInnis Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 6.744