Literature DB >> 22935332

Preliminary trial of postural strategy training using a personal transport assistance robot for patients with central nervous system disorder.

Kenichi Ozaki1, Hitoshi Kagaya, Satoshi Hirano, Izumi Kondo, Shigeo Tanabe, Norihide Itoh, Eiichi Saitoh, Toshio Fuwa, Ryo Murakami.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of postural strategy training using a personal transport assistance robot (PTAR) for patients with central nervous system disorders.
DESIGN: Single-group intervention trial.
SETTING: Rehabilitation center at a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients (N=8; 5 men, 3 women; mean age, 50±13y) with a gait disturbance (mean time after onset, 34±29mo) as a result of central nervous system disorders were selected from a volunteer sample.
INTERVENTIONS: Two methods of balance exercise using a PTAR were devised: exercise against perturbation and exercise moving the center of gravity. The exercises were performed twice a week for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferred and tandem gait speeds, Functional Reach Test, functional base of support, center of pressure (COP), muscle strength of lower extremities, and grip strength were assessed before and after the completion of the exercise program. After the exercise program, enjoyment of exercise was investigated via a visual analog scale questionnaire.
RESULTS: After the program, statistically significant improvements were noted for tandem gait speeds (P=.009), Functional Reach Test (P=.003), functional base of support (P=.014), and lower extremity muscle strength (P<.001-.042). On the other hand, preferred gait speeds (P=.151), COP (P=.446-.714), and grip power (P=.584) did not change. Finally, subjects rated that this exercise was more enjoyable than traditional balance exercises.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic balance and lower extremity muscle strength were significantly improved in response to postural strategy training with the PTAR. These results suggest that postural strategy training with the PTAR may contribute to fall prevention of patients with a balance disorder.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22935332     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.08.208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

1.  Changes in postural strategy during exercise against perturbation using the balance exercise assist robot: a pilot study.

Authors:  Norihide Itoh; Shigeo Tanabe; Satoshi Hirano; Eiichi Saitoh; Jumpei Kawabata; Daisuke Imoto; Yasuo Mikami; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-01-30

2.  Effects of Balance Exercise Assist Robot training for patients with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Seigo Inoue; Yohei Otaka; Masashi Kumagai; Masafumi Sugasawa; Naoki Mori; Kunitsugu Kondo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Benefits of a Balance Exercise Assist Robot in the Cardiac Rehabilitation of Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Kakeru Hashimoto; Akihiro Hirashiki; Kenichi Ozaki; Koki Kawamura; Junpei Sugioka; Shunya Tanioku; Kenji Sato; Ikue Ueda; Naoki Itoh; Kenichiro Nomoto; Manabu Kokubo; Atsuya Shimizu; Izumi Kondo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-06-12

Review 4.  A Systematic Review on Existing Measures for the Subjective Assessment of Rehabilitation and Assistive Robot Devices.

Authors:  Yiannis Koumpouros
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic characteristics during quiet standing on a balance exercise assist robot.

Authors:  Norihide Itoh; Daisuke Imoto; Shuichi Kubo; Masaki Yamaguchi; Naoto Shimizu; Shogo Toyama; Yasuo Mikami; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-10-12

6.  Designing a robotic smart home for everyone, especially the elderly and people with disabilities.

Authors:  Shigeo Tanabe; Eiichi Saitoh; Soichiro Koyama; Kei Kiyono; Tsuyoshi Tatemoto; Nobuhiro Kumazawa; Hitoshi Kagaya; Yohei Otaka; Masahiko Mukaino; Akira Tsuzuki; Hirofumi Ota; Satoshi Hirano; Yoshikiyo Kanada
Journal:  Fujita Med J       Date:  2019-02-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.