| Literature DB >> 22935017 |
Katrien Geurts1, Maulid Mwatawala, Marc De Meyer.
Abstract
The relative abundance of indigenous and invasive frugivorous fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) was evaluated spatially and temporally along an altitudinal transect between 581-1650 m in the Uluguru Mountains near Morogoro, Tanzania. The polyphagous invasive fruit fly Bactrocera invadens Drew, Tsuruta, and White and the indigenous fruit fly Ceratitis rosa Karsch show a similar temporal pattern, but are largely separated spatially, with B. invadens being abundant at lower elevation and C. rosa predominant at higher elevation. The polyphagous indigenous C. cosyra (Walker) coincides with B. invadens but shows an inverse temporal pattern. The cucurbit feeders B. cucurbitae (Coquillett) and Dacus bivittatus (Bigot) show a similar temporal pattern, but the former is restricted to lower elevations. Host availability and climatic differences seem to be the determining factors to explain the differences in occurrence and abundance in time and space.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22935017 PMCID: PMC3467091 DOI: 10.1673/031.012.1201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Geographical position of trapping stations.
Figure 1. Altitudinal distribution of sampling stations. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 2. (a) Temperature and (b) RH at different elevations over time. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 3. Temporal and altitudinal distribution of five dominant fruit fly species: (a) Bactrocera invadens, (b) Ceratitis rosa, (c) C. cosyra, (d) B. cucurbitae, and (e) Dacus bivittatus. High quality figures are available online.
Temporal differences between months for each fruit fly species using Kruskal-Wallis tests.
p-values for Kruskal-Wallis tests for each fruit fly species for differences between sites within months (NA: no individuals caught).
Spatial differences between trapping stations for each fruit fly species using Kruskal-Wallis tests.
p-values for Kruskal-Wallis tests for each fruit fly species for differences between months within sites (NA: no individuals caught).
CCA (only environmental values reported).
Figure 4. Biplot of CCA analysis. October (O), November (N), December (D), January (Ja), February (F), March (M), April (A), May (Ma), June (J), July (Ju), August (Au), September (S), Annona muricata (Am), Psidium guajava (Pg), Prunus persica (Pp), Mangifera indica (Mi), temperature (T), relative humidity (R). High quality figures are available online.
Spearman's rank correlation of overall abundance dominant fruit fly species and temperature.
Spearman's rank correlation of overall abundance dominant fruit fly species and RH.
Host presence (1)/absence (0) for different Locations: Kibundi (K), Mlali (M), Nyandira (N), Visada (V), Langali (L) Months: October (O), November (N), December (D), January (Ja), February (F), March (Ma), April (Ap), May (My), June (Ju), July (Jy), August (Au), September (S)
Fruit fly temporal and spatial abundance (percentage of total fruit fly catch).