Literature DB >> 22934961

A systematic review and meta-analysis of alcohol consumption and injury risk as a function of study design and recall period.

Cornelia Zeisser1, Tim R Stockwell, Tanya Chikritzhs, Cheryl Cherpitel, Yu Ye, Christian Gardner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is well established that alcohol consumption is associated with an increased risk of injury. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses important methodological issues commonly encountered in the alcohol and injury field by delineating the effect of study design and alcohol consumption recall period on effect size magnitude and by conducting gender-specific analyses.
METHODS: We performed meta-analyses using random-effect models. Data sources were peer-reviewed studies on alcohol and injury from 1970 to 2009 from MEDLINE, PsychInfo, and on-line journals. Case-control or case-crossover emergency department (ED) studies reporting injury risk from alcohol consumption 6 hours before injury were included.
RESULTS: The overall odds of injury were 2.799 (2.214 to 3.538, p < 0.001). For case-crossover studies, the odds were 3.815 (2.646 to 5.499, p < 0.001); for ED case-control studies, the odds were 1.977 (1.385 to 2.821, p < 0.001); and for population case-control designs, the odds were 3.145 (1.583 to 6.247, p < 0.005). The "usual frequency" recall period yielded an odds ratio of 4.235 (2.541 to 7.057, p < 0.001), compared to 2.320 (1.789 to 3.008, p < 0.001) for all other methods. There were significant differences in odds ratio magnitude when comparing studies by design and recall period. Females had higher odds of injury than males, 2.285 (1.361 to 3.836, p < 0.005) versus 1.071 (0.715 to 1.605, p = 0.737).
CONCLUSIONS: Study design and alcohol consumption recall period have significant effects on effect size magnitude in estimating the risk of injury from alcohol consumption 6 hours prior to injury. For the "usual frequency" case-crossover design, significant moderator effects were found, resulting in overestimates of injury risk from alcohol. ED case-crossover designs tend to overestimate risk, and ED case-control designs tend to underestimate. We provide recommendations for future ED research.
Copyright © 2012 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22934961      PMCID: PMC3515689          DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01919.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  34 in total

1.  Referent selection in case-crossover analyses of acute health effects of air pollution.

Authors:  D Levy; T Lumley; L Sheppard; J Kaufman; H Checkoway
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.

Authors:  J A Sterne; D Gavaghan; M Egger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Within-subject exposure dependency in case-crossover studies.

Authors:  S K Vines; C P Farrington
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Alcohol related harm.

Authors:  K Ker; R Ivers
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Alcohol and injury: a comparison of emergency room populations in two Canadian provinces.

Authors:  C J Cherpitel; N Giesbrecht; S Macdonald
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.829

6.  Results of two emergency room studies.

Authors:  Jacek Moskalewicz; Grazyna Swiatkiewicz; Cheryl J Cherpitel; Yu Ye
Journal:  Eur Addict Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Should we use a case-crossover design?

Authors:  M Maclure; M A Mittleman
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Recall bias for seven-day recall measurement of alcohol consumption among emergency department patients: implications for case-crossover designs.

Authors:  Gerhard Gmel; Jean-Bernard Daeppen
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Impact of extended drinking hours in Ontario on motor-vehicle collision and non-motor-vehicle collision injuries.

Authors:  Evelyn Vingilis; A Ian McLeod; Gina Stoduto; Jane Seeley; Robert E Mann
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 10.  Alcohol and injuries: a review of international emergency room studies since 1995.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2007-03
View more
  18 in total

1.  Cannabis and traffic collision risk: findings from a case-crossover study of injured drivers presenting to emergency departments.

Authors:  Mark Asbridge; Robert Mann; Michael D Cusimano; Cynthia Trayling; Michael Roerecke; John M Tallon; Alyce Whipp; Jürgen Rehm
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Did the dependent coverage expansion increase risky substance use among young adults?

Authors:  Joshua Breslau; Hao Yu; Bing Han; Rosalie L Pacula; Rachel M Burns; Bradley D Stein
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  The interactive effect of location, alcohol consumption and non-traffic injury.

Authors:  Yu Ye; Cheryl J Cherpitel; Jane Witbrodt; Gabriel Andreuccetti; Robin Room
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Dose-Response Relative Risk of Injury From Acute Alcohol Consumption in 22 Countries: Are Women at Higher Risk Than Men?

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel; Yu Ye; Maristela G Monteiro
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.826

5.  Dose-Response Relationship of Alcohol and Injury Cause: Effects of Country-Level Drinking Pattern and Alcohol Policy.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel; Jane Witbrodt; Rachael A Korcha; Yu Ye; Maristela G Monteiro; Patricia Chou
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Recall bias across 7 days in self-reported alcohol consumption prior to injury among emergency department patients.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel; Yu Ye; Tim Stockwell; Kate Vallance; Clifton Chow
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2017-05-03

7.  Risk of injury from drinking: the difference which study design makes.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel; Yu Ye; Jason Bond; Timothy Stockwell; Kate Vallance; Gina Martin; Jeffrey R Brubacher; Andrew MacPherson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Relative risk of injury from acute alcohol consumption: modeling the dose-response relationship in emergency department data from 18 countries.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel; Yu Ye; Jason Bond; Guilherme Borges; Maristela Monteiro
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Does beverage type and drinking context matter in an alcohol-related injury? Evidence from emergency department patients in Latin America.

Authors:  Gabriel Andreuccetti; Heraclito B Carvalho; Yu Ye; Jason Bond; Maristela Monteiro; Guilherme Borges; Cheryl J Cherpitel
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Differences in risk of injury in the U.S. general population by injury treatment type: data from the 1995 to 2010 national alcohol surveys.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel; Yu Ye
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.