Literature DB >> 22934764

Fragment based drug design: from experimental to computational approaches.

A Kumar1, A Voet, K Y J Zhang.   

Abstract

Fragment based drug design has emerged as an effective alternative to high throughput screening for the identification of lead compounds in drug discovery in the past fifteen years. Fragment based screening and optimization methods have achieved credible success in many drug discovery projects with one approved drug and many more compounds in clinical trials. The fragment based drug design starts with the identification of fragments or low molecular weight compounds that generally bind with weak affinity to the target of interest. The fragments that form high quality interactions are then optimized to lead compounds with high affinity and selectivity. The weak affinity of fragments for their target requires the use of biophysical techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray crystallography or surface plasmon resonance to identify hits. These techniques are very sensitive and some of them provide detailed protein fragment interaction information that is important for fragment to lead optimization. Despite the huge advances in technology in the past years, experimental methods of fragment screening suffer several challenges such as low throughput, high cost of instruments and experiments, high protein and fragment concentration requirements. To address challenges posed by experimental screening approaches, computational methods were developed that play an important role in fragment library design, fragment screening and optimization of initial fragment hits. The computational approaches of fragment screening and optimization are most useful when they are used in combination with experimental approaches. The use of virtual fragment based screening in combination with experimental methods has fostered the application of fragment based drug design to important biological targets including protein-protein interactions and membrane proteins such as GPCRs. This review provides an overview of experimental and computational screening approaches used in fragment based drug discovery with an emphasis on recent successes achieved in discovering potent lead molecules using these approaches.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22934764     DOI: 10.2174/092986712803530467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Chem        ISSN: 0929-8673            Impact factor:   4.530


  34 in total

Review 1.  Focusing on shared subpockets - new developments in fragment-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Eman M M Abdelraheem; Carlos J Camacho; Alexander Dömling
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.098

2.  Fragment-based strategy for structural optimization in combination with 3D-QSAR.

Authors:  Haoliang Yuan; Wenting Tai; Shihe Hu; Haichun Liu; Yanmin Zhang; Sihui Yao; Ting Ran; Shuai Lu; Zhipeng Ke; Xiao Xiong; Jinxing Xu; Yadong Chen; Tao Lu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Evolutions in fragment-based drug design: the deconstruction-reconstruction approach.

Authors:  Haijun Chen; Xiaobin Zhou; Ailan Wang; Yunquan Zheng; Yu Gao; Jia Zhou
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Fragment virtual screening based on Bayesian categorization for discovering novel VEGFR-2 scaffolds.

Authors:  Yanmin Zhang; Yu Jiao; Xiao Xiong; Haichun Liu; Ting Ran; Jinxing Xu; Shuai Lu; Anyang Xu; Jing Pan; Xin Qiao; Zhihao Shi; Tao Lu; Yadong Chen
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.943

5.  Docking-based structural splicing and reassembly strategy to develop novel deazapurine derivatives as potent B-RafV600E inhibitors.

Authors:  Gui-Min Wang; Xiang Wang; Jian-Ming Zhu; Bin-Bin Guo; Zhuo Yang; Zhi-Jian Xu; Bo Li; He-Yao Wang; Ling-Hua Meng; Wei-Liang Zhu; Jian Ding
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Combining in silico and in cerebro approaches for virtual screening and pose prediction in SAMPL4.

Authors:  Arnout R D Voet; Ashutosh Kumar; Francois Berenger; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Targeting Non-Catalytic Cysteine Residues Through Structure-Guided Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Kenneth K Hallenbeck; David M Turner; Adam R Renslo; Michelle R Arkin
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Considerations of Protein Subpockets in Fragment-Based Drug Design.

Authors:  Matthew Bartolowits; V Jo Davisson
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.817

9.  Avidity-controlled delivery of angiogenic peptides from injectable molecular-recognition hydrogels.

Authors:  Widya Mulyasasmita; Lei Cai; Yuki Hori; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Binding screen for cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator correctors finds new chemical matter and yields insights into cystic fibrosis therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Justin D Hall; Hong Wang; Laura J Byrnes; Suman Shanker; Kelong Wang; Ivan V Efremov; P Andrew Chong; Julie D Forman-Kay; Ann E Aulabaugh
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.